Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg
EOS R5 Mark II

Canon

EOS R5 Mark II

45MP stacked-sensor powerhouse with 8K 60p RAW internal and 30fps burst.

$4,299

Launch price

Released Jul 2024

vs
EOS R8

Canon

EOS R8

Lightest Canon full-frame mirrorless — R6 II AF in a compact, affordable body.

$1,499

Launch price

Released Apr 2023

EOS R5 Mark II is 1.3 years newer.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Wins

11categories

EOS R5 Mark II

Sports & ActionVideo & Hybrid

Wins

4categories

EOS R8

Sports & ActionWildlife

3 categories tied

Which would you choose?

TL;DR — Key differences

EOS R5 Mark II wins 4 categories·EOS R8 wins 1 categories
  • AEOS R5 Mark II has higher IBIS effectiveness (8.5 stops vs 0 stops)
  • AEOS R5 Mark II has higher RAW buffer depth (600 frames vs 56 frames)
  • AEOS R5 Mark II has higher Max video bit rate (2600 Mbps vs 340 Mbps)
  • BEOS R8 has higher AF points / zones (4897 vs 1053)
  • AEOS R5 Mark II has higher EVF resolution (5,760,000 vs 2,360,000)

Key specs at a glance

EOS R5 Mark IIEOS R8
Resolution45 MP24.2 MP
SensorFull FrameFull Frame
ISO max51,200102,400
Burst30 fps40 fps
4K120 fps59.94 fps
IBIS8.5-stopNo
Weight746 g461 g
Battery320 shots150 shots

Size and weight, to scale

EOS R5 Mark II front view

EOS R5 Mark II

139 × 101 × 94 mm

746 g (1.64 lb / 26.31 oz)

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

for scale

EOS R8 front view

EOS R8

133 × 86 × 70 mm

461 g (1.02 lb / 16.26 oz)

EOS R5 Mark II is 6mm wider, 15mm taller, and 23mm thicker than EOS R8.

EOS R5 Mark II is 285 g heavier than EOS R8.

Depth (front-to-back): 94mm EOS R5 Mark II · 70mm EOS R8

Back view, to scale

Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.

EOS R5 Mark II back view

EOS R5 Mark II

139 × 101 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

EOS R8 back view

EOS R8

133 × 86 mm

Top view, to scale

Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.

EOS R5 Mark II top view

EOS R5 Mark II

139 × 94 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

EOS R8 top view

EOS R8

133 × 70 mm

Sensor size, to scale

EOS R5 Mark II

36 × 24 mm · Full Frame

864 mm² area

EOS R8

35.9 × 23.9 mm · Full Frame

858 mm² area

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

EOS R5 Mark II

✓ more lenses

Canon RF

105+

native lenses available

45 first-party60 third-party

EOS R8

✓ more lenses

Canon RF

105+

native lenses available

45 first-party60 third-party

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseEOS R5 Mark IIEOS R8
Portrait
8.5Excellent✓ wins
6.5Good
Sports & Action
10.0Excellent
10.0Excellent
Video & Hybrid
9.5Excellent✓ wins
2.5Limited
Landscape
8.5Excellent✓ wins
5.0Fair
Travel
5.5Fair
6.0Good✓ wins
Wildlife
6.5Good
10.0Excellent✓ wins
Vlogging
5.5Fair✓ wins
5.0Fair

The verdict

The $2,800 price gap separates a professional 45-megapixel camera featuring 8-stop in-body image stabilization and 8K DCI video from a compact, entry-level full-frame body without internal stabilization.

Choose the Canon EOS R5 Mark II if you require a high-performance tool for demanding commercial work or wildlife, as its stacked sensor, 600-shot RAW buffer, and weather-sealed body provide the necessary speed and durability.

Choose the Canon EOS R8 if you prioritize portability and value for travel or street photography, as it offers a lightweight 461-gram frame and 40 fps electronic burst shooting at a significantly lower cost.

