Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg
EOS R6 Mark II

Canon

EOS R6 Mark II

Versatile 24.2MP full-frame hybrid with class-leading AF and 4K 60p video.

$2,499

Launch price

Released Nov 2022

vs
EOS R7

Canon

EOS R7

32.5MP APS-C RF-mount body with 30fps burst, 4K 60p, 7-stop IBIS, and advanced subject tracking.

$1,499

Launch price

Released May 2022

EOS R6 Mark II is 6 months newer.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Wins

8categories

EOS R6 Mark II

Sports & ActionPortrait

Wins

4categories

EOS R7

WildlifeSports & Action

6 categories tied

Which would you choose?

TL;DR — Key differences

EOS R6 Mark II wins 4 categories·EOS R7 wins 1 categories
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher RAW buffer depth (180 frames vs 42 frames)
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher ISO max (native) (102,400 vs 32,000)
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher AF points / zones (1053 vs 651)
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher EVF resolution (3,690,000 vs 2,360,000)
  • BEOS R7 has higher EVF magnification (1.15 × vs 0.76 ×)

Key specs at a glance

EOS R6 Mark IIEOS R7
Resolution24.2 MP32.5 MP
SensorFull Frame22.3 x 14.8
ISO max102,40032,000
Burst40 fps30 fps
4K60 fps59.94 fps
IBIS8-stop8-stop
Weight670 g612 g
Battery760 shots660 shots

Size and weight, to scale

EOS R6 Mark II front view

EOS R6 Mark II

138 × 98 × 88 mm

670 g (1.48 lb / 23.63 oz)

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

for scale

EOS R7 front view

EOS R7

132 × 90 × 92 mm

612 g (1.35 lb / 21.59 oz)

EOS R6 Mark II is 3mm thinner than EOS R7 but it is also 6mm wider and 8mm taller.

EOS R6 Mark II is 58 g heavier than EOS R7.

Depth (front-to-back): 88mm EOS R6 Mark II · 92mm EOS R7

Back view, to scale

Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.

EOS R6 Mark II back view

EOS R6 Mark II

138 × 98 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

EOS R7 back view

EOS R7

132 × 90 mm

Top view, to scale

Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.

EOS R6 Mark II top view

EOS R6 Mark II

138 × 88 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

EOS R7 top view

EOS R7

132 × 92 mm

Sensor size, to scale

EOS R6 Mark II

35.9 × 23.9 mm · Full Frame

858 mm² area

EOS R7

22.3 × 14.8 mm · APS-C

330 mm² area

2.6× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

EOS R6 Mark II

✓ more lenses

Canon RF

105+

native lenses available

45 first-party60 third-party

EOS R7

✓ more lenses

Canon RF

105+

native lenses available

45 first-party60 third-party

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseEOS R6 Mark IIEOS R7
Portrait
8.5Excellent✓ wins
5.5Fair
Sports & Action
9.0Excellent✓ wins
8.5Excellent
Video & Hybrid
7.5Good✓ wins
3.5Limited
Landscape
7.0Good✓ wins
5.5Fair
Travel
7.5Good
8.5Excellent✓ wins
Wildlife
6.5Good
9.0Excellent✓ wins
Vlogging
8.0Excellent✓ wins
6.0Good

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

EOS R6 Mark II

  • AF low-light limit

    -6.5 EV vs -5 EV — lower is better

  • Subject recognition

    Adds People, Dogs, Cats…

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 138.4, 98.4, 88.4

  • Card types

    Adds SD UHS-II, SD UHS-II

  • RAW buffer depth

    180 frames vs 42 frames — higher is better

  • ISO max (native)

    102,400 vs 32,000 — higher is better

  • Internal RAW video

    Only EOS R6 Mark II supports it

  • Codecs

    Adds H.264

Reasons to choose

EOS R7

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Human, Animal, Bird…

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 132, 90.4, 91.7

  • Card types

    Adds SD, SDHC, SDXC

  • Codecs

    Adds AAC, LPCM

  • EVF magnification

    1.15 × vs 0.76 × — higher is better

  • Resolution

    32.5 MP vs 24.2 MP — higher is better

  • Burst (mechanical)

