Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg Compare

Hasselblad

X2D 100C

100MP medium format with 5-axis IBIS and Hasselblad color.

$8,199

Released Jun 2022

vs

Ricoh

GR IV

Latest GR with 25.74MP APS-C sensor, 28mm equivalent lens, 5-axis SR, 53GB internal memory, and pocket street-camera handling.

$1,499

Released Jan 2026

GR IV is 3.5 years newer.

Wins

7categories

X2D 100C

WildlifeLandscape

Wins

2categories

GR IV

PortraitVlogging

1 categories tied

TL;DR — Key differences

X2D 100C wins 3 categories·GR IV wins 2 categories
  • AX2D 100C has higher Burst (electronic) (30 fps vs 4 fps)
  • BGR IV has higher ISO max (native) (204,800 vs 51,200)
  • AX2D 100C has higher Resolution (100 MP vs 25.74 MP)
  • AX2D 100C has higher Burst (mechanical) (12 fps vs 4 fps)
  • BGR IV has lower Weight (262 g vs 720 g)

Key specs at a glance

X2D 100CGR IV
Resolution100 MP25.74 MP
Sensor43.8 × 32.9 mmAPS-C
ISO max51,200204,800
Burst30 fps4 fps
4K60 fps60 fps
IBIS8-stopYes
Weight720 g262 g
Battery520 shots250 shots

Size and weight, to scale

X2D 100C

138 × 98 × 88 mm

720 g (1.59 lb / 25.40 oz)

GR IV

109 × 61 × 33 mm

262 g (0.58 lb / 9.24 oz)

X2D 100C is 29mm wider, 37mm taller, and 55mm thicker than GR IV.

X2D 100C is 458 g heavier than GR IV.

Depth (front-to-back): 88mm X2D 100C · 33mm GR IV

Sensor size, to scale

X2D 100C

43.8 × 32.9 mm · Medium Format

1441 mm² area

GR IV

23.3 × 15.5 mm · APS-C

361 mm² area

4.0× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseX2D 100CGR IV
Portrait
6.0Good
6.5Good✓ wins
Sports & Action
7.5Good✓ wins
0.5Limited
Video & Hybrid
6.0Good✓ wins
3.5Limited
Landscape
8.0Excellent✓ wins
2.5Limited
Travel
6.0Good✓ wins
5.5Fair
Wildlife
10.0Excellent✓ wins
1.0Limited
Vlogging
5.5Fair
6.5Good✓ wins

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

X2D 100C

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Human, Animal, Bird…

  • Codecs

    Adds H.265, H.264

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 138, 98, 88

  • Card types

    Adds CFexpress Type B, SD UHS-II

  • Burst (electronic)

    30 fps vs 4 fps — higher is better

  • Resolution

    100 MP vs 25.74 MP — higher is better

  • Burst (mechanical)

    12 fps vs 4 fps — higher is better

  • AF points / zones

    117 vs 49 — higher is better

Reasons to choose

GR IV

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Face, Eye

  • Codecs

    Adds MPEG-4 AVC/H.264, MOV

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 109.4, 61.1, 32.7

  • Card types

    Adds microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC UHS-I

  • ISO max (native)

    204,800 vs 51,200 — higher is better

  • Weight

    262 g vs 720 g — lower is better

Both cameras share

  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • 4K max frame rateBoth 60 fps
  • In-body stabilizationBoth support in-body stabilization
  • TouchscreenBoth support touchscreen
  • Wi-FiBoth support wi-fi
  • BluetoothBoth support bluetooth

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

X2D 100C

Pros

  • 100MP medium format
  • IBIS
  • Stunning files

Cons

  • Very expensive
  • Slow operation
  • Limited lens line

GR IV

Pros

  • 25.74MP APS-C sensor
  • 5-axis sensor-shift SR
  • 53GB internal memory
  • Pocketable 28mm GR lens

Cons

  • Fixed lens
  • No built-in EVF
  • Full HD video only

Full specifications

= category winner

X2D 100C
GR IV
Resolution
100 MP3.9× more
25.74 MP
Sensor type
Medium Format CMOS
APS-C CMOS
Sensor size
43.8 × 32.9 mm
23.3 x 15.5 mm
AA filter
Yes
No
X2D 100C
GR IV
AF system
Contrast-detect AF
Hybrid AF (image-plane phase detection + contrast detection)
AF points / zones
1172.4× more
49
AF frame coverage
100 %
AF low-light limit
-2 EV
Eye AF
Yes
Yes
Animal / bird AF
Yes
No
Subject recognition
Human, Animal, Bird, Vehicle
Face, Eye
X2D 100C
GR IV
Burst (mechanical)
12 fps3× more
4 fps
Burst (electronic)
30 fps7.5× more
4 fps
Pre-Capture / Pre-Release
Yes
No
RAW buffer depth
200 frames
X2D 100C
GR IV
Max resolution
4K UHD
Full HD
4K max frame rate
60 fps
60 fps
Max video bit rate
150 Mbps
Internal RAW video
No
No
Log profile
Standard profiles
Standard profiles
Codecs
H.265, H.264
MPEG-4 AVC/H.264, MOV
X2D 100C
GR IV
Weight
720 g
262 g−458 g less
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
138 × 98 × 88 mm
109.4 × 61.1 × 32.7 mm
Weather sealing
Yes
No

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for wildlife, X2D 100C or GR IV?

X2D 100C scores 10.0/10 versus 1.0/10 for GR IV — 30fps burst captures fleeting moments.

What's the resolution difference between the X2D 100C and GR IV?

X2D 100C is 100 MP and GR IV is 25.74 MP, so the X2D 100C captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the X2D 100C and GR IV have in-body image stabilization?

X2D 100C has 8-stop in-body image stabilization, while gR IV has in-body image stabilization.

Which shoots faster bursts — the X2D 100C or the GR IV?

X2D 100C reaches 30 fps electronic. GR IV reaches 4 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the X2D 100C and GR IV?

X2D 100C weighs 720 g and GR IV weighs 262 g, so the GR IV is 458 g lighter.

Do the X2D 100C and GR IV record 4K video?

X2D 100C: 4K up to 60p. GR IV: 4K up to 60p.

Are the X2D 100C and GR IV weather sealed?

X2D 100C: Yes. GR IV: No.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 520 shots (CIPA) for the X2D 100C and 250 shots for the GR IV, giving the X2D 100C the edge.

How much does each cost?

X2D 100C launched at $8,199 and GR IV at $1,499. The GR IV is $6,700 less.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed May 2026.