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

EOS R5 Mark II

  • Subject recognition

    Adds People, Dogs, Cats…

  • IBIS effectiveness

    8.5 stops vs 0 stops — higher is better

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 138.5, 101.2, 93.5

  • Card types

    Adds CFexpress Type B, SD UHS-II

  • RAW buffer depth

    600 frames vs 56 frames — higher is better

  • Max video bit rate

    2600 Mbps vs 340 Mbps — higher is better

  • Codecs

    Adds RAW, XF-HEVC S, XF-AVC S

  • EVF resolution

    5,760,000 vs 2,360,000 — higher is better

Reasons to choose

EOS R8

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Human, Animal, Bird…

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 132.59, 86.11, 70.1

  • Card types

    Adds SD, SDHC, SDXC

  • AF points / zones

    4897 vs 1053 — higher is better

  • ISO max (native)

    102,400 vs 51,200 — higher is better

  • Weight

    461 g vs 746 g — lower is better

  • Codecs

    Adds MP4

  • Burst (electronic)

    40 fps vs 30 fps — higher is better

Both cameras share

  • AA filterBoth support aa filter
  • ISO min (native)Both 100
  • AF frame coverageBoth 100 %
  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • Animal / bird AFBoth support animal / bird af
  • Pre-Capture / Pre-ReleaseBoth support pre-capture / pre-release

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

EOS R5 Mark II

Pros

  • 45MP stacked CMOS — speed and resolution
  • 8K 60p RAW internal recording
  • 30fps electronic burst at full 45MP
  • 5.76M dot EVF

Cons

  • Premium $4,299 price
  • Short battery life (320 CIPA shots)
  • Body heat in extended 8K sessions

EOS R8

Pros

  • 461g — ultralight full-frame body
  • Dual Pixel CMOS AF II (same as R6 II)
  • 4K 60p oversampled — excellent quality
  • Accessible $1,499 price

Cons

  • No in-body stabilization
  • Single SD card slot
  • LP-E17 battery — only 290 CIPA shots
  • USB-C 2.0 — no USB video out

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the EOS R5 Mark II and EOS R8 at major authorized retailers.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Full specifications

= category winner

EOS R5 Mark II
EOS R8
Resolution
45 MP+86%
24.2 MP
Sensor type
Full Frame Stacked BSI CMOS
CMOS
Sensor size
36.0 × 24.0 mm
35.9 x 23.9 mm
AA filter
Yes
Yes
EOS R5 Mark II
EOS R8
Processor
DIGIC Accelerator + DIGIC X
DIGIC X
EOS R5 Mark II
EOS R8
ISO min (native)
100
100
ISO max (native)
51,200
102,400+1 stop
ISO max (expanded)
102,400
204,800
EOS R5 Mark II
EOS R8
Shutter type
Mechanical + Electronic
Mechanical Focal Plane Shutter and Electronic Rolling Shutter
Max mechanical speed
1/8000 sec
1/4000
Max electronic speed
1/32000 sec
1/16000

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for video, EOS R5 Mark II or EOS R8?

EOS R5 Mark II scores 9.5/10 versus 2.5/10 for EOS R8 — 8K recording for future-proof footage.

What's the resolution difference between the EOS R5 Mark II and EOS R8?

EOS R5 Mark II is 45 MP and EOS R8 is 24.2 MP, so the EOS R5 Mark II captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the EOS R5 Mark II and EOS R8 have in-body image stabilization?

EOS R5 Mark II has 8.5-stop in-body image stabilization, while EOS R8 does not have IBIS.

Which shoots faster bursts — the EOS R5 Mark II or the EOS R8?

EOS R5 Mark II reaches 30 fps electronic. EOS R8 reaches 40 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the EOS R5 Mark II and EOS R8?

EOS R5 Mark II weighs 746 g and EOS R8 weighs 461 g, so the EOS R8 is 285 g lighter.

Do the EOS R5 Mark II and EOS R8 record 4K video?

EOS R5 Mark II: 8K RAW (max), 4K up to 120p. EOS R8: 4K up to 59.94p.

Are the EOS R5 Mark II and EOS R8 weather sealed?

EOS R5 Mark II: Yes. EOS R8: Yes.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 320 shots (CIPA) for the EOS R5 Mark II and 150 shots for the EOS R8, giving the EOS R5 Mark II the edge.

How much does each cost?

EOS R5 Mark II launched at $4,299 and EOS R8 at $1,499. The EOS R8 is $2,800 less.

Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.

Add any camera to get a three-way EOS R5 Mark II vs EOS R8 vs X comparison.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed July 2026.

Product images courtesy of Canon press materials.