Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg Compare
EOS R5 Mark II

Canon

EOS R5 Mark II

45MP stacked-sensor powerhouse with 8K 60p RAW internal and 30fps burst.

$4,299

Released Jul 2024

vs

Canon

EOS R8

Lightest Canon full-frame mirrorless — R6 II AF in a compact, affordable body.

$1,499

Released Apr 2023

EOS R5 Mark II is 1.3 years newer.

Wins

11categories

EOS R5 Mark II

Sports & ActionVideo & Hybrid

Wins

4categories

EOS R8

WildlifeSports & Action

3 categories tied

TL;DR — Key differences

EOS R5 Mark II wins 4 categories·EOS R8 wins 1 categories
  • AEOS R5 Mark II has higher IBIS effectiveness (8.5 stops vs 0 stops)
  • AEOS R5 Mark II has higher Max video bit rate (2600 Mbps vs 180 Mbps)
  • AEOS R5 Mark II has higher RAW buffer depth (600 frames vs 70 frames)
  • BEOS R8 has higher AF points / zones (4897 vs 1053)
  • AEOS R5 Mark II has higher EVF resolution (5,760,000 vs 2,360,000)

Key specs at a glance

EOS R5 Mark IIEOS R8
Resolution45 MP24.2 MP
SensorFull FrameFull Frame
ISO max51,200102,400
Burst30 fps40 fps
4K120 fps60 fps
IBIS8.5-stopNo
Weight746 g461 g
Battery320 shots290 shots

Size and weight, to scale

EOS R5 Mark II front view

EOS R5 Mark II

138 × 101 × 94 mm

746 g (1.64 lb / 26.31 oz)

EOS R8

133 × 86 × 70 mm

461 g (1.02 lb / 16.26 oz)

EOS R5 Mark II is 6mm wider, 15mm taller, and 24mm thicker than EOS R8.

EOS R5 Mark II is 285 g heavier than EOS R8.

Depth (front-to-back): 94mm EOS R5 Mark II · 70mm EOS R8

Back view, to scale

Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.

EOS R5 Mark II back view

EOS R5 Mark II

138 × 101 mm

EOS R8

133 × 86 mm

Top view, to scale

Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.

EOS R5 Mark II top view

EOS R5 Mark II

138 × 94 mm

EOS R8

133 × 70 mm

Sensor size, to scale

EOS R5 Mark II

36 × 24 mm · Full Frame

864 mm² area

EOS R8

35.9 × 23.9 mm · Full Frame

858 mm² area

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

EOS R5 Mark II

✓ more lenses

Canon RF

105+

native lenses available

45 first-party60 third-party

EOS R8

✓ more lenses

Canon RF

105+

native lenses available

45 first-party60 third-party

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseEOS R5 Mark IIEOS R8
Portrait
8.5Excellent✓ wins
7.5Good
Sports & Action
9.5Excellent✓ wins
8.5Excellent
Video & Hybrid
9.5Excellent✓ wins
4.5Fair
Landscape
8.5Excellent✓ wins
5.0Fair
Travel
5.5Fair
6.0Good✓ wins
Wildlife
6.5Good
10.0Excellent✓ wins
Vlogging
5.5Fair
8.5Excellent✓ wins

The verdict

The $2,800 price gap separates a professional 45-megapixel camera featuring 8-stop in-body image stabilization and 8K DCI video from a compact, entry-level full-frame body without internal stabilization.

Choose the Canon EOS R5 Mark II if you require a high-performance tool for demanding commercial work or wildlife, as its stacked sensor, 600-shot RAW buffer, and weather-sealed body provide the necessary speed and durability.

Choose the Canon EOS R8 if you prioritize portability and value for travel or street photography, as it offers a lightweight 461-gram frame and 40 fps electronic burst shooting at a significantly lower cost.

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

EOS R5 Mark II

  • Subject recognition

    Adds People, Dogs, Cats…

  • IBIS effectiveness

    8.5 stops vs 0 stops — higher is better

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 138.4, 101.2, 93.5

  • Max video bit rate

    2600 Mbps vs 180 Mbps — higher is better

  • RAW buffer depth

    600 frames vs 70 frames — higher is better

  • Codecs

    Adds RAW, XF-HEVC S, XF-AVC S

  • EVF resolution

    5,760,000 vs 2,360,000 — higher is better

  • Burst (mechanical)

    12 fps vs 6 fps — higher is better

Reasons to choose

EOS R8

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Human, Animal, Bird…

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 132.5, 86.1, 70

  • AF points / zones

    4897 vs 1053 — higher is better

  • ISO max (native)

