Fujifilm
X-T5
40.2MP APS-C flagship with unrivaled still quality and 20 film simulations.
$1,699
Released Nov 2022
Sony
Alpha 6700
26MP APS-C flagship with AI subject tracking, 4K 120p, and 5-stop IBIS.
$1,399
Released Jul 2023
Alpha 6700 is 8 months newer.
Wins
X-T5
Wins
Alpha 6700
TL;DR — Key differences
- BAlpha 6700 has higher ISO max (native) (32,000 vs 12,800)
- BAlpha 6700 has higher 4K max frame rate (120 fps vs 60 fps)
- AX-T5 has higher Card slots (2 vs 1)
- AX-T5 has higher EVF refresh rate (120 Hz vs 60 Hz)
- AX-T5 has higher Burst (electronic) (20 fps vs 11 fps)
Key specs at a glance
Size and weight, to scale
X-T5
130 × 91 × 64 mm
557 g (1.23 lb / 19.65 oz)
Alpha 6700
122 × 69 × 75 mm
493 g (1.09 lb / 17.39 oz)
X-T5 is 11mm thinner than Alpha 6700 but it is also 8mm wider and 22mm taller.
X-T5 is 64 g heavier than Alpha 6700.
Depth (front-to-back): 64mm X-T5 · 75mm Alpha 6700
Sensor size, to scale
X-T5
23.5 × 15.7 mm · APS-C
369 mm² area
Alpha 6700
23.3 × 15.5 mm · APS-C
361 mm² area
Lens ecosystem
Native lens selection
X-T5
Fujifilm X
105+
native lenses available
Alpha 6700
✓ more lensesSony E
350+
native lenses available
Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.
Use-case scoring
Which one for what?
Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class
The verdict
The $300 price gap between these APS-C cameras centers on the Fujifilm X-T5's 40.2-megapixel resolution versus the Sony Alpha 6700's 26-megapixel sensor.
Choose the Fujifilm X-T5 if you prioritize high-detail photography and professional redundancy, as it offers dual SD UHS-II slots and 7 stops of in-body image stabilization. Its 3,690,000 dot EVF and 6.2K video resolution provide higher technical specifications for stills-focused workflows.
Choose the Sony Alpha 6700 if you require high-speed video and extensive autofocus tracking, leveraging its 4K 120p recording and 759-point AI phase-detect system. The fully articulating screen and lighter 493g body make it more suitable for hybrid creators.
Why pick one over the other
Reasons to choose
X-T5
AF low-light limit
-7 EV vs -3 EV — lower is better
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
Adds 129.5, 91, 63.8
Card types
Adds SD UHS-I, SDXC V90
Subject recognition
Adds Automobile, Motorcycle/Bike, Train
Pre-Capture / Pre-Release
Only X-T5 supports it
Internal RAW video
Only X-T5 supports it
Card slots
2 vs 1 — higher is better
EVF refresh rate
120 Hz vs 60 Hz — higher is better
Reasons to choose
Alpha 6700
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
Adds 122, 69, 75.1
ISO max (native)
32,000 vs 12,800 — higher is better
Codecs
Adds XAVC HS, XAVC S, XAVC S-I
Subject recognition
Adds Human, Insect, Car/Train
4K max frame rate
120 fps vs 60 fps — higher is better
AF points / zones
759 vs 425 — higher is better
Max video bit rate
600 Mbps vs 360 Mbps — higher is better
ISO min (native)
100 vs 125 — lower is better
Both cameras share
- ✓Eye AF — Both support eye af
- ✓Animal / bird AF — Both support animal / bird af
- ✓In-body stabilization — Both support in-body stabilization
- ✓Weather sealing — Both support weather sealing
- ✓Touchscreen — Both support touchscreen
- ✓Wi-Fi — Both support wi-fi
Pros & cons at a glance
Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.
X-T5
Pros
- ✓40.2MP APS-C — rivals full-frame for detail
- ✓Compact retro body (557g)
- ✓7-stop IBIS in a small body
- ✓20 film simulations including Velvia, Provia
Cons
- –4K 60p has a 1.29× crop
- –3-way tilt LCD — no full articulation
- –APS-C crop factor (1.5×) for full-frame lenses
Alpha 6700
Pros
- ✓AI-based subject recognition from A7R V
- ✓4K 120p Super35 — outstanding slow-motion
- ✓5-stop IBIS in a compact APS-C body
- ✓10-bit 4:2:2 internal recording
Cons
- –Single card slot
- –APS-C sensor — narrower DR vs. full-frame
- –LCD resolution 1.03M dots — below competitors
- –No headphone jack
Full specifications
✓ = category winner
Frequently asked
Quick answers generated from verified specs.
Which is better for wildlife, X-T5 or Alpha 6700?
X-T5 scores 10.0/10 versus 7.0/10 for Alpha 6700 — 20fps burst captures fleeting moments.
What's the resolution difference between the X-T5 and Alpha 6700?
X-T5 is 40.2 MP and Alpha 6700 is 26 MP, so the X-T5 captures more detail for cropping and large prints.
Do the X-T5 and Alpha 6700 have in-body image stabilization?
X-T5 has 7-stop in-body image stabilization, while alpha 6700 has 5-stop in-body image stabilization.
Which shoots faster bursts — the X-T5 or the Alpha 6700?
X-T5 reaches 20 fps electronic. Alpha 6700 reaches 11 fps electronic.
What's the weight difference between the X-T5 and Alpha 6700?
X-T5 weighs 557 g and Alpha 6700 weighs 493 g, so the Alpha 6700 is 64 g lighter.
Do the X-T5 and Alpha 6700 record 4K video?
X-T5: 4K up to 60p. Alpha 6700: 4K up to 120p.
Are the X-T5 and Alpha 6700 weather sealed?
X-T5: Yes. Alpha 6700: Yes.
Which has better battery life?
Rated battery life is 580 shots (CIPA) for the X-T5 and 570 shots for the Alpha 6700, giving the X-T5 the edge.
How much does each cost?
X-T5 launched at $1,699 and Alpha 6700 at $1,399. The Alpha 6700 is $300 less.
Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed May 2026.