Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg
EOS R6 Mark II

Canon

EOS R6 Mark II

Versatile 24.2MP full-frame hybrid with class-leading AF and 4K 60p video.

$2,499

Launch price

Released Nov 2022

vs
X2D II 100C

Hasselblad

X2D II 100C

Second-gen 100MP medium format flagship with faster AF, improved IBIS, and Hasselblad Natural Colour.

$8,499

Launch price

Released Sep 2025

X2D II 100C is 2.8 years newer.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Wins

10categories

EOS R6 Mark II

Sports & ActionPortrait

Wins

5categories

X2D II 100C

Sports & ActionLandscape

3 categories tied

Which would you choose?

TL;DR — Key differences

EOS R6 Mark II wins 4 categories·X2D II 100C wins 1 categories
  • BX2D II 100C has higher Resolution (100 MP vs 24.2 MP)
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher ISO max (native) (102,400 vs 25,600)
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher Burst (mechanical) (12 fps vs 3 fps)
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher AF points / zones (1053 vs 425)
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher Max video bit rate (340 Mbps vs 150 Mbps)

Key specs at a glance

EOS R6 Mark IIX2D II 100C
Resolution24.2 MP100 MP
SensorFull Frame43.8 x 32.9 mm
ISO max102,40025,600
Burst40 fps30 fps
4K60 fps60 fps
IBIS8-stop7-stop
Weight670 g840 g
Battery760 shots466 shots

Size and weight, to scale

EOS R6 Mark II front view

EOS R6 Mark II

138 × 98 × 88 mm

670 g (1.48 lb / 23.63 oz)

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

for scale

X2D II 100C front view

X2D II 100C

149 × 106 × 75 mm

840 g (1.85 lb / 29.63 oz)

EOS R6 Mark II is 10mm narrower and 8mm shorter than X2D II 100C but it is also 13mm thicker.

EOS R6 Mark II is 170 g lighter than X2D II 100C.

Depth (front-to-back): 88mm EOS R6 Mark II · 75mm X2D II 100C

Back view, to scale

Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.

EOS R6 Mark II back view

EOS R6 Mark II

138 × 98 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

X2D II 100C back view

X2D II 100C

149 × 106 mm

Top view, to scale

Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.

EOS R6 Mark II top view

EOS R6 Mark II

138 × 88 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

X2D II 100C top view

X2D II 100C

149 × 75 mm

Sensor size, to scale

EOS R6 Mark II

35.9 × 23.9 mm · Full Frame

858 mm² area

X2D II 100C

43.8 × 32.9 mm · Full Frame

1441 mm² area

1.7× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

EOS R6 Mark II

✓ more lenses

Canon RF

105+

native lenses available

45 first-party60 third-party

X2D II 100C: mount data unavailable

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseEOS R6 Mark IIX2D II 100C
Portrait
8.5Excellent✓ wins
6.0Good
Sports & Action
9.0Excellent✓ wins
8.5Excellent
Video & Hybrid
7.5Good✓ wins
6.0Good
Landscape
7.0Good
7.0Good
Travel
7.5Good✓ wins
5.0Fair
Wildlife
6.5Good✓ wins
5.5Fair
Vlogging
8.0Excellent✓ wins
5.5Fair

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

EOS R6 Mark II

  • AF low-light limit

    -6.5 EV vs -2 EV — lower is better

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 138.4, 98.4, 88.4

  • Card types

    Adds SD UHS-II, SD UHS-II

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Dogs, Cats, Birds…

  • ISO max (native)

    102,400 vs 25,600 — higher is better

  • Burst (mechanical)

    12 fps vs 3 fps — higher is better

  • AF points / zones

    1053 vs 425 — higher is better

  • Max video bit rate

    340 Mbps vs 150 Mbps — higher is better

Reasons to choose

X2D II 100C

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 148.5, 106, 75

  • Card types

    Adds CFexpress Type B

  • Resolution

    100 MP vs 24.2 MP — higher is better

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Animals, Vehicles

  • ISO min (native)

