Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg
EOS R1

Canon

EOS R1

Flagship 24.2MP full-frame BSI stacked RF body with 40fps burst, Dual Pixel Intelligent AF, 6K RAW, and 9.44M-dot EVF.

$6,299

Launch price

Released Jul 2024

vs
Alpha 6700

Sony

Alpha 6700

26MP APS-C flagship with AI subject tracking, 4K 120p, and 5-stop IBIS.

$1,399

Launch price

Released Jul 2023

EOS R1 is 1 year newer.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Wins

10categories

EOS R1

Sports & ActionVideo & Hybrid

Wins

3categories

Alpha 6700

TravelSports & Action

2 categories tied

Which would you choose?

TL;DR — Key differences

EOS R1 wins 5 categories·Alpha 6700 wins 0 categories
  • AEOS R1 has higher EVF resolution (9,440,000 vs 2,359,296)
  • AEOS R1 has higher Burst (electronic) (40 fps vs 11 fps)
  • AEOS R1 has higher ISO max (native) (102,400 vs 32,000)
  • AEOS R1 has higher Battery life (CIPA) (1330 shots vs 550 shots)
  • AEOS R1 has higher Card slots (2 vs 1)

Key specs at a glance

EOS R1Alpha 6700
Resolution24.2 MP26 MP
SensorFull FrameAPS-C
ISO max102,40032,000
Burst40 fps11 fps
4K120 fps120 fps
IBIS8.5-stop5-stop
Weight920 g493 g
Battery1330 shots550 shots

Size and weight, to scale

EOS R1 front view

EOS R1

158 × 150 × 87 mm

920 g (2.03 lb / 32.45 oz)

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

for scale

Alpha 6700 front view

Alpha 6700

122 × 69 × 75 mm

493 g (1.09 lb / 17.39 oz)

EOS R1 is 36mm wider, 81mm taller, and 12mm thicker than Alpha 6700.

EOS R1 is 427 g heavier than Alpha 6700.

Depth (front-to-back): 87mm EOS R1 · 75mm Alpha 6700

Back view, to scale

Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.

EOS R1 back view

EOS R1

158 × 150 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

Alpha 6700 back view

Alpha 6700

122 × 69 mm

Top view, to scale

Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.

EOS R1 top view

EOS R1

158 × 87 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

Alpha 6700 top view

Alpha 6700

122 × 75 mm

Sensor size, to scale

EOS R1

36 × 24 mm · Full Frame

864 mm² area

Alpha 6700

23.3 × 15.5 mm · APS-C

361 mm² area

2.4× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

EOS R1

Canon RF

105+

native lenses available

45 first-party60 third-party

Alpha 6700

✓ more lenses

Sony E

350+

native lenses available

80 first-party270 third-party

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseEOS R1Alpha 6700
Portrait
7.5Good✓ wins
6.5Good
Sports & Action
10.0Excellent✓ wins
8.0Excellent
Video & Hybrid
9.0Excellent✓ wins
5.0Fair
Landscape
7.0Good✓ wins
4.0Fair
Travel
6.5Good
8.5Excellent✓ wins
Wildlife
6.5Good
7.0Good✓ wins
Vlogging
5.5Fair
7.5Good✓ wins

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

EOS R1

  • AF low-light limit

    -7.5 EV vs -3 EV — lower is better

  • Subject recognition

    Adds People, Dogs, Cats…

  • Codecs

    Adds RAW, XF-HEVC S, XF-AVC S…

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 157.6, 149.5, 87.3

  • Card types

    Adds CFexpress Type B, CFexpress Type B

  • EVF resolution

    9,440,000 vs 2,359,296 — higher is better

  • Burst (electronic)

    40 fps vs 11 fps — higher is better

  • ISO max (native)

    102,400 vs 32,000 — higher is better

Reasons to choose

Alpha 6700

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Human, Animal, Bird…

  • Codecs

    Adds XAVC HS, XAVC S, XAVC S-I

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 122, 69, 75.1

  • Card types

    Adds SD, SDHC, SDXC

  • Weight

    493 g vs 920 g — lower is better

  • EVF magnification

    1.07 × vs 0.9 × — higher is better

  • Resolution

    26 MP vs 24.2 MP — higher is better

Both cameras share

  • ISO min (native)Both 100
  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • Animal / bird AFBoth support animal / bird af
  • 4K max frame rateBoth 120 fps
  • In-body stabilization (IBIS)Both support in-body stabilization (ibis)
  • Weather sealingBoth support weather sealing

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

EOS R1

Pros

  • 40fps electronic burst
  • 24.2MP BSI stacked full-frame sensor
  • Dual Pixel Intelligent AF
  • 6K RAW and 4K 120p video
  • Dual CFexpress Type B slots

Cons

  • 24MP resolution
  • Very expensive
  • Large integrated-grip body

Alpha 6700

Pros

  • AI-based subject recognition from A7R V
  • 4K 120p Super35 — outstanding slow-motion
  • 5-stop IBIS in a compact APS-C body
  • 10-bit 4:2:2 internal recording

Cons

  • Single card slot
  • APS-C sensor — narrower DR vs. full-frame
  • LCD resolution 1.03M dots — below competitors
  • No headphone jack

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the EOS R1 and Alpha 6700 at major authorized retailers.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Full specifications

= category winner

EOS R1
Alpha 6700
Resolution
24.2 MP
26 MP+7%
Sensor type
Full Frame BSI Stacked CMOS
CMOS
Sensor size
36.0 × 24.0 mm
23.3 x 15.5 mm
AA filter
Yes
No
EOS R1
Alpha 6700
Processor
DIGIC Accelerator + DIGIC X
BIONZ XR + AI processing unit
EOS R1
Alpha 6700
ISO min (native)
100
100
ISO max (native)
102,400+1.7 stops
32,000
ISO max (expanded)
409,600
102,400
EOS R1
Alpha 6700
Shutter type
Mechanical + Electronic
Mechanical Focal Plane Shutter and Electronic Rolling Shutter
Max mechanical speed
1/8000 sec
1/4000
Max electronic speed
1/64000 sec
1/8000

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for video, EOS R1 or Alpha 6700?

EOS R1 scores 9.0/10 versus 5.0/10 for Alpha 6700 — 6K video for oversampled 4K.

What's the resolution difference between the EOS R1 and Alpha 6700?

EOS R1 is 24.2 MP and Alpha 6700 is 26 MP, so the Alpha 6700 captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the EOS R1 and Alpha 6700 have in-body image stabilization?

EOS R1 has 8.5-stop in-body image stabilization, while Alpha 6700 has 5-stop in-body image stabilization.

Which shoots faster bursts — the EOS R1 or the Alpha 6700?

EOS R1 reaches 40 fps electronic. Alpha 6700 reaches 11 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the EOS R1 and Alpha 6700?

EOS R1 weighs 920 g and Alpha 6700 weighs 493 g, so the Alpha 6700 is 427 g lighter.

Do the EOS R1 and Alpha 6700 record 4K video?

EOS R1: 6K RAW (max), 4K up to 120p. Alpha 6700: 4K up to 120p.

Are the EOS R1 and Alpha 6700 weather sealed?

EOS R1: Yes. Alpha 6700: Yes.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 1,330 shots (CIPA) for the EOS R1 and 550 shots for the Alpha 6700, giving the EOS R1 the edge.

How much does each cost?

EOS R1 launched at $6,299 and Alpha 6700 at $1,399. The Alpha 6700 is $4,900 less.

Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.

Add any camera to get a three-way EOS R1 vs Alpha 6700 vs X comparison.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed July 2026.

Product images courtesy of Canon and Sony press materials.