Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg

Fujifilm

X100S

Second-generation X100 with 16MP X-Trans sensor and fixed 35mm-equivalent lens.

$1,299

Launch price

Released Jan 2013

vs
GR IV

Ricoh

GR IV

Latest GR with 25.74MP APS-C sensor, 28mm equivalent lens, 5-axis SR, 53GB internal memory, and pocket street-camera handling.

$1,499

Launch price

Released Jan 2026

GR IV is 13 years newer.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Wins

4categories

X100S

Wins

4categories

GR IV

PortraitVlogging

2 categories tied

Which would you choose?

TL;DR — Key differences

X100S wins 1 categories·GR IV wins 4 categories
  • BGR IV has higher ISO max (native) (204,800 vs 6,400)
  • AX100S has higher AF points / zones (425 vs 49)
  • BGR IV has lower ISO min (native) (100 vs 200)
  • BGR IV has lower Weight (262 g vs 445 g)
  • BGR IV has higher Resolution (25.74 MP vs 16.3 MP)

Key specs at a glance

X100SGR IV
Resolution16.3 MP25.74 MP
SensorAPS-CAPS-C
ISO max6,400204,800
Burst6 fps4 fps
IBISNoYes
Weight445 g262 g
Battery330 shots250 shots
4K60 fps

Size and weight, to scale

X100S

127 × 74 × 54 mm

445 g (0.98 lb / 15.70 oz)

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

for scale

GR IV front view

GR IV

109 × 61 × 33 mm

262 g (0.58 lb / 9.24 oz)

X100S is 17mm wider, 13mm taller, and 21mm thicker than GR IV.

X100S is 183 g heavier than GR IV.

Depth (front-to-back): 54mm X100S · 33mm GR IV

Back view, to scale

Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.

X100S

127 × 74 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

GR IV back view

GR IV

109 × 61 mm

Top view, to scale

Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.

X100S

127 × 54 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

GR IV top view

GR IV

109 × 33 mm

Sensor size, to scale

X100S

23.6 × 15.6 mm · APS-C

368 mm² area

GR IV

23.3 × 15.5 mm · APS-C

361 mm² area

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseX100SGR IV
Portrait
4.5Fair
6.5Good✓ wins
Sports & Action
2.5Limited✓ wins
1.5Limited
Video & Hybrid
1.0Limited
3.5Limited✓ wins
Landscape
0.0Limited
2.5Limited✓ wins
Travel
4.0Fair
5.5Fair✓ wins
Wildlife
0.0Limited
1.0Limited✓ wins
Vlogging
3.0Limited
6.5Good✓ wins

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

X100S

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Human

  • Codecs

    Adds H.264

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 126.5, 74.4, 53.9

  • Card types

    Adds SD UHS-I

  • AF points / zones

    425 vs 49 — higher is better

  • Burst (mechanical)

    6 fps vs 4 fps — higher is better

  • Burst (electronic)

    6 fps vs 4 fps — higher is better

  • Battery life (CIPA)

    330 shots vs 250 shots — higher is better

Reasons to choose

GR IV

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Face, Eye

  • Codecs

    Adds MPEG-4 AVC/H.264, MOV

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 109.4, 61.1, 32.7

  • Card types

    Adds microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC UHS-I

  • ISO max (native)

    204,800 vs 6,400 — higher is better

  • ISO min (native)

    100 vs 200 — lower is better

  • In-body stabilization (IBIS)

    Only GR IV supports it

  • Wi-Fi

    Only GR IV supports it

Both cameras share

  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • 1080p max frame rateBoth 60 fps
  • Card slotsBoth 1
  • TouchscreenBoth support touchscreen

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

X100S

Pros

  • Classic fixed-lens design
  • X-Trans sensor
  • Hybrid viewfinder

Cons

  • Very old AF
  • No 4K
  • Fixed screen

GR IV

Pros

  • 25.74MP APS-C sensor
  • 5-axis sensor-shift SR
  • 53GB internal memory
  • Pocketable 28mm GR lens

Cons

  • Fixed lens
  • No built-in EVF
  • Full HD video only

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the X100S and GR IV at major authorized retailers.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Full specifications

= category winner

X100S
GR IV
Resolution
16.3 MP
25.74 MP+58%
Sensor type
APS-C X-Trans CMOS
APS-C CMOS
Sensor size
23.6 x 15.6 mm
23.3 x 15.5 mm
AA filter
No
No
X100S
GR IV
Aperture
f/2.0
F2.8-F16
Focal length (35mm equiv.)
35 mm
28 mm
X100S
GR IV
Processor
EXR Processor II
GR ENGINE 7
X100S
GR IV
ISO min (native)
200
100−100 less
ISO max (native)
6,400
204,800+5 stops
ISO max (expanded)
51,200
204,800
X100S
GR IV
Shutter type
Leaf Shutter + Electronic
Leaf shutter
Max mechanical speed
1/4000 sec
1/4000 sec
Max electronic speed
1/32000 sec

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for vlogging, X100S or GR IV?

GR IV scores 6.5/10 versus 3.0/10 for X100S — 262g — easy to handhold for selfie video.

What's the resolution difference between the X100S and GR IV?

X100S is 16.3 MP and GR IV is 25.74 MP, so the GR IV captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the X100S and GR IV have in-body image stabilization?

X100S does not have IBIS, while GR IV has in-body image stabilization.

Which shoots faster bursts — the X100S or the GR IV?

X100S reaches 6 fps electronic. GR IV reaches 4 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the X100S and GR IV?

X100S weighs 445 g and GR IV weighs 262 g, so the GR IV is 183 g lighter.

Do the X100S and GR IV record 4K video?

X100S: Full HD. GR IV: 4K up to 60p.

Are the X100S and GR IV weather sealed?

X100S: No. GR IV: No.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 330 shots (CIPA) for the X100S and 250 shots for the GR IV, giving the X100S the edge.

How much does each cost?

X100S launched at $1,299 and GR IV at $1,499. The X100S is $200 less.

Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.

Add any camera to get a three-way X100S vs GR IV vs X comparison.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed July 2026.

Product images courtesy of Fujifilm and Ricoh press materials.