Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg

Leica

CL

Compact APS-C L-mount rangefinder-style body.

$2,795

Launch price

Released Nov 2017

vs

Leica

Q3 43

Q3 variant with 43mm equivalent perspective for classic reportage.

$5,995

Launch price

Released Jun 2024

Q3 43 is 6.6 years newer.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Wins

4categories

CL

WildlifeTravel

Wins

5categories

Q3 43

LandscapePortrait

3 categories tied

Which would you choose?

TL;DR — Key differences

CL wins 1 categories·Q3 43 wins 4 categories
  • BQ3 43 has higher ISO max (native) (100,000 vs 25,600)
  • BQ3 43 has higher Resolution (60.3 MP vs 24.2 MP)
  • BQ3 43 has higher EVF resolution (5,760,000 vs 2,360,000)
  • BQ3 43 has lower ISO min (native) (50 vs 100)
  • ACL has higher Card slots (2 vs 1)

Key specs at a glance

CLQ3 43
Resolution24.2 MP60.3 MP
SensorAPS-CFull Frame
ISO max25,600100,000
Burst15 fps15 fps
4K60 fps60 fps
IBIS6-stopNo
Weight520 g743 g
Battery640 shots350 shots

Size and weight, to scale

CL

138 × 98 × 88 mm

520 g (1.15 lb / 18.34 oz)

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

for scale

Q3 43

130 × 80 × 92 mm

743 g (1.64 lb / 26.21 oz)

CL is 4mm thinner than Q3 43 but it is also 8mm wider and 18mm taller.

CL is 223 g lighter than Q3 43.

Depth (front-to-back): 88mm CL · 92mm Q3 43

Sensor size, to scale

CL

23.5 × 15.6 mm · APS-C

367 mm² area

Q3 43

36 × 24 mm · Full Frame

864 mm² area

2.4× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

CL

✓ more lenses

Leica L

80+

native lenses available

30 first-party50 third-party

Q3 43: mount data unavailable

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseCLQ3 43
Portrait
6.5Good
7.5Good✓ wins
Sports & Action
6.5Good✓ wins
5.0Fair
Video & Hybrid
6.0Good✓ wins
5.5Fair
Landscape
5.0Fair
8.0Excellent✓ wins
Travel
8.5Excellent✓ wins
4.5Fair
Wildlife
9.0Excellent✓ wins
5.5Fair
Vlogging
7.0Good✓ wins
3.0Limited

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

CL

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 138, 98, 88

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Bird, Vehicle

  • Pre-Capture / Pre-Release

    Only CL supports it

  • In-body stabilization (IBIS)

    Only CL supports it

  • Card slots

    2 vs 1 — higher is better

  • Microphone jack (3.5mm)

    Only CL supports it

  • Headphone jack (3.5mm)

    Only CL supports it

  • Battery life (CIPA)

    640 shots vs 350 shots — higher is better

Reasons to choose

Q3 43

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 130, 80, 92

  • ISO max (native)

    100,000 vs 25,600 — higher is better

  • Resolution

    60.3 MP vs 24.2 MP — higher is better

  • EVF resolution

    5,760,000 vs 2,360,000 — higher is better

  • ISO min (native)

    50 vs 100 — lower is better

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Face, Eye

  • Codecs

    Adds ProRes

  • EVF magnification

    0.79 × vs 0.78 × — higher is better

Both cameras share

  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • Animal / bird AFBoth support animal / bird af
  • Burst (electronic)Both 15 fps
  • 4K max frame rateBoth 60 fps
  • Max video bit rateBoth 150 Mbps
  • Weather sealingBoth support weather sealing

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

CL

Pros

  • Beautiful design
  • Compact
  • L-mount

Cons

  • Older
  • 24MP APS-C
  • Limited lens selection

Q3 43

Pros

  • Unique 43mm view
  • 60MP
  • Premium compact

Cons

  • Fixed lens
  • Expensive
  • Niche focal length

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the CL and Q3 43 at major authorized retailers.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Full specifications

= category winner

CL
Q3 43
Resolution
24.2 MP
60.3 MP2.5× more
Sensor type
APS-C CMOS
Full-frame BSI CMOS
Sensor size
23.5 × 15.6 mm
36 x 24 mm
AA filter
No
No
CL
Q3 43
Aperture
f/2
Focal length (35mm equiv.)
43 mm
CL
Q3 43
Processor
Maestro IV
Maestro Series processor with L2 Technology
CL
Q3 43
ISO min (native)
100
50−50 less
ISO max (native)
25,600
100,000+2 stops
ISO max (expanded)
102,400
100,000
CL
Q3 43
Shutter type
Mechanical + Electronic
Electronic + mechanical shutter
Max mechanical speed
1/8000 sec
1/2000 sec
Max electronic speed
1/16000 sec
1/16000 sec

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for travel, CL or Q3 43?

CL scores 8.5/10 versus 4.5/10 for Q3 43 — 520g — compact and travel-friendly.

What's the resolution difference between the CL and Q3 43?

CL is 24.2 MP and Q3 43 is 60.3 MP, so the Q3 43 captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the CL and Q3 43 have in-body image stabilization?

CL has 6-stop in-body image stabilization, while Q3 43 does not have IBIS.

Which shoots faster bursts — the CL or the Q3 43?

CL reaches 15 fps electronic. Q3 43 reaches 15 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the CL and Q3 43?

CL weighs 520 g and Q3 43 weighs 743 g, so the CL is 223 g lighter.

Do the CL and Q3 43 record 4K video?

CL: 4K up to 60p. Q3 43: 8K (max), 4K up to 60p.

Are the CL and Q3 43 weather sealed?

CL: Yes. Q3 43: Yes.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 640 shots (CIPA) for the CL and 350 shots for the Q3 43, giving the CL the edge.

How much does each cost?

CL launched at $2,795 and Q3 43 at $5,995. The CL is $3,200 less.

Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.

Add any camera to get a three-way CL vs Q3 43 vs X comparison.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed July 2026.