Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg
EOS R7

Canon

EOS R7

32.5MP APS-C RF-mount body with 30fps burst, 4K 60p, 7-stop IBIS, and advanced subject tracking.

$1,499

Launch price

Released May 2022

vs
Alpha 6700

Sony

Alpha 6700

26MP APS-C flagship with AI subject tracking, 4K 120p, and 5-stop IBIS.

$1,399

Launch price

Released Jul 2023

Alpha 6700 is 1.2 years newer.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Wins

12categories

EOS R7

WildlifeSports & Action

Wins

5categories

Alpha 6700

TravelSports & Action

2 categories tied

Which would you choose?

TL;DR — Key differences

EOS R7 wins 4 categories·Alpha 6700 wins 1 categories
  • AEOS R7 has higher Burst (electronic) (30 fps vs 11 fps)
  • BAlpha 6700 has higher 4K max frame rate (120 fps vs 59.94 fps)
  • AEOS R7 has higher Card slots (2 vs 1)
  • AEOS R7 has higher EVF refresh rate (120 Hz vs 60 Hz)
  • AEOS R7 has higher IBIS effectiveness (8 stops vs 5 stops)

Key specs at a glance

EOS R7Alpha 6700
Resolution32.5 MP26 MP
Sensor22.3 x 14.8APS-C
ISO max32,00032,000
Burst30 fps11 fps
4K59.94 fps120 fps
IBIS8-stop5-stop
Weight612 g493 g
Battery660 shots550 shots

Size and weight, to scale

EOS R7 front view

EOS R7

132 × 90 × 92 mm

612 g (1.35 lb / 21.59 oz)

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

for scale

Alpha 6700 front view

Alpha 6700

122 × 69 × 75 mm

493 g (1.09 lb / 17.39 oz)

EOS R7 is 10mm wider, 21mm taller, and 17mm thicker than Alpha 6700.

EOS R7 is 119 g heavier than Alpha 6700.

Depth (front-to-back): 92mm EOS R7 · 75mm Alpha 6700

Back view, to scale

Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.

EOS R7 back view

EOS R7

132 × 90 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

Alpha 6700 back view

Alpha 6700

122 × 69 mm

Top view, to scale

Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.

EOS R7 top view

EOS R7

132 × 92 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

Alpha 6700 top view

Alpha 6700

122 × 75 mm

Sensor size, to scale

EOS R7

22.3 × 14.8 mm · APS-C

330 mm² area

Alpha 6700

23.3 × 15.5 mm · APS-C

361 mm² area

1.1× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

EOS R7

Canon RF

105+

native lenses available

45 first-party60 third-party

Alpha 6700

✓ more lenses

Sony E

350+

native lenses available

80 first-party270 third-party

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseEOS R7Alpha 6700
Portrait
5.5Fair
6.5Good✓ wins
Sports & Action
8.5Excellent✓ wins
8.0Excellent
Video & Hybrid
3.5Limited
5.0Fair✓ wins
Landscape
5.5Fair✓ wins
4.0Fair
Travel
8.5Excellent
8.5Excellent
Wildlife
9.0Excellent✓ wins
7.0Good
Vlogging
6.0Good
7.5Good✓ wins

The verdict

For a $100 premium, the most decisive difference is the Canon EOS R7's 30fps electronic burst speed compared to the Sony Alpha 6700's limited 11fps rate.

Choose the Canon EOS R7 if you are a wildlife or sports photographer who requires high-speed performance, as it delivers a 30fps electronic burst rate for capturing extremely fast-moving subjects in the field.

Choose the Sony Alpha 6700 if your primary focus is high-end cinematography, as it supports 4K recording at 120fps to enable high-quality slow-motion footage for professional video production projects and workflows.

