Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg Compare

Insta360

X3

5.7K 360 camera with dual 1/2-inch 48MP sensors, 72MP photos, 4K single-lens mode, and IPX8 10m waterproofing.

$449

Released Sep 2022

vs

OM System

OM-1 II

Flagship MFT with stacked sensor, 120fps, and pro wildlife features.

$2,399

Released Feb 2024

OM-1 II is 1.4 years newer.

Wins

4categories

X3

Travel

Wins

7categories

OM-1 II

Sports & ActionTravel

1 categories tied

TL;DR — Key differences

X3 wins 2 categories·OM-1 II wins 3 categories
  • BOM-1 II has higher AF points / zones (1053 vs 0)
  • BOM-1 II has higher ISO max (native) (102,400 vs 6,400)
  • BOM-1 II has higher Burst (electronic) (120 fps vs 15 fps)
  • AX3 has higher Resolution (72 MP vs 20.4 MP)
  • AX3 has lower Weight (180 g vs 599 g)

Key specs at a glance

X3OM-1 II
Resolution72 MP20.4 MP
Sensor1/2"MFT
ISO max6,400102,400
Burst15 fps120 fps
4K30 fps60 fps
IBISNo8.5-stop
Weight180 g599 g
Battery640 shots520 shots

Size and weight, to scale

X3

46 × 114 × 33 mm

180 g (0.40 lb / 6.35 oz)

OM-1 II

135 × 92 × 73 mm

599 g (1.32 lb / 21.13 oz)

X3 is 89mm narrower and 40mm thinner than OM-1 II but it is also 22mm taller.

X3 is 419 g lighter than OM-1 II.

Depth (front-to-back): 33mm X3 · 73mm OM-1 II

Sensor size, to scale

OM-1 II

17.4 × 13 mm · Compact / large-type

226 mm² area

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

X3: mount data unavailable

OM-1 II

✓ more lenses

Micro Four Thirds

130+

native lenses available

60 first-party70 third-party

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseX3OM-1 II
Portrait
3.0Limited
4.0Fair✓ wins
Sports & Action
5.0Fair
8.5Excellent✓ wins
Video & Hybrid
4.0Fair
5.5Fair✓ wins
Landscape
5.0Fair✓ wins
2.5Limited
Travel
7.0Good
7.0Good
Wildlife
4.5Fair
6.5Good✓ wins
Vlogging
4.0Fair
7.0Good✓ wins

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

X3

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 46, 114, 33.1

  • Card types

    Adds microSD

  • Resolution

    72 MP vs 20.4 MP — higher is better

  • Weight

    180 g vs 599 g — lower is better

  • Internal RAW video

    Only X3 supports it

  • Headphone jack (3.5mm)

    Only X3 supports it

  • Max video bit rate

    200 Mbps vs 150 Mbps — higher is better

  • Battery life (CIPA)

    640 shots vs 520 shots — higher is better

Reasons to choose

OM-1 II

  • AF points / zones

    1053 vs 0 — higher is better

  • Subject recognition

    Adds People, Birds, Animals…

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 134.8, 91.6, 72.7

  • Card types

    Adds SD UHS-II, SD UHS-I

  • ISO max (native)

    102,400 vs 6,400 — higher is better

  • Burst (electronic)

    120 fps vs 15 fps — higher is better

  • Eye AF

    Only OM-1 II supports it

  • Animal / bird AF

    Only OM-1 II supports it

Both cameras share

  • Pre-Capture / Pre-ReleaseBoth support pre-capture / pre-release
  • Weather sealingBoth support weather sealing
  • Card slotsBoth 1
  • TouchscreenBoth support touchscreen
  • Wi-FiBoth support wi-fi
  • BluetoothBoth support bluetooth

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

X3

Pros

  • 72MP 360 photos
  • 5.7K60 360 video
  • Great value used
  • 10m waterproof

Cons

  • No 8K vs X4
  • Single-lens capped at 4K30
  • Older AI editing

OM-1 II

Pros

  • 120fps stills
  • Stacked MFT
  • IP53 weather sealing
  • Computational features

Cons

  • MFT sensor size
  • Smaller ecosystem
  • Menu complexity

Full specifications

= category winner

X3
OM-1 II
Resolution
72 MP3.5× more
20.4 MP
Sensor type
Dual 1/2" CMOS (360°)
4/3 Stacked BSI Live MOS
Sensor size
1/2"
17.4 x 13.0 mm
AA filter
No
X3
OM-1 II
AF system
Fixed focus
1053-point Cross Quad Pixel phase detection AF
AF points / zones
0
1053
AF frame coverage
100 %
AF low-light limit
-8 EV
Eye AF
No
Yes
Animal / bird AF
No
Yes
Subject recognition
People, Birds, Animals, Motorsports, Airplanes, Trains
X3
OM-1 II
Burst (mechanical)
6 fps
10 fps+67%
Burst (electronic)
15 fps
120 fps8× more
Pre-Capture / Pre-Release
Yes
Yes
RAW buffer depth
60 frames
X3
OM-1 II
Max resolution
5.7K
4K / C4K
4K max frame rate
30 fps
60 fps2× more
Max video bit rate
200 Mbps+33%
150 Mbps
Internal RAW video
Yes
No
Log profile
Log profile supported
OM-Log / HLG
Codecs
H.264, H.265
H.264, H.265, MOV
X3
OM-1 II
Weight
180 g−419 g less
599 g
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
46 × 114 × 33.1 mm
134.8 × 91.6 × 72.7 mm
Weather sealing
Yes
Yes

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for sports, X3 or OM-1 II?

OM-1 II scores 8.5/10 versus 5.0/10 for X3 — 120fps burst — pro-level action capture.

What's the resolution difference between the X3 and OM-1 II?

X3 is 72 MP and OM-1 II is 20.4 MP, so the X3 captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the X3 and OM-1 II have in-body image stabilization?

X3 does not have IBIS, while oM-1 II has 8.5-stop in-body image stabilization.

Which shoots faster bursts — the X3 or the OM-1 II?

X3 reaches 15 fps electronic. OM-1 II reaches 120 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the X3 and OM-1 II?

X3 weighs 180 g and OM-1 II weighs 599 g, so the X3 is 419 g lighter.

Do the X3 and OM-1 II record 4K video?

X3: 4K up to 30p. OM-1 II: 4K up to 60p.

Are the X3 and OM-1 II weather sealed?

X3: Yes. OM-1 II: Yes.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 640 shots (CIPA) for the X3 and 520 shots for the OM-1 II, giving the X3 the edge.

How much does each cost?

X3 launched at $449 and OM-1 II at $2,399. The X3 is $1,950 less.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed May 2026.