Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg
Alpha 6700

Sony

Alpha 6700

26MP APS-C flagship with AI subject tracking, 4K 120p, and 5-stop IBIS.

$1,399

Launch price

Released Jul 2023

vs

Sony

Alpha 9 III

Global shutter sports flagship with 120fps and zero rolling shutter for pro action.

$5,999

Launch price

Released Jan 2024

Alpha 9 III is 6 months newer.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Wins

7categories

Alpha 6700

TravelSports & Action

Wins

9categories

Alpha 9 III

Sports & ActionWildlife

2 categories tied

Which would you choose?

TL;DR — Key differences

Alpha 6700 wins 1 categories·Alpha 9 III wins 4 categories
  • AAlpha 6700 has higher Burst (mechanical) (11 fps vs 0 fps)
  • BAlpha 9 III has higher Burst (electronic) (120 fps vs 11 fps)
  • BAlpha 9 III has higher EVF resolution (9,437,184 vs 2,359,296)
  • BAlpha 9 III has higher EVF refresh rate (240 Hz vs 60 Hz)
  • BAlpha 9 III has higher RAW buffer depth (200 frames vs 59 frames)

Key specs at a glance

Alpha 6700Alpha 9 III
Resolution26 MP24.6 MP
SensorAPS-CFull Frame
ISO max32,00025,600
Burst11 fps120 fps
4K120 fps120 fps
IBIS5-stop8-stop
Weight493 g703 g
Battery550 shots400 shots

Size and weight, to scale

Alpha 6700 front view

Alpha 6700

122 × 69 × 75 mm

493 g (1.09 lb / 17.39 oz)

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

for scale

Alpha 9 III

136 × 97 × 83 mm

703 g (1.55 lb / 24.80 oz)

Alpha 6700 is 14mm narrower, 28mm shorter, and 8mm thinner than Alpha 9 III.

Alpha 6700 is 210 g lighter than Alpha 9 III.

Depth (front-to-back): 75mm Alpha 6700 · 83mm Alpha 9 III

Back view, to scale

Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.

Alpha 6700 back view

Alpha 6700

122 × 69 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

Alpha 9 III

136 × 97 mm

Top view, to scale

Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.

Alpha 6700 top view

Alpha 6700

122 × 75 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

Alpha 9 III

136 × 83 mm

Sensor size, to scale

Alpha 6700

23.3 × 15.5 mm · APS-C

361 mm² area

Alpha 9 III

35.6 × 23.8 mm · Full Frame

847 mm² area

2.3× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

Alpha 6700

✓ more lenses

Sony E

350+

native lenses available

80 first-party270 third-party

Alpha 9 III

✓ more lenses

Sony E

350+

native lenses available

80 first-party270 third-party

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseAlpha 6700Alpha 9 III
Portrait
6.5Good
7.5Good✓ wins
Sports & Action
8.0Excellent
10.0Excellent✓ wins
Video & Hybrid
5.0Fair
8.0Excellent✓ wins
Landscape
4.0Fair
7.0Good✓ wins
Travel
8.5Excellent✓ wins
7.0Good
Wildlife
7.0Good
9.5Excellent✓ wins
Vlogging
7.5Good✓ wins
5.5Fair

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

Alpha 6700

  • Burst (mechanical)

    11 fps vs 0 fps — higher is better

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 122, 69, 75.1

  • Card types

    Adds SD, SDHC, SDXC

  • ISO min (native)

    100 vs 250 — lower is better

  • Weight

    493 g vs 703 g — lower is better

  • Battery life (CIPA)

    550 shots vs 400 shots — higher is better

  • ISO max (native)

    32,000 vs 25,600 — higher is better

  • EVF magnification

    1.07 × vs 0.9 × — higher is better

Reasons to choose

Alpha 9 III

  • AF low-light limit

    -5 EV vs -3 EV — lower is better

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 136.1, 96.9, 82.9

  • Card types

    Adds CFexpress Type A, SD UHS-II

  • Burst (electronic)