    15 fps vs 12 fps — higher is better

  • Weight

    612 g vs 670 g — lower is better

Both cameras share

  • AA filterBoth support aa filter
  • ISO min (native)Both 100
  • AF frame coverageBoth 100 %
  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • Animal / bird AFBoth support animal / bird af
  • Pre-Capture / Pre-ReleaseBoth support pre-capture / pre-release

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

EOS R6 Mark II

Pros

  • Up to 40fps electronic burst
  • 4K 60p oversampled from 6K
  • Dual Pixel CMOS AF II — superb subject tracking
  • 8-stop IBIS
  • Fully articulating touchscreen

Cons

  • 24.2MP may feel limiting for large prints
  • No CFexpress on base body
  • Short battery life vs. A7 IV

EOS R7

Pros

  • High-resolution 32.5MP APS-C sensor
  • Up to 30fps electronic burst
  • 7-stop in-body stabilization
  • Dual SD UHS-II card slots
  • Strong value for wildlife and sports reach

Cons

  • APS-C sensor trails full-frame in low-light depth
  • RF-S lens lineup is still limited
  • 4K 60p uses a crop in some modes

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the EOS R6 Mark II and EOS R7 at major authorized retailers.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Full specifications

= category winner

EOS R6 Mark II
EOS R7
Resolution
24.2 MP
32.5 MP+34%
Sensor type
Full Frame CMOS
CMOS
Sensor size
35.9 × 23.9 mm
22.3 x 14.8
AA filter
Yes
Yes
EOS R6 Mark II
EOS R7
Processor
DIGIC X
DIGIC X
EOS R6 Mark II
EOS R7
ISO min (native)
100
100
ISO max (native)
102,400+1.7 stops
32,000
ISO max (expanded)
204,800
51,200
EOS R6 Mark II
EOS R7
Shutter type
Mechanical + Electronic
Mechanical Focal Plane Shutter and Electronic Rolling Shutter
Max mechanical speed
1/8000 sec
1/8000
Max electronic speed
1/16000 sec
1/16000

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for video, EOS R6 Mark II or EOS R7?

EOS R6 Mark II scores 7.5/10 versus 3.5/10 for EOS R7 — 4K recording.

What's the resolution difference between the EOS R6 Mark II and EOS R7?

EOS R6 Mark II is 24.2 MP and EOS R7 is 32.5 MP, so the EOS R7 captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the EOS R6 Mark II and EOS R7 have in-body image stabilization?

EOS R6 Mark II has 8-stop in-body image stabilization, while EOS R7 has 8-stop in-body image stabilization.

Which shoots faster bursts — the EOS R6 Mark II or the EOS R7?

EOS R6 Mark II reaches 40 fps electronic. EOS R7 reaches 30 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the EOS R6 Mark II and EOS R7?

EOS R6 Mark II weighs 670 g and EOS R7 weighs 612 g, so the EOS R7 is 58 g lighter.

Do the EOS R6 Mark II and EOS R7 record 4K video?

EOS R6 Mark II: 4K up to 60p. EOS R7: 4K up to 59.94p.

Are the EOS R6 Mark II and EOS R7 weather sealed?

EOS R6 Mark II: Yes. EOS R7: Yes.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 760 shots (CIPA) for the EOS R6 Mark II and 660 shots for the EOS R7, giving the EOS R6 Mark II the edge.

How much does each cost?

EOS R6 Mark II launched at $2,499 and EOS R7 at $1,499. The EOS R7 is $1,000 less.

Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.

Add any camera to get a three-way EOS R6 Mark II vs EOS R7 vs X comparison.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed July 2026.

Product images courtesy of Canon press materials.