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

EOS R7

  • AF low-light limit

    -5 EV vs -3 EV — lower is better

  • Codecs

    Adds H.265, AAC, LPCM

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 132, 90.4, 91.7

  • Burst (electronic)

    30 fps vs 11 fps — higher is better

  • AA filter

    Only EOS R7 supports it

  • Pre-Capture / Pre-Release

    Only EOS R7 supports it

  • Card slots

    2 vs 1 — higher is better

  • EVF refresh rate

    120 Hz vs 60 Hz — higher is better

Reasons to choose

Alpha 6700

  • Codecs

    Adds XAVC HS, XAVC S, XAVC S-I

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 122, 69, 75.1

  • 4K max frame rate

    120 fps vs 59.94 fps — higher is better

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Insect, Car/Train, Airplane

  • RAW buffer depth

    59 frames vs 42 frames — higher is better

  • Weight

    493 g vs 612 g — lower is better

  • 1080p max frame rate

    120 fps vs 100 fps — higher is better

  • AF points / zones

    759 vs 651 — higher is better

Both cameras share

  • ISO min (native)Both 100
  • ISO max (native)Both 32,000
  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • Animal / bird AFBoth support animal / bird af
  • In-body stabilization (IBIS)Both support in-body stabilization (ibis)
  • Weather sealingBoth support weather sealing

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

EOS R7

Pros

  • High-resolution 32.5MP APS-C sensor
  • Up to 30fps electronic burst
  • 7-stop in-body stabilization
  • Dual SD UHS-II card slots
  • Strong value for wildlife and sports reach

Cons

  • APS-C sensor trails full-frame in low-light depth
  • RF-S lens lineup is still limited
  • 4K 60p uses a crop in some modes

Alpha 6700

Pros

  • AI-based subject recognition from A7R V
  • 4K 120p Super35 — outstanding slow-motion
  • 5-stop IBIS in a compact APS-C body
  • 10-bit 4:2:2 internal recording

Cons

  • Single card slot
  • APS-C sensor — narrower DR vs. full-frame
  • LCD resolution 1.03M dots — below competitors
  • No headphone jack

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the EOS R7 and Alpha 6700 at major authorized retailers.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Full specifications

= category winner

EOS R7
Alpha 6700
Resolution
32.5 MP+25%
26 MP
Sensor type
CMOS
CMOS
Sensor size
22.3 x 14.8
23.3 x 15.5 mm
AA filter
Yes
No
EOS R7
Alpha 6700
Processor
DIGIC X
BIONZ XR + AI processing unit
EOS R7
Alpha 6700
ISO min (native)
100
100
ISO max (native)
32,000
32,000
ISO max (expanded)
51,200
102,400
EOS R7
Alpha 6700
Shutter type
Mechanical Focal Plane Shutter and Electronic Rolling Shutter
Mechanical Focal Plane Shutter and Electronic Rolling Shutter
Max mechanical speed
1/8000
1/4000
Max electronic speed
1/16000
1/8000

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for wildlife, EOS R7 or Alpha 6700?

EOS R7 scores 9.0/10 versus 7.0/10 for Alpha 6700 — 30fps burst captures fleeting moments.

What's the resolution difference between the EOS R7 and Alpha 6700?

EOS R7 is 32.5 MP and Alpha 6700 is 26 MP, so the EOS R7 captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the EOS R7 and Alpha 6700 have in-body image stabilization?

EOS R7 has 8-stop in-body image stabilization, while Alpha 6700 has 5-stop in-body image stabilization.

Which shoots faster bursts — the EOS R7 or the Alpha 6700?

EOS R7 reaches 30 fps electronic. Alpha 6700 reaches 11 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the EOS R7 and Alpha 6700?

EOS R7 weighs 612 g and Alpha 6700 weighs 493 g, so the Alpha 6700 is 119 g lighter.

Do the EOS R7 and Alpha 6700 record 4K video?

EOS R7: 4K up to 59.94p. Alpha 6700: 4K up to 120p.

Are the EOS R7 and Alpha 6700 weather sealed?

EOS R7: Yes. Alpha 6700: Yes.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 660 shots (CIPA) for the EOS R7 and 550 shots for the Alpha 6700, giving the EOS R7 the edge.

How much does each cost?

EOS R7 launched at $1,499 and Alpha 6700 at $1,399. The Alpha 6700 is $100 less.

Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.

Add any camera to get a three-way EOS R7 vs Alpha 6700 vs X comparison.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed July 2026.

Product images courtesy of Canon and Sony press materials.