Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg

Fujifilm

X-H2S

Stacked APS-C speed flagship with 40fps and 6.2K video.

$2,499

Launch price

Released May 2022

vs

Ricoh

GR

Original APS-C GR with 16MP sensor and 28mm equivalent lens — the pocket street camera that started it all.

$799

Launch price

Released Apr 2013

X-H2S is 9.1 years newer.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Wins

10categories

X-H2S

WildlifeSports & Action

Wins

4categories

GR

VloggingTravel

1 categories tied

Which would you choose?

TL;DR — Key differences

X-H2S wins 4 categories·GR wins 1 categories
  • AX-H2S has higher AF points / zones (425 vs 49)
  • AX-H2S has higher Max video bit rate (720 Mbps vs 150 Mbps)
  • AX-H2S has higher RAW buffer depth (175 frames vs 60 frames)
  • BGR has lower Weight (245 g vs 660 g)
  • AX-H2S has higher Burst (electronic) (40 fps vs 15 fps)

Key specs at a glance

X-H2SGR
Resolution26.16 MP16.2 MP
SensorAPS-CAPS-C
ISO max12,80025,600
Burst40 fps15 fps
4K120 fps60 fps
IBIS7-stop6-stop
Weight660 g245 g
Battery580 shots640 shots

Size and weight, to scale

X-H2S

136 × 93 × 85 mm

660 g (1.46 lb / 23.28 oz)

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

for scale

GR

117 × 61 × 35 mm

245 g (0.54 lb / 8.64 oz)

X-H2S is 19mm wider, 32mm taller, and 50mm thicker than GR.

X-H2S is 415 g heavier than GR.

Depth (front-to-back): 85mm X-H2S · 35mm GR

Sensor size, to scale

X-H2S

23.5 × 15.6 mm · APS-C

367 mm² area

GR

23.7 × 15.7 mm · APS-C

372 mm² area

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

X-H2S

✓ more lenses

Fujifilm X

105+

native lenses available

45 first-party60 third-party

GR: mount data unavailable

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseX-H2SGR
Portrait
6.5Good✓ wins
5.5Fair
Sports & Action
9.5Excellent✓ wins
5.5Fair
Video & Hybrid
6.5Good✓ wins
6.0Good
Landscape
5.0Fair✓ wins
2.0Limited
Travel
7.0Good✓ wins
6.5Good
Wildlife
10.0Excellent✓ wins
6.5Good
Vlogging
5.5Fair
7.5Good✓ wins

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

X-H2S

  • AF low-light limit

    -7 EV vs -4 EV — lower is better

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 136.3, 92.9, 84.6

  • AF points / zones

    425 vs 49 — higher is better

  • Max video bit rate

    720 Mbps vs 150 Mbps — higher is better

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Automobile, Motorcycle/Bike, Airplane…

  • Card types

    Adds CFexpress Type B, SDXC V90

  • RAW buffer depth

    175 frames vs 60 frames — higher is better

  • Burst (electronic)

    40 fps vs 15 fps — higher is better

Reasons to choose

GR

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 117, 61, 34.5

  • Weight

    245 g vs 660 g — lower is better

  • ISO max (native)

    25,600 vs 12,800 — higher is better

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Human, Vehicle

  • ISO min (native)

    100 vs 160 — lower is better

  • Battery life (CIPA)

    640 shots vs 580 shots — higher is better

Both cameras share

  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • Animal / bird AFBoth support animal / bird af
  • Pre-Capture / Pre-ReleaseBoth support pre-capture / pre-release
  • In-body stabilization (IBIS)Both support in-body stabilization (ibis)
  • Card slotsBoth 2
  • TouchscreenBoth support touchscreen

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

X-H2S

Pros

  • 40fps burst
  • Stacked APS-C
  • 6.2K video
  • Great AF

Cons

  • APS-C sensor
  • Complex menus
  • Crop for some modes

GR

Pros

  • Original GR formula
  • APS-C in pocket
  • 28mm GR lens
  • Snap focus culture

Cons

  • 16MP dated
  • No IBIS
  • Fixed lens

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the X-H2S and GR at major authorized retailers.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Full specifications

= category winner

X-H2S
GR
Resolution
26.16 MP+61%
16.2 MP
Sensor type
APS-C X-Trans CMOS 5 HS
APS-C CMOS
Sensor size
23.5 x 15.6 mm
23.7 × 15.7 mm
AA filter
No
No
X-H2S
GR
Processor
X-Processor 5
Image processor
X-H2S
GR
ISO min (native)
160
100−60 less
ISO max (native)
12,800
25,600+1 stop
ISO max (expanded)
51,200
102,400
X-H2S
GR
Shutter type
Focal Plane Shutter
Mechanical + Electronic
Max mechanical speed
1/8000 sec
1/8000 sec
Max electronic speed
1/32000 sec
1/16000 sec

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for sports, X-H2S or GR?

X-H2S scores 9.5/10 versus 5.5/10 for GR — 40fps burst — pro-level action capture.

What's the resolution difference between the X-H2S and GR?

X-H2S is 26.16 MP and GR is 16.2 MP, so the X-H2S captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the X-H2S and GR have in-body image stabilization?

X-H2S has 7-stop in-body image stabilization, while GR has 6-stop in-body image stabilization.

Which shoots faster bursts — the X-H2S or the GR?

X-H2S reaches 40 fps electronic. GR reaches 15 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the X-H2S and GR?

X-H2S weighs 660 g and GR weighs 245 g, so the GR is 415 g lighter.

Do the X-H2S and GR record 4K video?

X-H2S: 4K up to 120p. GR: 4K up to 60p.

Are the X-H2S and GR weather sealed?

X-H2S: Yes. GR: No.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 580 shots (CIPA) for the X-H2S and 640 shots for the GR, giving the GR the edge.

How much does each cost?

X-H2S launched at $2,499 and GR at $799. The GR is $1,700 less.

Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.

Add any camera to get a three-way X-H2S vs GR vs X comparison.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed June 2026.