Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg Compare

Leica

CL

Compact APS-C L-mount rangefinder-style body.

$2,795

Released Nov 2017

vs

Leica

SL3

60MP L-mount flagship with 8K video and Leica color science.

$6,995

Released Mar 2024

SL3 is 6.3 years newer.

Wins

2categories

CL

WildlifeTravel

Wins

7categories

SL3

LandscapeVideo & Hybrid

6 categories tied

TL;DR — Key differences

CL wins 0 categories·SL3 wins 5 categories
  • BSL3 has higher AF points / zones (779 vs 49)
  • BSL3 has higher ISO max (native) (100,000 vs 25,600)
  • BSL3 has higher Resolution (60.3 MP vs 24.2 MP)
  • BSL3 has higher EVF resolution (5,760,000 vs 2,360,000)
  • BSL3 has lower ISO min (native) (50 vs 100)

Key specs at a glance

CLSL3
Resolution24.2 MP60.3 MP
SensorAPS-CFull Frame
ISO max25,600100,000
Burst15 fps30 fps
4K60 fps60 fps
IBIS6-stop5-stop
Weight520 g769 g
Battery640 shots

Size and weight, to scale

CL

138 × 98 × 88 mm

520 g (1.15 lb / 18.34 oz)

SL3

141 × 108 × 85 mm

769 g (1.70 lb / 27.13 oz)

CL is 3mm narrower and 10mm shorter than SL3 but it is also 3mm thicker.

CL is 249 g lighter than SL3.

Depth (front-to-back): 88mm CL · 85mm SL3

Sensor size, to scale

CL

23.5 × 15.6 mm · APS-C

367 mm² area

SL3

36 × 24 mm · Full Frame

864 mm² area

2.4× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

CL

✓ more lenses

Leica L

80+

native lenses available

30 first-party50 third-party

SL3

✓ more lenses

Leica L

80+

native lenses available

30 first-party50 third-party

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseCLSL3
Portrait
6.5Good
8.5Excellent✓ wins
Sports & Action
6.0Good✓ wins
5.5Fair
Video & Hybrid
6.0Good
9.0Excellent✓ wins
Landscape
5.0Fair
10.0Excellent✓ wins
Travel
8.5Excellent✓ wins
3.5Limited
Wildlife
9.0Excellent✓ wins
6.5Good
Vlogging
7.0Good✓ wins
5.5Fair

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

CL

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 138, 98, 88

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Bird, Vehicle

  • Pre-Capture / Pre-Release

    Only CL supports it

  • Weight

    520 g vs 769 g — lower is better

  • IBIS effectiveness

    6 stops vs 5 stops — higher is better

Reasons to choose

SL3

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 141.2, 108, 84.6

  • AF points / zones

    779 vs 49 — higher is better

  • ISO max (native)

    100,000 vs 25,600 — higher is better

  • Resolution

    60.3 MP vs 24.2 MP — higher is better

  • EVF resolution

    5,760,000 vs 2,360,000 — higher is better

  • ISO min (native)

    50 vs 100 — lower is better

  • Burst (electronic)

    30 fps vs 15 fps — higher is better

  • Internal RAW video

    Only SL3 supports it

Both cameras share

  • AF frame coverageBoth 100 %
  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • Animal / bird AFBoth support animal / bird af
  • 4K max frame rateBoth 60 fps
  • Max video bit rateBoth 150 Mbps
  • In-body stabilizationBoth support in-body stabilization

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

CL

Pros

  • Beautiful design
  • Compact
  • L-mount

Cons

  • Older
  • 24MP APS-C
  • Limited lens selection

SL3

Pros

  • 60MP
  • 8K video
  • Leica build
  • L-mount

Cons

  • Very expensive
  • Heavy
  • Large files

Full specifications

= category winner

CL
SL3
Resolution
24.2 MP
60.3 MP2.5× more
Sensor type
APS-C CMOS
Full-frame BSI CMOS
Sensor size
23.5 × 15.6 mm
36 x 24 mm
AA filter
No
No
CL
SL3
AF system
Contrast-detect AF
Phase detection AF + contrast AF
AF points / zones
49
77915.9× more
AF frame coverage
100 %
100 %
AF low-light limit
-3 EV
Eye AF
Yes
Yes
Animal / bird AF
Yes
Yes
Subject recognition
Human, Animal, Bird, Vehicle
Human, Animal
CL
SL3
Burst (mechanical)
6 fps
7 fps+17%
Burst (electronic)
15 fps
30 fps2× more
Pre-Capture / Pre-Release
Yes
No
RAW buffer depth
60 frames
CL
SL3
Max resolution
4K UHD
8K / C8K
4K max frame rate
60 fps
60 fps
Max video bit rate
150 Mbps
150 Mbps
Internal RAW video
No
Yes
Log profile
Standard profiles
L-Log / HLG
Codecs
H.265, H.264
H.265, H.264, Apple ProRes
CL
SL3
Weight
520 g−249 g less
769 g
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
138 × 98 × 88 mm
141.2 × 108 × 84.6 mm
Weather sealing
Yes
Yes

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for landscape, CL or SL3?

SL3 scores 10.0/10 versus 5.0/10 for CL — 60.3MP — massive detail for large prints.

What's the resolution difference between the CL and SL3?

CL is 24.2 MP and SL3 is 60.3 MP, so the SL3 captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the CL and SL3 have in-body image stabilization?

CL has 6-stop in-body image stabilization, while sL3 has 5-stop in-body image stabilization.

Which shoots faster bursts — the CL or the SL3?

CL reaches 15 fps electronic. SL3 reaches 30 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the CL and SL3?

CL weighs 520 g and SL3 weighs 769 g, so the CL is 249 g lighter.

Do the CL and SL3 record 4K video?

CL: 4K up to 60p. SL3: 8K / C8K (max), 4K up to 60p.

Are the CL and SL3 weather sealed?

CL: Yes. SL3: Yes.

How much does each cost?

CL launched at $2,795 and SL3 at $6,995. The CL is $4,200 less.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed May 2026.