Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg
EOS R8

Canon

EOS R8

Lightest Canon full-frame mirrorless — R6 II AF in a compact, affordable body.

$1,499

Launch price

Released Apr 2023

vs
Alpha 6700

Sony

Alpha 6700

26MP APS-C flagship with AI subject tracking, 4K 120p, and 5-stop IBIS.

$1,399

Launch price

Released Jul 2023

Alpha 6700 is 3 months newer.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Wins

9categories

EOS R8

Sports & ActionWildlife

Wins

7categories

Alpha 6700

TravelSports & Action

3 categories tied

Which would you choose?

TL;DR — Key differences

EOS R8 wins 3 categories·Alpha 6700 wins 2 categories
  • BAlpha 6700 has higher IBIS effectiveness (5 stops vs 0 stops)
  • AEOS R8 has higher AF points / zones (4897 vs 759)
  • BAlpha 6700 has higher Battery life (CIPA) (550 shots vs 150 shots)
  • AEOS R8 has higher Burst (electronic) (40 fps vs 11 fps)
  • AEOS R8 has higher ISO max (native) (102,400 vs 32,000)

Key specs at a glance

EOS R8Alpha 6700
Resolution24.2 MP26 MP
SensorFull FrameAPS-C
ISO max102,40032,000
Burst40 fps11 fps
4K59.94 fps120 fps
IBISNo5-stop
Weight461 g493 g
Battery150 shots550 shots

Size and weight, to scale

EOS R8 front view

EOS R8

133 × 86 × 70 mm

461 g (1.02 lb / 16.26 oz)

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

for scale

Alpha 6700 front view

Alpha 6700

122 × 69 × 75 mm

493 g (1.09 lb / 17.39 oz)

EOS R8 is 5mm thinner than Alpha 6700 but it is also 11mm wider and 17mm taller.

EOS R8 is 32 g lighter than Alpha 6700.

Depth (front-to-back): 70mm EOS R8 · 75mm Alpha 6700

Back view, to scale

Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.

EOS R8 back view

EOS R8

133 × 86 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

Alpha 6700 back view

Alpha 6700

122 × 69 mm

Top view, to scale

Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.

EOS R8 top view

EOS R8

133 × 70 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

Alpha 6700 top view

Alpha 6700

122 × 75 mm

Sensor size, to scale

EOS R8

35.9 × 23.9 mm · Full Frame

858 mm² area

Alpha 6700

23.3 × 15.5 mm · APS-C

361 mm² area

2.4× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

EOS R8

Canon RF

105+

native lenses available

45 first-party60 third-party

Alpha 6700

✓ more lenses

Sony E

350+

native lenses available

80 first-party270 third-party

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseEOS R8Alpha 6700
Portrait
6.5Good
6.5Good
Sports & Action
10.0Excellent✓ wins
8.0Excellent
Video & Hybrid
2.5Limited
5.0Fair✓ wins
Landscape
5.0Fair✓ wins
4.0Fair
Travel
6.0Good
8.5Excellent✓ wins
Wildlife
10.0Excellent✓ wins
7.0Good
Vlogging
5.0Fair
7.5Good✓ wins

The verdict

For a $100 premium, the Canon EOS R8 provides a larger full-frame sensor, whereas the Sony Alpha 6700 includes 5-stop in-body image stabilization.

Choose the Canon EOS R8 if you prioritize low-light performance and high-speed action, as it features a native ISO of 102400 and a 40 fps electronic burst rate. Its Dual Pixel CMOS AF II system also functions down to -6.5 EV for precise focusing in dark environments.

Choose the Sony Alpha 6700 if you require a rugged video-centric hybrid with 5 stops of stabilization and 4K recording at 120 fps. The weather-sealed body and 560-shot battery life make it more reliable for extended outdoor sessions.

