Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg
EOS R6 Mark II

Canon

EOS R6 Mark II

Versatile 24.2MP full-frame hybrid with class-leading AF and 4K 60p video.

$2,499

Launch price

Released Nov 2022

vs
SL3

Leica

SL3

60MP L-mount flagship with 8K video and Leica color science.

$6,995

Launch price

Released Mar 2024

SL3 is 1.3 years newer.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Wins

7categories

EOS R6 Mark II

Sports & ActionPortrait

Wins

4categories

SL3

LandscapeVideo & Hybrid

4 categories tied

Which would you choose?

TL;DR — Key differences

EOS R6 Mark II wins 3 categories·SL3 wins 2 categories
  • BSL3 has higher Resolution (60.3 MP vs 24.2 MP)
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher Max video bit rate (340 Mbps vs 150 Mbps)
  • BSL3 has lower ISO min (native) (50 vs 100)
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher Burst (mechanical) (12 fps vs 7 fps)
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher IBIS effectiveness (8 stops vs 5 stops)

Key specs at a glance

EOS R6 Mark IISL3
Resolution24.2 MP60.3 MP
SensorFull FrameFull Frame
ISO max102,400100,000
Burst40 fps30 fps
4K60 fps60 fps
IBIS8-stop5-stop
Weight670 g769 g
Battery760 shots

Size and weight, to scale

EOS R6 Mark II front view

EOS R6 Mark II

138 × 98 × 88 mm

670 g (1.48 lb / 23.63 oz)

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

for scale

SL3 front view

SL3

141 × 108 × 85 mm

769 g (1.70 lb / 27.13 oz)

EOS R6 Mark II is 3mm narrower and 10mm shorter than SL3 but it is also 4mm thicker.

EOS R6 Mark II is 99 g lighter than SL3.

Depth (front-to-back): 88mm EOS R6 Mark II · 85mm SL3

Back view, to scale

Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.

EOS R6 Mark II back view

EOS R6 Mark II

138 × 98 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

SL3 back view

SL3

141 × 108 mm

Top view, to scale

Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.

EOS R6 Mark II top view

EOS R6 Mark II

138 × 88 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

SL3 top view

SL3

141 × 85 mm

Sensor size, to scale

EOS R6 Mark II

35.9 × 23.9 mm · Full Frame

858 mm² area

SL3

36 × 24 mm · Full Frame

864 mm² area

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

EOS R6 Mark II

✓ more lenses

Canon RF

105+

native lenses available

45 first-party60 third-party

SL3

Leica L

80+

native lenses available

30 first-party50 third-party

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseEOS R6 Mark IISL3
Portrait
8.5Excellent
8.5Excellent
Sports & Action
9.0Excellent✓ wins
6.0Good
Video & Hybrid
7.5Good
9.0Excellent✓ wins
Landscape
7.0Good
10.0Excellent✓ wins
Travel
7.5Good✓ wins
3.5Limited
Wildlife
6.5Good
6.5Good
Vlogging
8.0Excellent✓ wins
5.5Fair

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

EOS R6 Mark II

  • Subject recognition

    Adds People, Dogs, Cats…

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 138.4, 98.4, 88.4

  • Max video bit rate

    340 Mbps vs 150 Mbps — higher is better

  • AA filter

    Only EOS R6 Mark II supports it

  • Pre-Capture / Pre-Release

    Only EOS R6 Mark II supports it

  • Burst (mechanical)

    12 fps vs 7 fps — higher is better

  • IBIS effectiveness

    8 stops vs 5 stops — higher is better

  • AF points / zones

    1053 vs 779 — higher is better

Reasons to choose

SL3

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Human, Animal

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 141.2, 108, 84.6

  • Resolution

    60.3 MP vs 24.2 MP — higher is better

  • ISO min (native)

    50 vs 100 — lower is better

  • Card types

    Adds CFexpress Type B

  • EVF resolution

    5,760,000 vs 3,690,000 — higher is better

  • Codecs

    Adds Apple ProRes

  • EVF magnification

    0.78 × vs 0.76 × — higher is better

Both cameras share

  • AF frame coverageBoth 100 %
  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • Animal / bird AFBoth support animal / bird af
  • 4K max frame rateBoth 60 fps
  • Internal RAW videoBoth support internal raw video
  • In-body stabilization (IBIS)Both support in-body stabilization (ibis)

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

EOS R6 Mark II

Pros

  • Up to 40fps electronic burst
  • 4K 60p oversampled from 6K
  • Dual Pixel CMOS AF II — superb subject tracking
  • 8-stop IBIS
  • Fully articulating touchscreen

Cons

  • 24.2MP may feel limiting for large prints
  • No CFexpress on base body
  • Short battery life vs. A7 IV

SL3

Pros

  • 60MP
  • 8K video
  • Leica build
  • L-mount

Cons

  • Very expensive
  • Heavy
  • Large files

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the EOS R6 Mark II and SL3 at major authorized retailers.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Full specifications

= category winner

EOS R6 Mark II
SL3
Resolution
24.2 MP
60.3 MP2.5× more
Sensor type
Full Frame CMOS
Full-frame BSI CMOS
Sensor size
35.9 × 23.9 mm
36 x 24 mm
AA filter
Yes
No
EOS R6 Mark II
SL3
Processor
DIGIC X
Maestro IV
EOS R6 Mark II
SL3
ISO min (native)
100
50−50 less
ISO max (native)
102,400
100,000
ISO max (expanded)
204,800
100,000
EOS R6 Mark II
SL3
Shutter type
Mechanical + Electronic
Mechanical focal-plane + electronic shutter
Max mechanical speed
1/8000 sec
1/8000 sec
Max electronic speed
1/16000 sec
1/16000 sec

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for travel, EOS R6 Mark II or SL3?

EOS R6 Mark II scores 7.5/10 versus 3.5/10 for SL3 — 670g — manageable for travel.

What's the resolution difference between the EOS R6 Mark II and SL3?

EOS R6 Mark II is 24.2 MP and SL3 is 60.3 MP, so the SL3 captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the EOS R6 Mark II and SL3 have in-body image stabilization?

EOS R6 Mark II has 8-stop in-body image stabilization, while SL3 has 5-stop in-body image stabilization.

Which shoots faster bursts — the EOS R6 Mark II or the SL3?

EOS R6 Mark II reaches 40 fps electronic. SL3 reaches 30 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the EOS R6 Mark II and SL3?

EOS R6 Mark II weighs 670 g and SL3 weighs 769 g, so the EOS R6 Mark II is 99 g lighter.

Do the EOS R6 Mark II and SL3 record 4K video?

EOS R6 Mark II: 4K up to 60p. SL3: 8K / C8K (max), 4K up to 60p.

Are the EOS R6 Mark II and SL3 weather sealed?

EOS R6 Mark II: Yes. SL3: Yes.

How much does each cost?

EOS R6 Mark II launched at $2,499 and SL3 at $6,995. The EOS R6 Mark II is $4,496 less.

Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.

Add any camera to get a three-way EOS R6 Mark II vs SL3 vs X comparison.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed July 2026.

Product images courtesy of Canon and Leica press materials.