Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg
X-T5

Fujifilm

X-T5

40.2MP APS-C flagship with unrivaled still quality and 20 film simulations.

$1,699

Launch price

Released Nov 2022

vs
Alpha 6700

Sony

Alpha 6700

26MP APS-C flagship with AI subject tracking, 4K 120p, and 5-stop IBIS.

$1,399

Launch price

Released Jul 2023

Alpha 6700 is 8 months newer.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Wins

12categories

X-T5

WildlifeSports & Action

Wins

6categories

Alpha 6700

TravelSports & Action

Which would you choose?

TL;DR — Key differences

X-T5 wins 3 categories·Alpha 6700 wins 2 categories
  • BAlpha 6700 has higher ISO max (native) (32,000 vs 12,800)
  • BAlpha 6700 has higher 4K max frame rate (120 fps vs 60 fps)
  • AX-T5 has higher Card slots (2 vs 1)
  • AX-T5 has higher EVF refresh rate (120 Hz vs 60 Hz)
  • AX-T5 has higher Burst (electronic) (20 fps vs 11 fps)

Key specs at a glance

X-T5Alpha 6700
Resolution40.2 MP26 MP
SensorAPS-CAPS-C
ISO max12,80032,000
Burst20 fps11 fps
4K60 fps120 fps
IBIS7-stop5-stop
Weight557 g493 g
Battery580 shots550 shots

Size and weight, to scale

X-T5 front view

X-T5

130 × 91 × 64 mm

557 g (1.23 lb / 19.65 oz)

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

for scale

Alpha 6700 front view

Alpha 6700

122 × 69 × 75 mm

493 g (1.09 lb / 17.39 oz)

X-T5 is 11mm thinner than Alpha 6700 but it is also 8mm wider and 22mm taller.

X-T5 is 64 g heavier than Alpha 6700.

Depth (front-to-back): 64mm X-T5 · 75mm Alpha 6700

Back view, to scale

Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.

X-T5 back view

X-T5

130 × 91 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

Alpha 6700 back view

Alpha 6700

122 × 69 mm

Top view, to scale

Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.

X-T5 top view

X-T5

130 × 64 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

Alpha 6700 top view

Alpha 6700

122 × 75 mm

Sensor size, to scale

X-T5

23.5 × 15.7 mm · APS-C

369 mm² area

Alpha 6700

23.3 × 15.5 mm · APS-C

361 mm² area

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

X-T5

Fujifilm X

105+

native lenses available

45 first-party60 third-party

Alpha 6700

✓ more lenses

Sony E

350+

native lenses available

80 first-party270 third-party

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseX-T5Alpha 6700
Portrait
7.5Good✓ wins
6.5Good
Sports & Action
8.0Excellent
8.0Excellent
Video & Hybrid
5.5Fair✓ wins
5.0Fair
Landscape
6.5Good✓ wins
4.0Fair
Travel
7.0Good
8.5Excellent✓ wins
Wildlife
10.0Excellent✓ wins
7.0Good
Vlogging
7.0Good
7.5Good✓ wins

The verdict

The $300 price gap between these APS-C cameras centers on the Fujifilm X-T5's 40.2-megapixel resolution versus the Sony Alpha 6700's 26-megapixel sensor.

Choose the Fujifilm X-T5 if you prioritize high-detail photography and professional redundancy, as it offers dual SD UHS-II slots and 7 stops of in-body image stabilization. Its 3,690,000 dot EVF and 6.2K video resolution provide higher technical specifications for stills-focused workflows.

Choose the Sony Alpha 6700 if you require high-speed video and extensive autofocus tracking, leveraging its 4K 120p recording and 759-point AI phase-detect system. The fully articulating screen and lighter 493g body make it more suitable for hybrid creators.

