
Canon
EOS R7
32.5MP APS-C RF-mount body with 30fps burst, 4K 60p, 7-stop IBIS, and advanced subject tracking.
$1,499
Launch priceReleased May 2022
Fujifilm
X-H2S
Stacked APS-C speed flagship with 40fps and 6.2K video.
$2,499
Launch priceReleased May 2022
Released within a month of each other.
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Wins
EOS R7
Wins
X-H2S
4 categories tied
Which would you choose?
TL;DR — Key differences
- BX-H2S has higher RAW buffer depth (175 frames vs 42 frames)
- AEOS R7 has higher ISO max (native) (32,000 vs 12,800)
- BX-H2S has higher EVF resolution (5,760,000 vs 2,360,000)
- BX-H2S has higher Max video bit rate (720 Mbps vs 340 Mbps)
- BX-H2S has higher 4K max frame rate (120 fps vs 59.94 fps)
Key specs at a glance
Size and weight, to scale
📸 Snap this size diff to share
EOS R7
132 × 90 × 92 mm
612 g (1.35 lb / 21.59 oz)

Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
for scale
X-H2S
136 × 93 × 85 mm
660 g (1.46 lb / 23.28 oz)
EOS R7 is 4mm narrower and 3mm shorter than X-H2S but it is also 7mm thicker.
EOS R7 is 48 g lighter than X-H2S.
Depth (front-to-back): 92mm EOS R7 · 85mm X-H2S
Back view, to scale
Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.

EOS R7
132 × 90 mm

Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
X-H2S
136 × 93 mm
Top view, to scale
Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.

EOS R7
132 × 92 mm

Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
X-H2S
136 × 85 mm
Sensor size, to scale
EOS R7
22.3 × 14.8 mm · APS-C
330 mm² area
X-H2S
23.5 × 15.6 mm · APS-C
367 mm² area
1.1× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.
Lens ecosystem
Native lens selection
EOS R7
✓ more lensesCanon RF
105+
native lenses available
X-H2S
✓ more lensesFujifilm X
105+
native lenses available
Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.
Use-case scoring
Which one for what?
Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class
Why pick one over the other
Reasons to choose
EOS R7
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
Adds 132, 90.4, 91.7
Card types
Adds SD, SDHC, SDXC
Codecs
Adds AAC, LPCM
ISO max (native)
32,000 vs 12,800 — higher is better
AA filter
Only EOS R7 supports it
Subject recognition
Adds Human, Vehicle
ISO min (native)
100 vs 160 — lower is better
AF points / zones
651 vs 425 — higher is better
Reasons to choose
X-H2S
AF low-light limit
-7 EV vs -5 EV — lower is better
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
Adds 136.3, 92.9, 84.6
Card types
Adds CFexpress Type B, SD UHS-II, SDXC V90
Codecs
Adds Apple ProRes 422 HQ, Apple ProRes 422, Apple ProRes 422 LT…
RAW buffer depth
175 frames vs 42 frames — higher is better
Subject recognition
Adds Automobile, Motorcycle/Bike, Airplane…
EVF resolution
5,760,000 vs 2,360,000 — higher is better
Max video bit rate
720 Mbps vs 340 Mbps — higher is better
Both cameras share
- ✓AF frame coverage — Both 100 %
- ✓Eye AF — Both support eye af
- ✓Animal / bird AF — Both support animal / bird af
- ✓Burst (mechanical) — Both 15 fps
- ✓Pre-Capture / Pre-Release — Both support pre-capture / pre-release
- ✓In-body stabilization (IBIS) — Both support in-body stabilization (ibis)
Pros & cons at a glance
Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.
EOS R7
Pros
- ✓High-resolution 32.5MP APS-C sensor
- ✓Up to 30fps electronic burst
- ✓7-stop in-body stabilization
- ✓Dual SD UHS-II card slots
- ✓Strong value for wildlife and sports reach
Cons
- –APS-C sensor trails full-frame in low-light depth
- –RF-S lens lineup is still limited
- –4K 60p uses a crop in some modes
X-H2S
Pros
- ✓40fps burst
- ✓Stacked APS-C
- ✓6.2K video
- ✓Great AF
Cons
- –APS-C sensor
- –Complex menus
- –Crop for some modes
Decided which one is right for you?
Compare live prices for the EOS R7 and X-H2S at major authorized retailers.
Canon EOS R7
Fujifilm X-H2S
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Full specifications
✓ = category winner
Frequently asked
Quick answers generated from verified specs.
Which is better for video, EOS R7 or X-H2S?
X-H2S scores 6.5/10 versus 3.5/10 for EOS R7 — 4K 120p slow-motion.
What's the resolution difference between the EOS R7 and X-H2S?
EOS R7 is 32.5 MP and X-H2S is 26.16 MP, so the EOS R7 captures more detail for cropping and large prints.
Do the EOS R7 and X-H2S have in-body image stabilization?
EOS R7 has 8-stop in-body image stabilization, while X-H2S has 7-stop in-body image stabilization.
Which shoots faster bursts — the EOS R7 or the X-H2S?
EOS R7 reaches 30 fps electronic. X-H2S reaches 40 fps electronic.
What's the weight difference between the EOS R7 and X-H2S?
EOS R7 weighs 612 g and X-H2S weighs 660 g, so the EOS R7 is 48 g lighter.
Do the EOS R7 and X-H2S record 4K video?
EOS R7: 4K up to 59.94p. X-H2S: 4K up to 120p.
Are the EOS R7 and X-H2S weather sealed?
EOS R7: Yes. X-H2S: Yes.
Which has better battery life?
Rated battery life is 660 shots (CIPA) for the EOS R7 and 580 shots for the X-H2S, giving the EOS R7 the edge.
How much does each cost?
EOS R7 launched at $1,499 and X-H2S at $2,499. The EOS R7 is $1,000 less.
Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.
Add any camera to get a three-way EOS R7 vs X-H2S vs X comparison.
Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed July 2026.
Product images courtesy of Canon and Fujifilm press materials.