Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg Compare

Leica

CL

Compact APS-C L-mount rangefinder-style body.

$2,795

Released Nov 2017

vs

Leica

Q3 Monochrom

Monochrome full-frame Q3 with 60MP sensor and fixed Summilux 28mm f/1.7 lens for black-and-white reportage.

$6,795

Released Nov 2025

Q3 Monochrom is 7.9 years newer.

Wins

4categories

CL

WildlifeTravel

Wins

5categories

Q3 Monochrom

LandscapePortrait

3 categories tied

TL;DR — Key differences

CL wins 1 categories·Q3 Monochrom wins 4 categories
  • BQ3 Monochrom has higher ISO max (native) (200,000 vs 25,600)
  • BQ3 Monochrom has higher Resolution (60.3 MP vs 24.2 MP)
  • BQ3 Monochrom has higher EVF resolution (5,760,000 vs 2,360,000)
  • BQ3 Monochrom has lower ISO min (native) (50 vs 100)
  • ACL has higher Card slots (2 vs 1)

Key specs at a glance

CLQ3 Monochrom
Resolution24.2 MP60.3 MP
SensorAPS-CFull Frame
ISO max25,600200,000
Burst15 fps15 fps
4K60 fps60 fps
IBIS6-stopNo
Weight520 g743 g
Battery640 shots350 shots

Size and weight, to scale

CL

138 × 98 × 88 mm

520 g (1.15 lb / 18.34 oz)

Q3 Monochrom

130 × 80 × 92 mm

743 g (1.64 lb / 26.21 oz)

CL is 4mm thinner than Q3 Monochrom but it is also 8mm wider and 18mm taller.

CL is 223 g lighter than Q3 Monochrom.

Depth (front-to-back): 88mm CL · 92mm Q3 Monochrom

Sensor size, to scale

CL

23.5 × 15.6 mm · APS-C

367 mm² area

Q3 Monochrom

36 × 24 mm · Full Frame

864 mm² area

2.4× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

CL

✓ more lenses

Leica L

80+

native lenses available

30 first-party50 third-party

Q3 Monochrom: mount data unavailable

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseCLQ3 Monochrom
Portrait
6.5Good
7.5Good✓ wins
Sports & Action
6.0Good✓ wins
4.5Fair
Video & Hybrid
6.0Good✓ wins
5.5Fair
Landscape
5.0Fair
8.0Excellent✓ wins
Travel
8.5Excellent✓ wins
4.5Fair
Wildlife
9.0Excellent✓ wins
5.5Fair
Vlogging
7.0Good✓ wins
3.0Limited

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

CL

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 138, 98, 88

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Bird, Vehicle

  • Pre-Capture / Pre-Release

    Only CL supports it

  • In-body stabilization

    Only CL supports it

  • Card slots

    2 vs 1 — higher is better

  • Microphone jack (3.5mm)

    Only CL supports it

  • Headphone jack (3.5mm)

    Only CL supports it

  • Battery life (CIPA)

    640 shots vs 350 shots — higher is better

Reasons to choose

Q3 Monochrom

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 130, 80, 92

  • ISO max (native)

    200,000 vs 25,600 — higher is better

  • Resolution

    60.3 MP vs 24.2 MP — higher is better

  • EVF resolution

    5,760,000 vs 2,360,000 — higher is better

  • ISO min (native)

    50 vs 100 — lower is better

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Face, Eye

  • Codecs

    Adds ProRes

  • EVF magnification

    0.79 × vs 0.78 × — higher is better

Both cameras share

  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • Animal / bird AFBoth support animal / bird af
  • Burst (electronic)Both 15 fps
  • 4K max frame rateBoth 60 fps
  • Max video bit rateBoth 150 Mbps
  • Weather sealingBoth support weather sealing

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

CL

Pros

  • Beautiful design
  • Compact
  • L-mount

Cons

  • Older
  • 24MP APS-C
  • Limited lens selection

Q3 Monochrom

Pros

  • 60MP monochrome sensor
  • Summilux 28mm f/1.7
  • 8K video
  • IP52 sealed compact

Cons

  • Monochrome only
  • Fixed lens
  • Very expensive

Full specifications

= category winner

CL
Q3 Monochrom
Resolution
24.2 MP
60.3 MP2.5× more
Sensor type
APS-C CMOS
Full-frame monochrome BSI CMOS
Sensor size
23.5 × 15.6 mm
36 x 24 mm
AA filter
No
No
CL
Q3 Monochrom
AF system
Contrast-detect AF
Hybrid AF (phase detection + contrast AF + DFD)
AF points / zones
49
AF frame coverage
100 %
AF low-light limit
-3 EV
Eye AF
Yes
Yes
Animal / bird AF
Yes
Yes
Subject recognition
Human, Animal, Bird, Vehicle
Human, Face, Eye, Animal
CL
Q3 Monochrom
Burst (mechanical)
6 fps+50%
4 fps
Burst (electronic)
15 fps
15 fps
Pre-Capture / Pre-Release
Yes
No
RAW buffer depth
60 frames
CL
Q3 Monochrom
Max resolution
4K UHD
8K
4K max frame rate
60 fps
60 fps
Max video bit rate
150 Mbps
150 Mbps
Internal RAW video
No
No
Log profile
Standard profiles
L-Log / HLG
Codecs
H.265, H.264
H.265, H.264, ProRes
CL
Q3 Monochrom
Weight
520 g−223 g less
743 g
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
138 × 98 × 88 mm
130 × 80 × 92 mm
Weather sealing
Yes
Yes

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for travel, CL or Q3 Monochrom?

CL scores 8.5/10 versus 4.5/10 for Q3 Monochrom — 520g — compact and travel-friendly.

What's the resolution difference between the CL and Q3 Monochrom?

CL is 24.2 MP and Q3 Monochrom is 60.3 MP, so the Q3 Monochrom captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the CL and Q3 Monochrom have in-body image stabilization?

CL has 6-stop in-body image stabilization, while q3 Monochrom does not have IBIS.

Which shoots faster bursts — the CL or the Q3 Monochrom?

CL reaches 15 fps electronic. Q3 Monochrom reaches 15 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the CL and Q3 Monochrom?

CL weighs 520 g and Q3 Monochrom weighs 743 g, so the CL is 223 g lighter.

Do the CL and Q3 Monochrom record 4K video?

CL: 4K up to 60p. Q3 Monochrom: 8K (max), 4K up to 60p.

Are the CL and Q3 Monochrom weather sealed?

CL: Yes. Q3 Monochrom: Yes.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 640 shots (CIPA) for the CL and 350 shots for the Q3 Monochrom, giving the CL the edge.

How much does each cost?

CL launched at $2,795 and Q3 Monochrom at $6,795. The CL is $4,000 less.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed May 2026.