Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg
GR IV

Ricoh

GR IV

Latest GR with 25.74MP APS-C sensor, 28mm equivalent lens, 5-axis SR, 53GB internal memory, and pocket street-camera handling.

$1,499

Launch price

Released Jan 2026

vs
Alpha 7R VI

Sony

Alpha 7R VI

66.8MP stacked full-frame high-resolution body with 30fps bursts, 8K 30p, 4K 120p, and Sony's AI processing unit.

$4,499

Launch price

Released Jun 2026

Alpha 7R VI is 5 months newer.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Wins

2categories

GR IV

PortraitVlogging

Wins

6categories

Alpha 7R VI

PortraitVideo & Hybrid

1 categories tied

Which would you choose?

TL;DR — Key differences

GR IV wins 2 categories·Alpha 7R VI wins 3 categories
  • BAlpha 7R VI has higher AF points / zones (759 vs 49)
  • BAlpha 7R VI has higher Burst (electronic) (30 fps vs 4 fps)
  • AGR IV has higher ISO max (native) (204,800 vs 32,000)
  • AGR IV has lower Weight (262 g vs 713 g)
  • BAlpha 7R VI has higher Resolution (66.8 MP vs 25.74 MP)

Key specs at a glance

GR IVAlpha 7R VI
Resolution25.74 MP66.8 MP
SensorAPS-CFull Frame
ISO max204,80032,000
Burst4 fps30 fps
4K60 fps120 fps
IBISYesYes
Weight262 g713 g
Battery250 shots600 shots

Size and weight, to scale

GR IV front view

GR IV

109 × 61 × 33 mm

262 g (0.58 lb / 9.24 oz)

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

for scale

Alpha 7R VI front view

Alpha 7R VI

133 × 97 × 83 mm

713 g (1.57 lb / 25.15 oz)

GR IV is 23mm narrower, 36mm shorter, and 50mm thinner than Alpha 7R VI.

GR IV is 451 g lighter than Alpha 7R VI.

Depth (front-to-back): 33mm GR IV · 83mm Alpha 7R VI

Back view, to scale

Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.

GR IV back view

GR IV

109 × 61 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

Alpha 7R VI back view

Alpha 7R VI

133 × 97 mm

Top view, to scale

Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.

GR IV top view

GR IV

109 × 33 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

Alpha 7R VI top view

Alpha 7R VI

133 × 83 mm

Sensor size, to scale

GR IV

23.3 × 15.5 mm · APS-C

361 mm² area

Alpha 7R VI

35.9 × 24 mm · Full Frame

862 mm² area

2.4× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

GR IV: mount data unavailable

Alpha 7R VI

✓ more lenses

Sony E

350+

native lenses available

80 first-party270 third-party

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseGR IVAlpha 7R VI
Portrait
6.5Good
8.5Excellent✓ wins
Sports & Action
1.5Limited
7.0Good✓ wins
Video & Hybrid
3.5Limited
8.0Excellent✓ wins
Landscape
2.5Limited
7.5Good✓ wins
Travel
5.5Fair✓ wins
5.0Fair
Wildlife
1.0Limited
6.5Good✓ wins
Vlogging
6.5Good✓ wins
5.5Fair

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

GR IV

  • Codecs

    Adds MPEG-4 AVC/H.264, MOV

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 109.4, 61.1, 32.7

  • Card types

    Adds microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC UHS-I

  • ISO max (native)

    204,800 vs 32,000 — higher is better

  • Weight

    262 g vs 713 g — lower is better

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Face

Reasons to choose

Alpha 7R VI

  • Codecs

    Adds XAVC HS, XAVC S, XAVC S-I…

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 132.7, 96.9, 82.9

  • Card types

    Adds CFexpress Type A, SDXC UHS-II

  • AF points / zones

    759 vs 49 — higher is better

  • Burst (electronic)

    30 fps vs 4 fps — higher is better

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Human, Animal, Bird…

  • Resolution

    66.8 MP vs 25.74 MP — higher is better

  • Battery life (CIPA)

    600 shots vs 250 shots — higher is better

Both cameras share

  • ISO min (native)Both 100
  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • In-body stabilization (IBIS)Both support in-body stabilization (ibis)
  • TouchscreenBoth support touchscreen
  • Wi-FiBoth support wi-fi
  • BluetoothBoth support bluetooth

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

GR IV

Pros

  • 25.74MP APS-C sensor
  • 5-axis sensor-shift SR
  • 53GB internal memory
  • Pocketable 28mm GR lens

Cons

  • Fixed lens
  • No built-in EVF
  • Full HD video only

Alpha 7R VI

Pros

  • 66.8MP stacked full-frame sensor
  • 30fps blackout-free electronic burst
  • 8K 30p and 4K 120p video
  • 5-axis sensor-shift stabilization
  • 9.44M-dot HDR OLED EVF

Cons

  • Very expensive
  • Large files demand fast cards and storage
  • 8K workflow can be heavy

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the GR IV and Alpha 7R VI at major authorized retailers.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Full specifications

= category winner

GR IV
Alpha 7R VI
Resolution
25.74 MP
66.8 MP2.6× more
Sensor type
APS-C CMOS
Full-Frame Stacked CMOS
Sensor size
23.3 x 15.5 mm
35.9 × 24.0 mm
AA filter
No
No
GR IV
Alpha 7R VI
Aperture
F2.8-F16
Focal length (35mm equiv.)
28 mm
GR IV
Alpha 7R VI
Processor
GR ENGINE 7
BIONZ XR with AI processing unit
GR IV
Alpha 7R VI
ISO min (native)
100
100
ISO max (native)
204,800+2.7 stops
32,000
ISO max (expanded)
204,800
102,400
GR IV
Alpha 7R VI
Shutter type
Leaf shutter
Mechanical focal plane shutter + electronic rolling shutter
Max mechanical speed
1/4000 sec
1/8000 sec

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for sports, GR IV or Alpha 7R VI?

Alpha 7R VI scores 7.0/10 versus 1.5/10 for GR IV — 30fps burst — pro-level action capture.

What's the resolution difference between the GR IV and Alpha 7R VI?

GR IV is 25.74 MP and Alpha 7R VI is 66.8 MP, so the Alpha 7R VI captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the GR IV and Alpha 7R VI have in-body image stabilization?

GR IV has in-body image stabilization, while Alpha 7R VI has in-body image stabilization.

Which shoots faster bursts — the GR IV or the Alpha 7R VI?

GR IV reaches 4 fps electronic. Alpha 7R VI reaches 30 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the GR IV and Alpha 7R VI?

GR IV weighs 262 g and Alpha 7R VI weighs 713 g, so the GR IV is 451 g lighter.

Do the GR IV and Alpha 7R VI record 4K video?

GR IV: 4K up to 60p. Alpha 7R VI: 8K (max), 4K up to 120p.

Are the GR IV and Alpha 7R VI weather sealed?

GR IV: No. Alpha 7R VI: No.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 250 shots (CIPA) for the GR IV and 600 shots for the Alpha 7R VI, giving the Alpha 7R VI the edge.

How much does each cost?

GR IV launched at $1,499 and Alpha 7R VI at $4,499. The GR IV is $3,000 less.

Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.

Add any camera to get a three-way GR IV vs Alpha 7R VI vs X comparison.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed July 2026.

Product images courtesy of Ricoh and Sony press materials.