Leica
Q3 43
Q3 variant with 43mm equivalent perspective for classic reportage.
$5,995
Released Jun 2024
Q3 43 is 6.6 years newer.
Wins
CL
Wins
Q3 43
3 categories tied
TL;DR — Key differences
- BQ3 43 has higher ISO max (native) (100,000 vs 25,600)
- BQ3 43 has higher Resolution (60.3 MP vs 24.2 MP)
- BQ3 43 has higher EVF resolution (5,760,000 vs 2,360,000)
- BQ3 43 has lower ISO min (native) (50 vs 100)
- ACL has higher Card slots (2 vs 1)
Key specs at a glance
Size and weight, to scale
CL
138 × 98 × 88 mm
520 g (1.15 lb / 18.34 oz)
Q3 43
130 × 80 × 92 mm
743 g (1.64 lb / 26.21 oz)
CL is 4mm thinner than Q3 43 but it is also 8mm wider and 18mm taller.
CL is 223 g lighter than Q3 43.
Depth (front-to-back): 88mm CL · 92mm Q3 43
Sensor size, to scale
CL
23.5 × 15.6 mm · APS-C
367 mm² area
Q3 43
36 × 24 mm · Full Frame
864 mm² area
2.4× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.
Lens ecosystem
Native lens selection
CL
✓ more lensesLeica L
80+
native lenses available
Q3 43: mount data unavailable
Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.
Use-case scoring
Which one for what?
Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class
Why pick one over the other
Reasons to choose
CL
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
Adds 138, 98, 88
Subject recognition
Adds Bird, Vehicle
Pre-Capture / Pre-Release
Only CL supports it
In-body stabilization
Only CL supports it
Card slots
2 vs 1 — higher is better
Microphone jack (3.5mm)
Only CL supports it
Headphone jack (3.5mm)
Only CL supports it
Battery life (CIPA)
640 shots vs 350 shots — higher is better
Reasons to choose
Q3 43
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
Adds 130, 80, 92
ISO max (native)
100,000 vs 25,600 — higher is better
Resolution
60.3 MP vs 24.2 MP — higher is better
EVF resolution
5,760,000 vs 2,360,000 — higher is better
ISO min (native)
50 vs 100 — lower is better
Subject recognition
Adds Face, Eye
Codecs
Adds ProRes
EVF magnification
0.79 × vs 0.78 × — higher is better
Both cameras share
- ✓Eye AF — Both support eye af
- ✓Animal / bird AF — Both support animal / bird af
- ✓Burst (electronic) — Both 15 fps
- ✓4K max frame rate — Both 60 fps
- ✓Max video bit rate — Both 150 Mbps
- ✓Weather sealing — Both support weather sealing
Pros & cons at a glance
Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.
CL
Pros
- ✓Beautiful design
- ✓Compact
- ✓L-mount
Cons
- –Older
- –24MP APS-C
- –Limited lens selection
Q3 43
Pros
- ✓Unique 43mm view
- ✓60MP
- ✓Premium compact
Cons
- –Fixed lens
- –Expensive
- –Niche focal length
Full specifications
✓ = category winner
Frequently asked
Quick answers generated from verified specs.
Which is better for travel, CL or Q3 43?
CL scores 8.5/10 versus 4.5/10 for Q3 43 — 520g — compact and travel-friendly.
What's the resolution difference between the CL and Q3 43?
CL is 24.2 MP and Q3 43 is 60.3 MP, so the Q3 43 captures more detail for cropping and large prints.
Do the CL and Q3 43 have in-body image stabilization?
CL has 6-stop in-body image stabilization, while q3 43 does not have IBIS.
Which shoots faster bursts — the CL or the Q3 43?
CL reaches 15 fps electronic. Q3 43 reaches 15 fps electronic.
What's the weight difference between the CL and Q3 43?
CL weighs 520 g and Q3 43 weighs 743 g, so the CL is 223 g lighter.
Do the CL and Q3 43 record 4K video?
CL: 4K up to 60p. Q3 43: 8K (max), 4K up to 60p.
Are the CL and Q3 43 weather sealed?
CL: Yes. Q3 43: Yes.
Which has better battery life?
Rated battery life is 640 shots (CIPA) for the CL and 350 shots for the Q3 43, giving the CL the edge.
How much does each cost?
CL launched at $2,795 and Q3 43 at $5,995. The CL is $3,200 less.
Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed May 2026.