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

EOS R8

  • AF low-light limit

    -6.5 EV vs -3 EV — lower is better

  • Codecs

    Adds H.264, H.265, MP4

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 132.59, 86.11, 70.1

  • AF points / zones

    4897 vs 759 — higher is better

  • Burst (electronic)

    40 fps vs 11 fps — higher is better

  • ISO max (native)

    102,400 vs 32,000 — higher is better

  • AA filter

    Only EOS R8 supports it

  • Pre-Capture / Pre-Release

    Only EOS R8 supports it

Reasons to choose

Alpha 6700

  • Codecs

    Adds XAVC HS, XAVC S, XAVC S-I

  • IBIS effectiveness

    5 stops vs 0 stops — higher is better

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 122, 69, 75.1

  • Battery life (CIPA)

    550 shots vs 150 shots — higher is better

  • 4K max frame rate

    120 fps vs 59.94 fps — higher is better

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Insect, Car/Train, Airplane

  • In-body stabilization (IBIS)

    Only Alpha 6700 supports it

  • Burst (mechanical)

    11 fps vs 6 fps — higher is better

Both cameras share

  • ISO min (native)Both 100
  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • Animal / bird AFBoth support animal / bird af
  • Weather sealingBoth support weather sealing
  • Card slotsBoth 1
  • EVF refresh rateBoth 60 Hz

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

EOS R8

Pros

  • 461g — ultralight full-frame body
  • Dual Pixel CMOS AF II (same as R6 II)
  • 4K 60p oversampled — excellent quality
  • Accessible $1,499 price

Cons

  • No in-body stabilization
  • Single SD card slot
  • LP-E17 battery — only 290 CIPA shots
  • USB-C 2.0 — no USB video out

Alpha 6700

Pros

  • AI-based subject recognition from A7R V
  • 4K 120p Super35 — outstanding slow-motion
  • 5-stop IBIS in a compact APS-C body
  • 10-bit 4:2:2 internal recording

Cons

  • Single card slot
  • APS-C sensor — narrower DR vs. full-frame
  • LCD resolution 1.03M dots — below competitors
  • No headphone jack

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the EOS R8 and Alpha 6700 at major authorized retailers.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Full specifications

= category winner

EOS R8
Alpha 6700
Resolution
24.2 MP
26 MP+7%
Sensor type
CMOS
CMOS
Sensor size
35.9 x 23.9 mm
23.3 x 15.5 mm
AA filter
Yes
No
EOS R8
Alpha 6700
Processor
DIGIC X
BIONZ XR + AI processing unit
EOS R8
Alpha 6700
ISO min (native)
100
100
ISO max (native)
102,400+1.7 stops
32,000
ISO max (expanded)
204,800
102,400
EOS R8
Alpha 6700
Shutter type
Mechanical Focal Plane Shutter and Electronic Rolling Shutter
Mechanical Focal Plane Shutter and Electronic Rolling Shutter
Max mechanical speed
1/4000
1/4000
Max electronic speed
1/16000
1/8000

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for wildlife, EOS R8 or Alpha 6700?

EOS R8 scores 10.0/10 versus 7.0/10 for Alpha 6700 — 40fps burst captures fleeting moments.

What's the resolution difference between the EOS R8 and Alpha 6700?

EOS R8 is 24.2 MP and Alpha 6700 is 26 MP, so the Alpha 6700 captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the EOS R8 and Alpha 6700 have in-body image stabilization?

EOS R8 does not have IBIS, while Alpha 6700 has 5-stop in-body image stabilization.

Which shoots faster bursts — the EOS R8 or the Alpha 6700?

EOS R8 reaches 40 fps electronic. Alpha 6700 reaches 11 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the EOS R8 and Alpha 6700?

EOS R8 weighs 461 g and Alpha 6700 weighs 493 g, so the EOS R8 is 32 g lighter.

Do the EOS R8 and Alpha 6700 record 4K video?

EOS R8: 4K up to 59.94p. Alpha 6700: 4K up to 120p.

Are the EOS R8 and Alpha 6700 weather sealed?

EOS R8: Yes. Alpha 6700: Yes.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 150 shots (CIPA) for the EOS R8 and 550 shots for the Alpha 6700, giving the Alpha 6700 the edge.

How much does each cost?

EOS R8 launched at $1,499 and Alpha 6700 at $1,399. The Alpha 6700 is $100 less.

Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.

Add any camera to get a three-way EOS R8 vs Alpha 6700 vs X comparison.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed July 2026.

Product images courtesy of Canon and Sony press materials.