    50 vs 100 — lower is better

  • EVF resolution

    5,760,000 vs 3,690,000 — higher is better

  • EVF magnification

    1 × vs 0.76 × — higher is better

  • RAW buffer depth

    200 frames vs 180 frames — higher is better

Both cameras share

  • AF frame coverageBoth 100 %
  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • Animal / bird AFBoth support animal / bird af
  • Pre-Capture / Pre-ReleaseBoth support pre-capture / pre-release
  • 4K max frame rateBoth 60 fps
  • In-body stabilization (IBIS)Both support in-body stabilization (ibis)

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

EOS R6 Mark II

Pros

  • Up to 40fps electronic burst
  • 4K 60p oversampled from 6K
  • Dual Pixel CMOS AF II — superb subject tracking
  • 8-stop IBIS
  • Fully articulating touchscreen

Cons

  • 24.2MP may feel limiting for large prints
  • No CFexpress on base body
  • Short battery life vs. A7 IV

X2D II 100C

Pros

  • 100MP medium format
  • 7-stop IBIS
  • Faster AF than X2D
  • Stunning color science

Cons

  • Very expensive
  • Large files
  • Not for action

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the EOS R6 Mark II and X2D II 100C at major authorized retailers.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Full specifications

= category winner

EOS R6 Mark II
X2D II 100C
Resolution
24.2 MP
100 MP4.1× more
Sensor type
Full Frame CMOS
BSI CMOS
Sensor size
35.9 × 23.9 mm
43.8 x 32.9 mm
AA filter
Yes
No
EOS R6 Mark II
X2D II 100C
Processor
DIGIC X
Image processor
EOS R6 Mark II
X2D II 100C
ISO min (native)
100
50−50 less
ISO max (native)
102,400+2 stops
25,600
ISO max (expanded)
204,800
102,400
EOS R6 Mark II
X2D II 100C
Shutter type
Mechanical + Electronic
Leaf Shutter and Electronic Rolling Shutter
Max mechanical speed
1/8000 sec
1/4000
Max electronic speed
1/16000 sec
1/6000

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for portraits, EOS R6 Mark II or X2D II 100C?

EOS R6 Mark II scores 8.5/10 versus 6.0/10 for X2D II 100C — 24.2MP — solid resolution.

What's the resolution difference between the EOS R6 Mark II and X2D II 100C?

EOS R6 Mark II is 24.2 MP and X2D II 100C is 100 MP, so the X2D II 100C captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the EOS R6 Mark II and X2D II 100C have in-body image stabilization?

EOS R6 Mark II has 8-stop in-body image stabilization, while X2D II 100C has 7-stop in-body image stabilization.

Which shoots faster bursts — the EOS R6 Mark II or the X2D II 100C?

EOS R6 Mark II reaches 40 fps electronic. X2D II 100C reaches 30 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the EOS R6 Mark II and X2D II 100C?

EOS R6 Mark II weighs 670 g and X2D II 100C weighs 840 g, so the EOS R6 Mark II is 170 g lighter.

Do the EOS R6 Mark II and X2D II 100C record 4K video?

EOS R6 Mark II: 4K up to 60p. X2D II 100C: 4K up to 60p.

Are the EOS R6 Mark II and X2D II 100C weather sealed?

EOS R6 Mark II: Yes. X2D II 100C: Yes.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 760 shots (CIPA) for the EOS R6 Mark II and 466 shots for the X2D II 100C, giving the EOS R6 Mark II the edge.

How much does each cost?

EOS R6 Mark II launched at $2,499 and X2D II 100C at $8,499. The EOS R6 Mark II is $6,000 less.

Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.

Add any camera to get a three-way EOS R6 Mark II vs X2D II 100C vs X comparison.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed July 2026.

Product images courtesy of Canon and Hasselblad press materials.