Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg Compare

Leica

CL

Compact APS-C L-mount rangefinder-style body.

$2,795

Released Nov 2017

vs

Leica

M11-P

Discreet professional M11 with 60MP full-frame sensor, 256GB internal memory, sapphire display glass, and Content Credentials.

$9,195

Released Oct 2023

M11-P is 5.9 years newer.

Wins

8categories

CL

WildlifeTravel

Wins

5categories

M11-P

Landscape

3 categories tied

TL;DR — Key differences

CL wins 4 categories·M11-P wins 1 categories
  • ACL has higher AF points / zones (49 vs 0)
  • ACL has higher IBIS effectiveness (6 stops vs 0 stops)
  • ACL has higher RAW buffer depth (60 frames vs 15 frames)
  • ACL has higher Burst (electronic) (15 fps vs 4.5 fps)
  • BM11-P has higher Resolution (60.3 MP vs 24.2 MP)

Key specs at a glance

CLM11-P
Resolution24.2 MP60.3 MP
SensorAPS-CFull Frame
ISO max25,60050,000
Burst15 fps4.5 fps
4K60 fps60 fps
IBIS6-stopNo
Weight520 g530 g
Battery640 shots700 shots

Size and weight, to scale

CL

138 × 98 × 88 mm

520 g (1.15 lb / 18.34 oz)

M11-P

139 × 80 × 39 mm

530 g (1.17 lb / 18.70 oz)

CL is 1mm narrower than M11-P but it is also 18mm taller and 50mm thicker.

CL is 10 g lighter than M11-P.

Depth (front-to-back): 88mm CL · 39mm M11-P

Sensor size, to scale

CL

23.5 × 15.6 mm · APS-C

367 mm² area

M11-P

36 × 24 mm · Full Frame

864 mm² area

2.4× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

CL

✓ more lenses

Leica L

80+

native lenses available

30 first-party50 third-party

M11-P: mount data unavailable

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseCLM11-P
Portrait
6.5Good✓ wins
5.5Fair
Sports & Action
6.0Good✓ wins
0.5Limited
Video & Hybrid
6.0Good✓ wins
2.5Limited
Landscape
5.0Fair
6.5Good✓ wins
Travel
8.5Excellent✓ wins
5.0Fair
Wildlife
9.0Excellent✓ wins
0.0Limited
Vlogging
7.0Good✓ wins
3.5Limited

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

CL

  • AF points / zones

    49 vs 0 — higher is better

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Human, Animal, Bird…

  • Codecs

    Adds H.265, H.264

  • IBIS effectiveness

    6 stops vs 0 stops — higher is better

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 138, 98, 88

  • RAW buffer depth

    60 frames vs 15 frames — higher is better

  • Burst (electronic)

    15 fps vs 4.5 fps — higher is better

  • Eye AF

    Only CL supports it

Reasons to choose

M11-P

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 139, 80, 38.5

  • Resolution

    60.3 MP vs 24.2 MP — higher is better

  • EVF resolution

    5,760,000 vs 2,360,000 — higher is better

  • ISO max (native)

    50,000 vs 25,600 — higher is better

  • ISO min (native)

    64 vs 100 — lower is better

  • Battery life (CIPA)

    700 shots vs 640 shots — higher is better

Both cameras share

  • 4K max frame rateBoth 60 fps
  • Max video bit rateBoth 150 Mbps
  • EVF refresh rateBoth 120 Hz
  • TouchscreenBoth support touchscreen
  • Wi-FiBoth support wi-fi
  • BluetoothBoth support bluetooth

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

CL

Pros

  • Beautiful design
  • Compact
  • L-mount

Cons

  • Older
  • 24MP APS-C
  • Limited lens selection

M11-P

Pros

  • 60MP full-frame
  • 256GB internal memory
  • Content Credentials
  • Sapphire display glass

Cons

  • Manual focus only
  • No video
  • Very expensive

Full specifications

= category winner

CL
M11-P
Resolution
24.2 MP
60.3 MP2.5× more
Sensor type
APS-C CMOS
Full-frame BSI CMOS
Sensor size
23.5 × 15.6 mm
36 x 24 mm
AA filter
No
No
CL
M11-P
AF system
Contrast-detect AF
Manual focus rangefinder
AF points / zones
49
0
AF frame coverage
100 %
AF low-light limit
-3 EV
Eye AF
Yes
No
Animal / bird AF
Yes
No
Subject recognition
Human, Animal, Bird, Vehicle
CL
M11-P
Burst (mechanical)
6 fps+33%
4.5 fps
Burst (electronic)
15 fps3.3× more
4.5 fps
Pre-Capture / Pre-Release
Yes
No
RAW buffer depth
60 frames4× more
15 frames
CL
M11-P
Max resolution
4K UHD
No video
4K max frame rate
60 fps
60 fps
Max video bit rate
150 Mbps
150 Mbps
Internal RAW video
No
No
Log profile
Standard profiles
None
Codecs
H.265, H.264
CL
M11-P
Weight
520 g−10 g less
530 g
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
138 × 98 × 88 mm
139 × 80 × 38.5 mm
Weather sealing
Yes
No

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for wildlife, CL or M11-P?

CL scores 9.0/10 versus 0.0/10 for M11-P — Bird AF subject recognition.

What's the resolution difference between the CL and M11-P?

CL is 24.2 MP and M11-P is 60.3 MP, so the M11-P captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the CL and M11-P have in-body image stabilization?

CL has 6-stop in-body image stabilization, while m11-P does not have IBIS.

Which shoots faster bursts — the CL or the M11-P?

CL reaches 15 fps electronic. M11-P reaches 4.5 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the CL and M11-P?

CL weighs 520 g and M11-P weighs 530 g, so the CL is 10 g lighter.

Do the CL and M11-P record 4K video?

CL: 4K up to 60p. M11-P: 4K up to 60p.

Are the CL and M11-P weather sealed?

CL: Yes. M11-P: No.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 640 shots (CIPA) for the CL and 700 shots for the M11-P, giving the M11-P the edge.

How much does each cost?

CL launched at $2,795 and M11-P at $9,195. The CL is $6,400 less.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed May 2026.