Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg Compare
EOS R6 Mark II

Canon

EOS R6 Mark II

Versatile 24.2MP full-frame hybrid with class-leading AF and 4K 60p video.

$2,499

Released Nov 2022

vs

Ricoh

WG-80

Rugged waterproof compact with 16MP sensor, 5x zoom, ring light, and microscope-friendly macro shooting.

$329

Released Jun 2022

EOS R6 Mark II is 5 months newer.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Wins

7categories

EOS R6 Mark II

PortraitSports & Action

Wins

1categories

WG-80

TL;DR — Key differences

EOS R6 Mark II wins 4 categories·WG-80 wins 1 categories
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher AF points / zones (1053 vs 9)
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher ISO max (native) (102,400 vs 6,400)
  • BWG-80 has lower Weight (194 g vs 680 g)
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher Battery life (CIPA) (760 shots vs 300 shots)
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher Max video bit rate (340 Mbps vs 150 Mbps)

Key specs at a glance

EOS R6 Mark IIWG-80
Resolution24.2 MP16 MP
SensorFull Frame1/2.3 inch
ISO max102,4006,400
Burst40 fps
4K60 fps
IBIS8-stopNo
Weight680 g194 g
Battery760 shots300 shots

Size and weight, to scale

EOS R6 Mark II front view

EOS R6 Mark II

138 × 98 × 88 mm

680 g (1.50 lb / 23.99 oz)

WG-80

123 × 62 × 30 mm

194 g (0.43 lb / 6.84 oz)

EOS R6 Mark II is 16mm wider, 37mm taller, and 59mm thicker than WG-80.

EOS R6 Mark II is 486 g heavier than WG-80.

Depth (front-to-back): 88mm EOS R6 Mark II · 30mm WG-80

Back view, to scale

Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.

EOS R6 Mark II back view

EOS R6 Mark II

138 × 98 mm

WG-80

123 × 62 mm

Top view, to scale

Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.

EOS R6 Mark II top view

EOS R6 Mark II

138 × 88 mm

WG-80

123 × 30 mm

Sensor size, to scale

EOS R6 Mark II

35.9 × 23.9 mm · Full Frame

858 mm² area

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

EOS R6 Mark II

✓ more lenses

Canon RF

105+

native lenses available

45 first-party60 third-party

WG-80: mount data unavailable

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseEOS R6 Mark IIWG-80
Portrait
8.5Excellent✓ wins
1.0Limited
Sports & Action
8.5Excellent✓ wins
1.5Limited
Video & Hybrid
7.5Good✓ wins
1.0Limited
Landscape
7.0Good✓ wins
1.5Limited
Travel
7.5Good✓ wins
5.5Fair
Wildlife
6.5Good✓ wins
1.5Limited
Vlogging
8.0Excellent✓ wins
2.0Limited

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

EOS R6 Mark II

  • Subject recognition

    Adds People, Dogs, Cats…

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 138.4, 98.4, 88.4

  • Card types

    Adds SD UHS-II, SD UHS-II

  • AF points / zones

    1053 vs 9 — higher is better

  • ISO max (native)

    102,400 vs 6,400 — higher is better

  • Battery life (CIPA)

    760 shots vs 300 shots — higher is better

  • Max video bit rate

    340 Mbps vs 150 Mbps — higher is better

  • AA filter

    Only EOS R6 Mark II supports it

Reasons to choose

WG-80

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Face, Pet

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 122.5, 61.5, 29.5

  • Card types

    Adds SD, SDHC, SDXC

  • Weight

    194 g vs 680 g — lower is better

Both cameras share

  • Weather sealingBoth support weather sealing

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

EOS R6 Mark II

Pros

  • Up to 40fps electronic burst
  • 4K 60p oversampled from 6K
  • Dual Pixel CMOS AF II — superb subject tracking
  • 8-stop IBIS
  • Fully articulating touchscreen

Cons

  • 24.2MP may feel limiting for large prints
  • No CFexpress on base body
  • Short battery life vs. A7 IV

WG-80

Pros

  • Waterproof and shockproof
  • 5x optical zoom
  • Ring light macro
  • Affordable rugged compact

Cons

  • Small sensor
  • Full HD only
  • Basic LCD

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the EOS R6 Mark II and WG-80 at major authorized retailers.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Full specifications

= category winner

EOS R6 Mark II
WG-80
Resolution
24.2 MP+51%
16 MP
Sensor type
Full Frame CMOS
1/2.3" CMOS
Sensor size
35.9 × 23.9 mm
1/2.3 inch
AA filter
Yes
EOS R6 Mark II
WG-80
AF system
Dual Pixel CMOS AF II
9-point AF / spot AF / auto tracking AF
AF points / zones
1053117× more
9
AF frame coverage
100 %
AF low-light limit
-6.5 EV
Eye AF
Yes
No
Animal / bird AF
Yes
No
Subject recognition
People, Dogs, Cats, Birds, Horses, Cars, Motorbikes, Aircraft, Trains
Face, Pet
EOS R6 Mark II
WG-80
Burst (mechanical)
12 fps
Burst (electronic)
40 fps
Pre-Capture / Pre-Release
Yes
No
RAW buffer depth
180 frames
EOS R6 Mark II
WG-80
Max resolution
4K UHD
Full HD
4K max frame rate
60 fps
Max video bit rate
340 Mbps2.3× more
150 Mbps
Internal RAW video
Yes
No
Log profile
Canon Log 3 / HDR PQ
Standard profiles
Codecs
H.265, H.264
H.264
EOS R6 Mark II
WG-80
Weight
680 g
194 g−486 g less
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
138.4 × 98.4 × 88.4 mm
122.5 × 61.5 × 29.5 mm
Weather sealing
Yes
Yes

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for portraits, EOS R6 Mark II or WG-80?

EOS R6 Mark II scores 8.5/10 versus 1.0/10 for WG-80 — 24.2MP — solid resolution.

What's the resolution difference between the EOS R6 Mark II and WG-80?

EOS R6 Mark II is 24.2 MP and WG-80 is 16 MP, so the EOS R6 Mark II captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the EOS R6 Mark II and WG-80 have in-body image stabilization?

EOS R6 Mark II has 8-stop in-body image stabilization, while wG-80 does not have IBIS.

What's the weight difference between the EOS R6 Mark II and WG-80?

EOS R6 Mark II weighs 680 g and WG-80 weighs 194 g, so the WG-80 is 486 g lighter.

Do the EOS R6 Mark II and WG-80 record 4K video?

EOS R6 Mark II: 4K up to 60p. WG-80: Full HD.

Are the EOS R6 Mark II and WG-80 weather sealed?

EOS R6 Mark II: Yes. WG-80: Yes.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 760 shots (CIPA) for the EOS R6 Mark II and 300 shots for the WG-80, giving the EOS R6 Mark II the edge.

How much does each cost?

EOS R6 Mark II launched at $2,499 and WG-80 at $329. The WG-80 is $2,170 less.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed May 2026.

Product images courtesy of Canon and Ricoh press materials.