Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg
X3

Insta360

X3

5.7K 360 camera with dual 1/2-inch 48MP sensors, 72MP photos, 4K single-lens mode, and IPX8 10m waterproofing.

$449

Launch price

Released Sep 2022

vs

OM System

OM-1 II

Flagship MFT with stacked sensor, 120fps, and pro wildlife features.

$2,399

Launch price

Released Feb 2024

OM-1 II is 1.4 years newer.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Wins

4categories

X3

Travel

Wins

8categories

OM-1 II

Sports & ActionTravel

1 categories tied

Which would you choose?

TL;DR — Key differences

X3 wins 1 categories·OM-1 II wins 4 categories
  • BOM-1 II has higher AF points / zones (1053 vs 0)
  • BOM-1 II has higher ISO max (native) (102,400 vs 6,400)
  • BOM-1 II has higher Burst (electronic) (120 fps vs 15 fps)
  • BOM-1 II has higher 1080p max frame rate (240 fps vs 60 fps)
  • AX3 has higher Resolution (72 MP vs 20.4 MP)

Key specs at a glance

X3OM-1 II
Resolution72 MP20.4 MP
Sensor1/2"MFT
ISO max6,400102,400
Burst15 fps120 fps
4K30 fps60 fps
IBISNo8.5-stop
Weight180 g599 g
Battery640 shots520 shots

Size and weight, to scale

X3 front view

X3

46 × 114 × 33 mm

180 g (0.40 lb / 6.35 oz)

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

for scale

OM-1 II

135 × 92 × 73 mm

599 g (1.32 lb / 21.13 oz)

X3 is 89mm narrower and 40mm thinner than OM-1 II but it is also 22mm taller.

X3 is 419 g lighter than OM-1 II.

Depth (front-to-back): 33mm X3 · 73mm OM-1 II

Back view, to scale

Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.

X3 back view

X3

46 × 114 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

OM-1 II

135 × 92 mm

Top view, to scale

Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.

X3 top view

X3

46 × 33 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

OM-1 II

135 × 73 mm

Sensor size, to scale

OM-1 II

17.4 × 13 mm · Compact / large-type

226 mm² area

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

X3: mount data unavailable

OM-1 II

✓ more lenses

Micro Four Thirds

130+

native lenses available

60 first-party70 third-party

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseX3OM-1 II
Portrait
3.0Limited
4.0Fair✓ wins
Sports & Action
5.0Fair
10.0Excellent✓ wins
Video & Hybrid
4.0Fair
5.5Fair✓ wins
Landscape
5.0Fair✓ wins
2.5Limited
Travel
7.0Good
7.0Good
Wildlife
4.5Fair
6.5Good✓ wins
Vlogging
4.0Fair
7.0Good✓ wins

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

X3

  • Stabilization modes

    Adds FlowState, 360° Horizon Lock, Active HDR

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 46, 114, 33.1

  • Card types

    Adds microSD

  • Resolution

    72 MP vs 20.4 MP — higher is better

  • Weight

    180 g vs 599 g — lower is better

  • Internal RAW video

    Only X3 supports it

  • Headphone jack (3.5mm)

    Only X3 supports it

  • Max video bit rate

    200 Mbps vs 150 Mbps — higher is better

Reasons to choose

OM-1 II

  • AF points / zones

    1053 vs 0 — higher is better

  • Subject recognition

    Adds People, Birds, Animals…

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 134.8, 91.6, 72.7

  • Card types

    Adds SD UHS-II, SD UHS-I

  • ISO max (native)

    102,400 vs 6,400 — higher is better

  • Burst (electronic)

    120 fps vs 15 fps — higher is better

  • 1080p max frame rate

    240 fps vs 60 fps — higher is better

  • Eye AF

    Only OM-1 II supports it

Both cameras share

  • Pre-Capture / Pre-ReleaseBoth support pre-capture / pre-release
  • Weather sealingBoth support weather sealing
  • Card slotsBoth 1
  • TouchscreenBoth support touchscreen
  • Wi-FiBoth support wi-fi
  • BluetoothBoth support bluetooth

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

X3

Pros

  • 72MP 360 photos
  • 5.7K60 360 video
  • Great value used
  • 10m waterproof

Cons

  • No 8K vs X4
  • Single-lens capped at 4K30
  • Older AI editing

OM-1 II

Pros

  • 120fps stills
  • Stacked MFT
  • IP53 weather sealing
  • Computational features

Cons

  • MFT sensor size
  • Smaller ecosystem
  • Menu complexity

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the X3 and OM-1 II at major authorized retailers.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Full specifications

= category winner

X3
OM-1 II
Resolution
72 MP3.5× more
20.4 MP
Sensor type
Dual 1/2" CMOS (360°)
4/3 Stacked BSI Live MOS
Sensor size
1/2"
17.4 x 13.0 mm
AA filter
No
X3
OM-1 II
Aperture
f/1.9
Focal length (35mm equiv.)
6.7 mm
X3
OM-1 II
Processor
Image processor
TruePic X
X3
OM-1 II
ISO min (native)
100
80−20 less
ISO max (native)
6,400
102,400+4 stops
ISO max (expanded)
6,400
102,400
X3
OM-1 II
Shutter type
Electronic shutter
Computerised focal-plane shutter + electronic shutter
Max mechanical speed
1/8000 sec
1/8000 sec
Max electronic speed
1/8000 sec
1/32000 sec

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for sports, X3 or OM-1 II?

OM-1 II scores 10.0/10 versus 5.0/10 for X3 — 120fps burst — pro-level action capture.

What's the resolution difference between the X3 and OM-1 II?

X3 is 72 MP and OM-1 II is 20.4 MP, so the X3 captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the X3 and OM-1 II have in-body image stabilization?

X3 uses FlowState + 360° Horizon Lock (electronic), while OM-1 II has 8.5-stop in-body image stabilization.

Which shoots faster bursts — the X3 or the OM-1 II?

X3 reaches 15 fps electronic. OM-1 II reaches 120 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the X3 and OM-1 II?

X3 weighs 180 g and OM-1 II weighs 599 g, so the X3 is 419 g lighter.

Do the X3 and OM-1 II record 4K video?

X3: 4K up to 30p. OM-1 II: 4K up to 60p.

Are the X3 and OM-1 II weather sealed?

X3: Yes. OM-1 II: Yes.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 640 shots (CIPA) for the X3 and 520 shots for the OM-1 II, giving the X3 the edge.

How much does each cost?

X3 launched at $449 and OM-1 II at $2,399. The X3 is $1,950 less.

Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.

Add any camera to get a three-way X3 vs OM-1 II vs X comparison.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed July 2026.

Product images courtesy of Insta360 and OM System press materials.