    120 fps vs 11 fps — higher is better

  • EVF resolution

    9,437,184 vs 2,359,296 — higher is better

  • EVF refresh rate

    240 Hz vs 60 Hz — higher is better

  • RAW buffer depth

    200 frames vs 59 frames — higher is better

  • Max video bit rate

    600 Mbps vs 280 Mbps — higher is better

Both cameras share

  • AF points / zonesBoth 759
  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • Animal / bird AFBoth support animal / bird af
  • 4K max frame rateBoth 120 fps
  • In-body stabilization (IBIS)Both support in-body stabilization (ibis)
  • Weather sealingBoth support weather sealing

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

Alpha 6700

Pros

  • AI-based subject recognition from A7R V
  • 4K 120p Super35 — outstanding slow-motion
  • 5-stop IBIS in a compact APS-C body
  • 10-bit 4:2:2 internal recording

Cons

  • Single card slot
  • APS-C sensor — narrower DR vs. full-frame
  • LCD resolution 1.03M dots — below competitors
  • No headphone jack

Alpha 9 III

Pros

  • Global shutter 120fps
  • Zero rolling shutter
  • Pro sports AF
  • Pre-capture buffer

Cons

  • 24.6MP only
  • Premium price
  • Battery drain at max speed

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the Alpha 6700 and Alpha 9 III at major authorized retailers.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Full specifications

= category winner

Alpha 6700
Alpha 9 III
Resolution
26 MP+6%
24.6 MP
Sensor type
CMOS
Full Frame Global Shutter Exmor RS CMOS
Sensor size
23.3 x 15.5 mm
35.6 × 23.8 mm
AA filter
No
Yes
Alpha 6700
Alpha 9 III
Processor
BIONZ XR + AI processing unit
BIONZ XR + AI processing unit
Alpha 6700
Alpha 9 III
ISO min (native)
100−150 less
250
ISO max (native)
32,000+0.3 stops
25,600
ISO max (expanded)
102,400
51,200
Alpha 6700
Alpha 9 III
Shutter type
Mechanical Focal Plane Shutter and Electronic Rolling Shutter
Global electronic shutter
Max mechanical speed
1/4000
Max electronic speed
1/8000
1/80000 sec

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for video, Alpha 6700 or Alpha 9 III?

Alpha 9 III scores 8.0/10 versus 5.0/10 for Alpha 6700 — 4K recording.

What's the resolution difference between the Alpha 6700 and Alpha 9 III?

Alpha 6700 is 26 MP and Alpha 9 III is 24.6 MP, so the Alpha 6700 captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the Alpha 6700 and Alpha 9 III have in-body image stabilization?

Alpha 6700 has 5-stop in-body image stabilization, while Alpha 9 III has 8-stop in-body image stabilization.

Which shoots faster bursts — the Alpha 6700 or the Alpha 9 III?

Alpha 6700 reaches 11 fps electronic. Alpha 9 III reaches 120 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the Alpha 6700 and Alpha 9 III?

Alpha 6700 weighs 493 g and Alpha 9 III weighs 703 g, so the Alpha 6700 is 210 g lighter.

Do the Alpha 6700 and Alpha 9 III record 4K video?

Alpha 6700: 4K up to 120p. Alpha 9 III: 4K up to 120p.

Are the Alpha 6700 and Alpha 9 III weather sealed?

Alpha 6700: Yes. Alpha 9 III: Yes.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 550 shots (CIPA) for the Alpha 6700 and 400 shots for the Alpha 9 III, giving the Alpha 6700 the edge.

How much does each cost?

Alpha 6700 launched at $1,399 and Alpha 9 III at $5,999. The Alpha 6700 is $4,600 less.

Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.

Add any camera to get a three-way Alpha 6700 vs Alpha 9 III vs X comparison.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed July 2026.

Product images courtesy of Sony press materials.