Fujifilm
X100VI
Fixed-lens premium compact with 40MP X-Trans and classic street photography design.
$1,599
Released Feb 2024
Ricoh
WG-80
Rugged waterproof compact with 16MP sensor, 5x zoom, ring light, and microscope-friendly macro shooting.
$329
Released Jun 2022
X100VI is 1.7 years newer.
Wins
X100VI
Wins
WG-80
2 categories tied
TL;DR — Key differences
- AX100VI has higher AF points / zones (425 vs 9)
- BWG-80 has lower Weight (194 g vs 521 g)
- AX100VI has higher Resolution (40.2 MP vs 16 MP)
- AX100VI has higher ISO max (native) (12,800 vs 6,400)
- AX100VI has higher Max video bit rate (200 Mbps vs 150 Mbps)
Key specs at a glance
Size and weight, to scale
X100VI
128 × 75 × 55 mm
521 g (1.15 lb / 18.38 oz)
WG-80
123 × 62 × 30 mm
194 g (0.43 lb / 6.84 oz)
X100VI is 6mm wider, 13mm taller, and 26mm thicker than WG-80.
X100VI is 327 g heavier than WG-80.
Depth (front-to-back): 55mm X100VI · 30mm WG-80
Back view, to scale
Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.
X100VI
128 × 75 mm
WG-80
123 × 62 mm
Top view, to scale
Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.
X100VI
128 × 55 mm
WG-80
123 × 30 mm
Sensor size, to scale
X100VI
23.5 × 15.7 mm · APS-C
369 mm² area
Use-case scoring
Which one for what?
Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class
Why pick one over the other
Reasons to choose
X100VI
Subject recognition
Adds Animal, Bird, Automobile…
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
Adds 128, 74.8, 55.3
Card types
Adds SD UHS-I
AF points / zones
425 vs 9 — higher is better
Resolution
40.2 MP vs 16 MP — higher is better
ISO max (native)
12,800 vs 6,400 — higher is better
Eye AF
Only X100VI supports it
Animal / bird AF
Only X100VI supports it
Reasons to choose
WG-80
Subject recognition
Adds Face, Pet
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
Adds 122.5, 61.5, 29.5
Card types
Adds SD, SDHC, SDXC
Weight
194 g vs 521 g — lower is better
Both cameras share
- ✓ISO min (native) — Both 125
- ✓Weather sealing — Both support weather sealing
- ✓Card slots — Both 1
Pros & cons at a glance
Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.
X100VI
Pros
- ✓Unique fixed 23mm lens
- ✓40MP sensor
- ✓Film simulations
- ✓Compact street camera
Cons
- –Fixed lens only
- –No interchangeable lenses
- –Premium price
WG-80
Pros
- ✓Waterproof and shockproof
- ✓5x optical zoom
- ✓Ring light macro
- ✓Affordable rugged compact
Cons
- –Small sensor
- –Full HD only
- –Basic LCD
Full specifications
✓ = category winner
Frequently asked
Quick answers generated from verified specs.
Which is better for wildlife, X100VI or WG-80?
X100VI scores 10.0/10 versus 1.5/10 for WG-80 — 20fps burst captures fleeting moments.
What's the resolution difference between the X100VI and WG-80?
X100VI is 40.2 MP and WG-80 is 16 MP, so the X100VI captures more detail for cropping and large prints.
Do the X100VI and WG-80 have in-body image stabilization?
X100VI has 6-stop in-body image stabilization, while wG-80 does not have IBIS.
What's the weight difference between the X100VI and WG-80?
X100VI weighs 521 g and WG-80 weighs 194 g, so the WG-80 is 327 g lighter.
Do the X100VI and WG-80 record 4K video?
X100VI: 4K up to 60p. WG-80: Full HD.
Are the X100VI and WG-80 weather sealed?
X100VI: Yes. WG-80: Yes.
Which has better battery life?
Rated battery life is 310 shots (CIPA) for the X100VI and 300 shots for the WG-80, giving the X100VI the edge.
How much does each cost?
X100VI launched at $1,599 and WG-80 at $329. The WG-80 is $1,270 less.
Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed May 2026.
Product images courtesy of Fujifilm and Ricoh press materials.