Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg
GO Ultra

Insta360

GO Ultra

Tiny wearable action camera with magnetic mounting, 4K video, and FlowState stabilization.

$299

Launch price

Released Aug 2024

vs

OM System

OM-1 II

Flagship MFT with stacked sensor, 120fps, and pro wildlife features.

$2,399

Launch price

Released Feb 2024

GO Ultra is 7 months newer.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Wins

4categories

GO Ultra

Sports & ActionTravel

Wins

8categories

OM-1 II

Sports & ActionTravel

3 categories tied

Which would you choose?

TL;DR — Key differences

GO Ultra wins 0 categories·OM-1 II wins 5 categories
  • BOM-1 II has lower AF low-light limit (-8 EV vs 0 EV)
  • BOM-1 II has higher AF points / zones (1053 vs 0)
  • BOM-1 II has higher AF frame coverage (100 % vs 0 %)
  • BOM-1 II has higher ISO max (native) (102,400 vs 6,400)
  • BOM-1 II has higher Burst (electronic) (120 fps vs 15 fps)

Key specs at a glance

GO UltraOM-1 II
Resolution50 MP20.4 MP
Sensor1/1.28"MFT
ISO max6,400102,400
Burst15 fps120 fps
4K60 fps60 fps
IBIS6-stop8.5-stop
Weight161.4 g599 g
Battery640 shots520 shots

Size and weight, to scale

GO Ultra front view

GO Ultra

70 × 49 × 33 mm

161.4 g (0.36 lb / 5.69 oz)

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

for scale

OM-1 II

135 × 92 × 73 mm

599 g (1.32 lb / 21.13 oz)

GO Ultra is 64mm narrower, 43mm shorter, and 39mm thinner than OM-1 II.

GO Ultra is 438 g lighter than OM-1 II.

Depth (front-to-back): 33mm GO Ultra · 73mm OM-1 II

Back view, to scale

Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.

GO Ultra back view

GO Ultra

70 × 49 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

OM-1 II

135 × 92 mm

Top view, to scale

Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.

GO Ultra top view

GO Ultra

70 × 33 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

OM-1 II

135 × 73 mm

Sensor size, to scale

OM-1 II

17.4 × 13 mm · Compact / large-type

226 mm² area

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

GO Ultra: mount data unavailable

OM-1 II

✓ more lenses

Micro Four Thirds

130+

native lenses available

60 first-party70 third-party

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseGO UltraOM-1 II
Portrait
6.0Good✓ wins
4.0Fair
Sports & Action
10.0Excellent
10.0Excellent
Video & Hybrid
4.5Fair
5.5Fair✓ wins
Landscape
6.0Good✓ wins
2.5Limited
Travel
8.0Excellent✓ wins
7.0Good
Wildlife
8.0Excellent✓ wins
6.5Good
Vlogging
7.5Good✓ wins
7.0Good

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

GO Ultra

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Human, Animal, Bird…

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 70.4, 48.8, 33.3

  • Card types

    Adds microSD

  • Weight

    161.4 g vs 599 g — lower is better

  • Resolution

    50 MP vs 20.4 MP — higher is better

  • AA filter

    Only GO Ultra supports it

  • Headphone jack (3.5mm)

    Only GO Ultra supports it

  • Battery life (CIPA)

    640 shots vs 520 shots — higher is better

Reasons to choose

OM-1 II

  • AF low-light limit

    -8 EV vs 0 EV — lower is better

  • AF points / zones

    1053 vs 0 — higher is better

  • AF frame coverage

    100 % vs 0 % — higher is better

  • Subject recognition

    Adds People, Birds, Animals…

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 134.8, 91.6, 72.7

  • Card types

    Adds SD UHS-II, SD UHS-I

  • ISO max (native)

    102,400 vs 6,400 — higher is better

  • Burst (electronic)

    120 fps vs 15 fps — higher is better

Both cameras share

  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • Animal / bird AFBoth support animal / bird af
  • Pre-Capture / Pre-ReleaseBoth support pre-capture / pre-release
  • 4K max frame rateBoth 60 fps
  • 1080p max frame rateBoth 240 fps
  • In-body stabilization (IBIS)Both support in-body stabilization (ibis)

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

GO Ultra

Pros

  • Ultra tiny 39g body
  • Magnetic mount system
  • 4K video
  • Wearable POV

Cons

  • Small sensor
  • Short battery life
  • Limited manual control

OM-1 II

Pros

  • 120fps stills
  • Stacked MFT
  • IP53 weather sealing
  • Computational features

Cons

  • MFT sensor size
  • Smaller ecosystem
  • Menu complexity

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the GO Ultra and OM-1 II at major authorized retailers.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Full specifications

= category winner

GO Ultra
OM-1 II
Resolution
50 MP2.5× more
20.4 MP
Sensor type
CMOS
4/3 Stacked BSI Live MOS
Sensor size
1/1.28"
17.4 x 13.0 mm
AA filter
Yes
No
GO Ultra
OM-1 II
Aperture
2.85
Field of view
156 °
GO Ultra
OM-1 II
Processor
Image processor
TruePic X
GO Ultra
OM-1 II
ISO min (native)
100
80−20 less
ISO max (native)
6,400
102,400+4 stops
ISO max (expanded)
102,400
102,400
GO Ultra
OM-1 II
Shutter type
Mechanical + Electronic
Computerised focal-plane shutter + electronic shutter
Max mechanical speed
1/8000 sec
1/8000 sec
Max electronic speed
1/16000 sec
1/32000 sec

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for landscape, GO Ultra or OM-1 II?

GO Ultra scores 6.0/10 versus 2.5/10 for OM-1 II — 50MP — massive detail for large prints.

What's the resolution difference between the GO Ultra and OM-1 II?

GO Ultra is 50 MP and OM-1 II is 20.4 MP, so the GO Ultra captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the GO Ultra and OM-1 II have in-body image stabilization?

GO Ultra has 6-stop in-body image stabilization, while OM-1 II has 8.5-stop in-body image stabilization.

Which shoots faster bursts — the GO Ultra or the OM-1 II?

GO Ultra reaches 15 fps electronic. OM-1 II reaches 120 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the GO Ultra and OM-1 II?

GO Ultra weighs 161.4 g and OM-1 II weighs 599 g, so the GO Ultra is 438 g lighter.

Do the GO Ultra and OM-1 II record 4K video?

GO Ultra: 4K up to 60p. OM-1 II: 4K up to 60p.

Are the GO Ultra and OM-1 II weather sealed?

GO Ultra: Yes. OM-1 II: Yes.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 640 shots (CIPA) for the GO Ultra and 520 shots for the OM-1 II, giving the GO Ultra the edge.

How much does each cost?

GO Ultra launched at $299 and OM-1 II at $2,399. The GO Ultra is $2,100 less.

Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.

Add any camera to get a three-way GO Ultra vs OM-1 II vs X comparison.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed July 2026.

Product images courtesy of Insta360 and OM System press materials.