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

X-T5

  • AF low-light limit

    -7 EV vs -3 EV — lower is better

  • Codecs

    Adds H.265, H.264

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 129.5, 91, 63.8

  • Card types

    Adds SD UHS-II, SD UHS-I, SDXC V90

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Automobile, Motorcycle/Bike, Train

  • Pre-Capture / Pre-Release

    Only X-T5 supports it

  • Internal RAW video

    Only X-T5 supports it

  • Card slots

    2 vs 1 — higher is better

Reasons to choose

Alpha 6700

  • Codecs

    Adds XAVC HS, XAVC S, XAVC S-I

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 122, 69, 75.1

  • Card types

    Adds SD, SDHC, SDXC

  • ISO max (native)

    32,000 vs 12,800 — higher is better

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Human, Insect, Car/Train

  • 4K max frame rate

    120 fps vs 60 fps — higher is better

  • Headphone jack (3.5mm)

    Only Alpha 6700 supports it

  • AF points / zones

    759 vs 425 — higher is better

Both cameras share

  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • Animal / bird AFBoth support animal / bird af
  • In-body stabilization (IBIS)Both support in-body stabilization (ibis)
  • Weather sealingBoth support weather sealing
  • TouchscreenBoth support touchscreen
  • Wi-FiBoth support wi-fi

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

X-T5

Pros

  • 40.2MP APS-C — rivals full-frame for detail
  • Compact retro body (557g)
  • 7-stop IBIS in a small body
  • 20 film simulations including Velvia, Provia

Cons

  • 4K 60p has a 1.29× crop
  • 3-way tilt LCD — no full articulation
  • APS-C crop factor (1.5×) for full-frame lenses

Alpha 6700

Pros

  • AI-based subject recognition from A7R V
  • 4K 120p Super35 — outstanding slow-motion
  • 5-stop IBIS in a compact APS-C body
  • 10-bit 4:2:2 internal recording

Cons

  • Single card slot
  • APS-C sensor — narrower DR vs. full-frame
  • LCD resolution 1.03M dots — below competitors
  • No headphone jack

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the X-T5 and Alpha 6700 at major authorized retailers.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Full specifications

= category winner

X-T5
Alpha 6700
Resolution
40.2 MP+55%
26 MP
Sensor type
APS-C X-Trans CMOS 5 HR
CMOS
Sensor size
23.5 x 15.7 mm
23.3 x 15.5 mm
AA filter
No
No
X-T5
Alpha 6700
Processor
X-Processor 5
BIONZ XR + AI processing unit
X-T5
Alpha 6700
ISO min (native)
125
100−25 less
ISO max (native)
12,800
32,000+1.3 stops
ISO max (expanded)
51,200
102,400
X-T5
Alpha 6700
Shutter type
Focal Plane Shutter
Mechanical Focal Plane Shutter and Electronic Rolling Shutter
Max mechanical speed
1/8000 sec
1/4000
Max electronic speed
1/180000 sec
1/8000

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for wildlife, X-T5 or Alpha 6700?

X-T5 scores 10.0/10 versus 7.0/10 for Alpha 6700 — 20fps burst captures fleeting moments.

What's the resolution difference between the X-T5 and Alpha 6700?

X-T5 is 40.2 MP and Alpha 6700 is 26 MP, so the X-T5 captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the X-T5 and Alpha 6700 have in-body image stabilization?

X-T5 has 7-stop in-body image stabilization, while Alpha 6700 has 5-stop in-body image stabilization.

Which shoots faster bursts — the X-T5 or the Alpha 6700?

X-T5 reaches 20 fps electronic. Alpha 6700 reaches 11 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the X-T5 and Alpha 6700?

X-T5 weighs 557 g and Alpha 6700 weighs 493 g, so the Alpha 6700 is 64 g lighter.

Do the X-T5 and Alpha 6700 record 4K video?

X-T5: 4K up to 60p. Alpha 6700: 4K up to 120p.

Are the X-T5 and Alpha 6700 weather sealed?

X-T5: Yes. Alpha 6700: Yes.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 580 shots (CIPA) for the X-T5 and 550 shots for the Alpha 6700, giving the X-T5 the edge.

How much does each cost?

X-T5 launched at $1,699 and Alpha 6700 at $1,399. The Alpha 6700 is $300 less.

Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.

Add any camera to get a three-way X-T5 vs Alpha 6700 vs X comparison.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed July 2026.

Product images courtesy of Fujifilm and Sony press materials.