Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg
X2D II 100C

Hasselblad

X2D II 100C

Second-gen 100MP medium format flagship with faster AF, improved IBIS, and Hasselblad Natural Colour.

$8,499

Launch price

Released Sep 2025

vs

Xtra

Atto

Ultra-compact 54g wearable action camera with 1/1.3-inch sensor, 4K/60fps, 143° FOV, 128GB internal storage, and 220-min battery with Vision Dock.

$299

Launch price

Released Jan 2026

Atto is 5 months newer.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Wins

5categories

X2D II 100C

Sports & ActionLandscape

Wins

2categories

Atto

Travel

1 categories tied

Which would you choose?

TL;DR — Key differences

X2D II 100C wins 4 categories·Atto wins 1 categories
  • AX2D II 100C has higher AF points / zones (425 vs 0)
  • AX2D II 100C has higher Card slots (1 vs 0)
  • BAtto has lower Weight (54 g vs 840 g)
  • AX2D II 100C has higher ISO max (native) (25,600 vs 6,400)
  • AX2D II 100C has lower ISO min (native) (50 vs 100)

Key specs at a glance

X2D II 100CAtto
Resolution100 MP
Sensor43.8 x 32.9 mm9.6 × 7.2 mm
ISO max25,6006,400
Burst30 fps
4K60 fps60 fps
IBIS7-stopNo
Weight840 g54 g
Battery466 shots640 shots

Size and weight, to scale

X2D II 100C front view

X2D II 100C

149 × 106 × 75 mm

840 g (1.85 lb / 29.63 oz)

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

for scale

X2D II 100C is 786 g heavier than Atto.

Depth (front-to-back): 75mm X2D II 100C

Back view, to scale

Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.

X2D II 100C back view

X2D II 100C

149 × 106 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

Top view, to scale

Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.

X2D II 100C top view

X2D II 100C

149 × 75 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

Sensor size, to scale

X2D II 100C

43.8 × 32.9 mm · Full Frame

1441 mm² area

Atto

9.6 × 7.2 mm · Compact

69 mm² area

20.9× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseX2D II 100CAtto
Portrait
6.0Good✓ wins
1.0Limited
Sports & Action
8.5Excellent✓ wins
5.0Fair
Video & Hybrid
6.0Good✓ wins
4.0Fair
Landscape
7.0Good✓ wins
1.5Limited
Travel
5.0Fair
8.0Excellent✓ wins
Wildlife
5.5Fair✓ wins
3.0Limited
Vlogging
5.5Fair✓ wins
4.0Fair

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

X2D II 100C

  • AF points / zones

    425 vs 0 — higher is better

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Animals, People, Vehicles

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 148.5, 106, 75

  • Card slots

    1 vs 0 — higher is better

  • Card types

    Adds CFexpress Type B

  • ISO max (native)

    25,600 vs 6,400 — higher is better

  • ISO min (native)

    50 vs 100 — lower is better

  • Eye AF

    Only X2D II 100C supports it

Reasons to choose

Atto

  • Stabilization modes

    Adds MotionMaster, TiltGuard

  • Card types

    Adds microSD (via Vision Dock)

  • Weight

    54 g vs 840 g — lower is better

  • Battery life (CIPA)

    640 shots vs 466 shots — higher is better

Both cameras share

  • Pre-Capture / Pre-ReleaseBoth support pre-capture / pre-release
  • 4K max frame rateBoth 60 fps
  • Weather sealingBoth support weather sealing
  • Wi-FiBoth support wi-fi
  • BluetoothBoth support bluetooth

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

X2D II 100C

Pros

  • 100MP medium format
  • 7-stop IBIS
  • Faster AF than X2D
  • Stunning color science

Cons

  • Very expensive
  • Large files
  • Not for action

Atto

Pros

  • 54g lightest in class
  • 220 min with Vision Dock
  • 128GB built-in + 600MB/s transfer
  • 5-min pre-recording

Cons

  • No built-in screen
  • 4K/60fps 16:9 only
  • 10m waterproof (no case)

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the X2D II 100C and Atto at major authorized retailers.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Full specifications

= category winner

X2D II 100C
Atto
Resolution
100 MP
Sensor type
BSI CMOS
1/1.3" CMOS
Sensor size
43.8 x 32.9 mm
9.6 × 7.2 mm
AA filter
No
X2D II 100C
Atto
Field of view
143 °
X2D II 100C
Atto
Processor
Image processor
Xtra AI processor
X2D II 100C
Atto
ISO min (native)
50−50 less
100
ISO max (native)
25,600+2 stops
6,400
ISO max (expanded)
102,400
6,400
X2D II 100C
Atto
Shutter type
Leaf Shutter and Electronic Rolling Shutter
Electronic shutter
Max mechanical speed
1/4000
1/8000 sec
Max electronic speed
1/6000
1/8000 sec

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for landscape, X2D II 100C or Atto?

X2D II 100C scores 7.0/10 versus 1.5/10 for Atto — 100MP — massive detail for large prints.

Do the X2D II 100C and Atto have in-body image stabilization?

X2D II 100C has 7-stop in-body image stabilization, while Atto uses Electronic stabilization (MotionMaster + TiltGuard) (electronic).

What's the weight difference between the X2D II 100C and Atto?

X2D II 100C weighs 840 g and Atto weighs 54 g, so the Atto is 786 g lighter.

Do the X2D II 100C and Atto record 4K video?

X2D II 100C: 4K up to 60p. Atto: 4K up to 60p.

Are the X2D II 100C and Atto weather sealed?

X2D II 100C: Yes. Atto: Yes.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 466 shots (CIPA) for the X2D II 100C and 640 shots for the Atto, giving the Atto the edge.

How much does each cost?

X2D II 100C launched at $8,499 and Atto at $299. The Atto is $8,200 less.

Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.

Add any camera to get a three-way X2D II 100C vs Atto vs X comparison.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed June 2026.

Product images courtesy of Hasselblad and Xtra press materials.