Fujifilm
X-T3
APS-C hybrid that put Fujifilm on the video map with 10-bit internal 4K.
$1,499
Released Sep 2018
Fujifilm
X100V
Previous-gen fixed 23mm f/2 street camera — still hugely popular and hard to find.
$1,399
Released Feb 2020
X100V is 1.4 years newer.
Wins
X-T3
Wins
X100V
9 categories tied
TL;DR — Key differences
- AX-T3 has higher RAW buffer depth (36 frames vs 17 frames)
- AX-T3 has higher 4K max frame rate (60 fps vs 30 fps)
- AX-T3 has higher Max video bit rate (400 Mbps vs 200 Mbps)
- AX-T3 has higher Card slots (2 vs 1)
- AX-T3 has higher EVF magnification (0.75 × vs 0.66 ×)
Key specs at a glance
Size and weight, to scale
X-T3
133 × 93 × 59 mm
539 g (1.19 lb / 19.01 oz)
X100V
128 × 75 × 53 mm
478 g (1.05 lb / 16.86 oz)
X-T3 is 5mm wider, 18mm taller, and 6mm thicker than X100V.
X-T3 is 61 g heavier than X100V.
Depth (front-to-back): 59mm X-T3 · 53mm X100V
Sensor size, to scale
X-T3
23.5 × 15.6 mm · APS-C
367 mm² area
X100V
23.5 × 15.6 mm · APS-C
367 mm² area
Lens ecosystem
Native lens selection
X-T3
✓ more lensesFujifilm X
105+
native lenses available
X100V: mount data unavailable
Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.
Use-case scoring
Which one for what?
Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class
Why pick one over the other
Reasons to choose
X-T3
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
Adds 132.5, 92.8, 58.8
Card types
Adds SD UHS-II
RAW buffer depth
36 frames vs 17 frames — higher is better
4K max frame rate
60 fps vs 30 fps — higher is better
Max video bit rate
400 Mbps vs 200 Mbps — higher is better
Codecs
Adds H.265
Card slots
2 vs 1 — higher is better
Headphone jack (3.5mm)
Only X-T3 supports it
Reasons to choose
X100V
AF low-light limit
-5 EV vs -3 EV — lower is better
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
Adds 128, 74.8, 53.3
Card types
Adds SD UHS-I
Weight
478 g vs 539 g — lower is better
Both cameras share
- ✓Resolution — Both 26.1 MP
- ✓ISO min (native) — Both 160
- ✓ISO max (native) — Both 12,800
- ✓AF points / zones — Both 425
- ✓AF frame coverage — Both 100 %
- ✓Eye AF — Both support eye af
Pros & cons at a glance
Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.
X-T3
Pros
- ✓10-bit 4K internal
- ✓26MP
- ✓Great used value
Cons
- –No IBIS
- –Superseded
- –APS-C
X100V
Pros
- ✓Classic design
- ✓Leaf shutter
- ✓Film simulations
- ✓Proven street camera
Cons
- –Superseded by X100VI
- –Fixed lens
- –No IBIS
Full specifications
✓ = category winner
Frequently asked
Quick answers generated from verified specs.
Which is better for video, X-T3 or X100V?
X-T3 scores 5.0/10 versus 3.5/10 for X100V — 4K recording.
What's the resolution difference between the X-T3 and X100V?
Both cameras share the same 26.1 MP resolution.
Do the X-T3 and X100V have in-body image stabilization?
X-T3 does not have IBIS, while x100V does not have IBIS.
Which shoots faster bursts — the X-T3 or the X100V?
X-T3 reaches 30 fps electronic. X100V reaches 30 fps electronic.
What's the weight difference between the X-T3 and X100V?
X-T3 weighs 539 g and X100V weighs 478 g, so the X100V is 61 g lighter.
Do the X-T3 and X100V record 4K video?
X-T3: 4K up to 60p. X100V: 4K up to 30p.
Are the X-T3 and X100V weather sealed?
X-T3: Yes. X100V: Yes.
Which has better battery life?
Rated battery life is 390 shots (CIPA) for the X-T3 and 350 shots for the X100V, giving the X-T3 the edge.
How much does each cost?
X-T3 launched at $1,499 and X100V at $1,399. The X100V is $100 less.
Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed May 2026.