Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg

Leica

M (Typ 262)

Stills-only simplified Leica M with 24MP CMOS and no live view — pure rangefinder experience.

$5,195

Launch price

Released Nov 2015

vs
Alpha 7 IV

Sony

Alpha 7 IV

33MP hybrid all-rounder with 10-bit 4K 60p and AI-powered subject tracking.

$2,499

Launch price

Released Oct 2021

Alpha 7 IV is 5.9 years newer.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Wins

4categories

M (Typ 262)

WildlifePortrait

Wins

9categories

Alpha 7 IV

PortraitWildlife

5 categories tied

Which would you choose?

TL;DR — Key differences

M (Typ 262) wins 0 categories·Alpha 7 IV wins 5 categories
  • BAlpha 7 IV has higher AF points / zones (759 vs 49)
  • BAlpha 7 IV has higher RAW buffer depth (828 frames vs 60 frames)
  • BAlpha 7 IV has higher Max video bit rate (600 Mbps vs 150 Mbps)
  • BAlpha 7 IV has higher ISO max (native) (51,200 vs 25,600)
  • BAlpha 7 IV has higher Burst (mechanical) (10 fps vs 6 fps)

Key specs at a glance

M (Typ 262)Alpha 7 IV
Resolution24 MP33 MP
SensorFull FrameFull Frame
ISO max25,60051,200
Burst15 fps10 fps
4K60 fps60 fps
IBIS6-stop5.5-stop
Weight680 g658 g
Battery640 shots580 shots

Size and weight, to scale

M (Typ 262)

139 × 80 × 42 mm

680 g (1.50 lb / 23.99 oz)

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

for scale

Alpha 7 IV front view

Alpha 7 IV

131 × 96 × 80 mm

658 g (1.45 lb / 23.21 oz)

M (Typ 262) is 16mm shorter and 38mm thinner than Alpha 7 IV but it is also 8mm wider.

M (Typ 262) is 22 g heavier than Alpha 7 IV.

Depth (front-to-back): 42mm M (Typ 262) · 80mm Alpha 7 IV

Back view, to scale

Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.

M (Typ 262)

139 × 80 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

Alpha 7 IV back view

Alpha 7 IV

131 × 96 mm

Top view, to scale

Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.

M (Typ 262)

139 × 42 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

Alpha 7 IV top view

Alpha 7 IV

131 × 80 mm

Sensor size, to scale

M (Typ 262)

36 × 24 mm · Full Frame

864 mm² area

Alpha 7 IV

35.9 × 23.9 mm · Full Frame

858 mm² area

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

M (Typ 262): mount data unavailable

Alpha 7 IV

✓ more lenses

Sony E

350+

native lenses available

80 first-party270 third-party

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseM (Typ 262)Alpha 7 IV
Portrait
7.5Good
9.0Excellent✓ wins
Sports & Action
6.5Good
6.5Good
Video & Hybrid
6.0Good
7.5Good✓ wins
Landscape
7.0Good
7.5Good✓ wins
Travel
7.5Good✓ wins
7.0Good
Wildlife
8.0Excellent
8.0Excellent
Vlogging
5.5Fair
8.0Excellent✓ wins

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

M (Typ 262)

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 139, 80, 42

  • Pre-Capture / Pre-Release

    Only M (Typ 262) supports it

  • Burst (electronic)

    15 fps vs 10 fps — higher is better

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Vehicle

  • Battery life (CIPA)

    640 shots vs 580 shots — higher is better

  • IBIS effectiveness

    6 stops vs 5.5 stops — higher is better

  • AF frame coverage

    100 % vs 94 % — higher is better

Reasons to choose

Alpha 7 IV

  • AF low-light limit

    -4 EV vs -3 EV — lower is better

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 131.3, 96.4, 79.8

  • AF points / zones

    759 vs 49 — higher is better

  • RAW buffer depth

    828 frames vs 60 frames — higher is better

  • Max video bit rate

    600 Mbps vs 150 Mbps — higher is better

  • Codecs

    Adds XAVC HS, XAVC S, XAVC S-I

  • AA filter

    Only Alpha 7 IV supports it

  • ISO max (native)

    51,200 vs 25,600 — higher is better

Both cameras share

  • ISO min (native)Both 100
  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • Animal / bird AFBoth support animal / bird af
  • 4K max frame rateBoth 60 fps
  • In-body stabilization (IBIS)Both support in-body stabilization (ibis)
  • Weather sealingBoth support weather sealing

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

M (Typ 262)

Pros

  • Stills-only purity
  • 24MP CMOS
  • No video distraction
  • Simpler menus

Cons

  • No live view
  • No video
  • Superseded

Alpha 7 IV

Pros

  • 33MP — more detail for cropping and print
  • 10-bit 4K 60p (Super35 crop) / 4K 30p full-frame
  • Full-size HDMI port
  • 759 phase-detect AF points

Cons

  • 4K 60p requires Super35 crop
  • 10fps burst lags behind R6 II at 40fps
  • Complex menu system

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the M (Typ 262) and Alpha 7 IV at major authorized retailers.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Full specifications

= category winner

M (Typ 262)
Alpha 7 IV
Resolution
24 MP
33 MP+38%
Sensor type
Full Frame CMOS
Full Frame Exmor R CMOS
Sensor size
36.0 × 24.0 mm
35.9 × 23.9 mm
AA filter
No
Yes
M (Typ 262)
Alpha 7 IV
Processor
Maestro IV
BIONZ XR
M (Typ 262)
Alpha 7 IV
ISO min (native)
100
100
ISO max (native)
25,600
51,200+1 stop
ISO max (expanded)
102,400
204,800
M (Typ 262)
Alpha 7 IV
Shutter type
Mechanical + Electronic
Mechanical + Electronic
Max mechanical speed
1/8000 sec
1/8000 sec
Max electronic speed
1/16000 sec
1/8000 sec

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for vlogging, M (Typ 262) or Alpha 7 IV?

Alpha 7 IV scores 8.0/10 versus 5.5/10 for M (Typ 262) — Fully articulating screen — see yourself while filming.

What's the resolution difference between the M (Typ 262) and Alpha 7 IV?

M (Typ 262) is 24 MP and Alpha 7 IV is 33 MP, so the Alpha 7 IV captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the M (Typ 262) and Alpha 7 IV have in-body image stabilization?

M (Typ 262) has 6-stop in-body image stabilization, while Alpha 7 IV has 5.5-stop in-body image stabilization.

Which shoots faster bursts — the M (Typ 262) or the Alpha 7 IV?

M (Typ 262) reaches 15 fps electronic. Alpha 7 IV reaches 10 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the M (Typ 262) and Alpha 7 IV?

M (Typ 262) weighs 680 g and Alpha 7 IV weighs 658 g, so the Alpha 7 IV is 22 g lighter.

Do the M (Typ 262) and Alpha 7 IV record 4K video?

M (Typ 262): 4K up to 60p. Alpha 7 IV: 4K up to 60p.

Are the M (Typ 262) and Alpha 7 IV weather sealed?

M (Typ 262): Yes. Alpha 7 IV: Yes.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 640 shots (CIPA) for the M (Typ 262) and 580 shots for the Alpha 7 IV, giving the M (Typ 262) the edge.

How much does each cost?

M (Typ 262) launched at $5,195 and Alpha 7 IV at $2,499. The Alpha 7 IV is $2,696 less.

Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.

Add any camera to get a three-way M (Typ 262) vs Alpha 7 IV vs X comparison.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed June 2026.

Product images courtesy of Leica and Sony press materials.