    102,400 vs 51,200 — higher is better

  • Weight

    461 g vs 746 g — lower is better

  • Burst (electronic)

    40 fps vs 30 fps — higher is better

Both cameras share

  • AA filterBoth support aa filter
  • ISO min (native)Both 100
  • AF frame coverageBoth 100 %
  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • Animal / bird AFBoth support animal / bird af
  • Pre-Capture / Pre-ReleaseBoth support pre-capture / pre-release

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

EOS R5 Mark II

Pros

  • 45MP stacked CMOS — speed and resolution
  • 8K 60p RAW internal recording
  • 30fps electronic burst at full 45MP
  • 5.76M dot EVF

Cons

  • Premium $4,299 price
  • Short battery life (320 CIPA shots)
  • Body heat in extended 8K sessions

EOS R8

Pros

  • 461g — ultralight full-frame body
  • Dual Pixel CMOS AF II (same as R6 II)
  • 4K 60p oversampled — excellent quality
  • Accessible $1,499 price

Cons

  • No in-body stabilization
  • Single SD card slot
  • LP-E17 battery — only 290 CIPA shots
  • USB-C 2.0 — no USB video out

Full specifications

= category winner

EOS R5 Mark II
EOS R8
Resolution
45 MP+86%
24.2 MP
Sensor type
Full Frame Stacked BSI CMOS
Full Frame CMOS
Sensor size
36.0 × 24.0 mm
35.9 × 23.9 mm
AA filter
Yes
Yes
EOS R5 Mark II
EOS R8
AF system
Dual Pixel Intelligent AF
Dual Pixel CMOS AF II
AF points / zones
1053
48974.7× more
AF frame coverage
100 %
100 %
AF low-light limit
-6.5 EV
-6.5 EV
Eye AF
Yes
Yes
Animal / bird AF
Yes
Yes
Subject recognition
People, Dogs, Cats, Birds, Horses, Cars, Motorbikes, Aircraft, Trains
Human, Animal, Bird, Vehicle
EOS R5 Mark II
EOS R8
Burst (mechanical)
12 fps2× more
6 fps
Burst (electronic)
30 fps
40 fps+33%
Pre-Capture / Pre-Release
Yes
Yes
RAW buffer depth
600 frames8.6× more
70 frames
EOS R5 Mark II
EOS R8
Max resolution
8K RAW
4K UHD
4K max frame rate
120 fps2× more
60 fps
Max video bit rate
2600 Mbps14.4× more
180 Mbps
Internal RAW video
Yes
No
Log profile
Canon Log 2 / Canon Log 3 / HDR PQ
Canon Log 3 / HDR PQ
Codecs
RAW, XF-HEVC S, XF-AVC S, H.265, H.264
H.265, H.264
EOS R5 Mark II
EOS R8
Weight
746 g
461 g−285 g less
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
138.4 × 101.2 × 93.5 mm
132.5 × 86.1 × 70 mm
Weather sealing
Yes
Yes

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for video, EOS R5 Mark II or EOS R8?

EOS R5 Mark II scores 9.5/10 versus 4.5/10 for EOS R8 — 8K recording for future-proof footage.

What's the resolution difference between the EOS R5 Mark II and EOS R8?

EOS R5 Mark II is 45 MP and EOS R8 is 24.2 MP, so the EOS R5 Mark II captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the EOS R5 Mark II and EOS R8 have in-body image stabilization?

EOS R5 Mark II has 8.5-stop in-body image stabilization, while eOS R8 does not have IBIS.

Which shoots faster bursts — the EOS R5 Mark II or the EOS R8?

EOS R5 Mark II reaches 30 fps electronic. EOS R8 reaches 40 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the EOS R5 Mark II and EOS R8?

EOS R5 Mark II weighs 746 g and EOS R8 weighs 461 g, so the EOS R8 is 285 g lighter.

Do the EOS R5 Mark II and EOS R8 record 4K video?

EOS R5 Mark II: 8K RAW (max), 4K up to 120p. EOS R8: 4K up to 60p.

Are the EOS R5 Mark II and EOS R8 weather sealed?

EOS R5 Mark II: Yes. EOS R8: Yes.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 320 shots (CIPA) for the EOS R5 Mark II and 290 shots for the EOS R8, giving the EOS R5 Mark II the edge.

How much does each cost?

EOS R5 Mark II launched at $4,299 and EOS R8 at $1,499. The EOS R8 is $2,800 less.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed May 2026.

Product images courtesy of Canon press materials.