Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg

Leica

M (Typ 262)

Stills-only simplified Leica M with 24MP CMOS and no live view — pure rangefinder experience.

$5,195

Launch price

Released Nov 2015

vs
SL3

Leica

SL3

60MP L-mount flagship with 8K video and Leica color science.

$6,995

Launch price

Released Mar 2024

SL3 is 8.3 years newer.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Wins

2categories

M (Typ 262)

WildlifePortrait

Wins

7categories

SL3

LandscapeVideo & Hybrid

6 categories tied

Which would you choose?

TL;DR — Key differences

M (Typ 262) wins 0 categories·SL3 wins 5 categories
  • BSL3 has higher AF points / zones (779 vs 49)
  • BSL3 has higher ISO max (native) (100,000 vs 25,600)
  • BSL3 has higher Resolution (60.3 MP vs 24 MP)
  • BSL3 has higher EVF resolution (5,760,000 vs 2,360,000)
  • BSL3 has lower ISO min (native) (50 vs 100)

Key specs at a glance

M (Typ 262)SL3
Resolution24 MP60.3 MP
SensorFull FrameFull Frame
ISO max25,600100,000
Burst15 fps30 fps
4K60 fps60 fps
IBIS6-stop5-stop
Weight680 g769 g
Battery640 shots

Size and weight, to scale

M (Typ 262)

139 × 80 × 42 mm

680 g (1.50 lb / 23.99 oz)

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

for scale

SL3 front view

SL3

141 × 108 × 85 mm

769 g (1.70 lb / 27.13 oz)

M (Typ 262) is 2mm narrower, 28mm shorter, and 43mm thinner than SL3.

M (Typ 262) is 89 g lighter than SL3.

Depth (front-to-back): 42mm M (Typ 262) · 85mm SL3

Back view, to scale

Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.

M (Typ 262)

139 × 80 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

SL3 back view

SL3

141 × 108 mm

Top view, to scale

Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.

M (Typ 262)

139 × 42 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

SL3 top view

SL3

141 × 85 mm

Sensor size, to scale

M (Typ 262)

36 × 24 mm · Full Frame

864 mm² area

SL3

36 × 24 mm · Full Frame

864 mm² area

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

M (Typ 262): mount data unavailable

SL3

✓ more lenses

Leica L

80+

native lenses available

30 first-party50 third-party

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseM (Typ 262)SL3
Portrait
7.5Good
8.5Excellent✓ wins
Sports & Action
6.5Good✓ wins
6.0Good
Video & Hybrid
6.0Good
9.0Excellent✓ wins
Landscape
7.0Good
10.0Excellent✓ wins
Travel
7.5Good✓ wins
3.5Limited
Wildlife
8.0Excellent✓ wins
6.5Good
Vlogging
5.5Fair
5.5Fair

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

M (Typ 262)

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 139, 80, 42

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Bird, Vehicle

  • Pre-Capture / Pre-Release

    Only M (Typ 262) supports it

  • IBIS effectiveness

    6 stops vs 5 stops — higher is better

  • Weight

    680 g vs 769 g — lower is better

Reasons to choose

SL3

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 141.2, 108, 84.6

  • AF points / zones

    779 vs 49 — higher is better

  • ISO max (native)

    100,000 vs 25,600 — higher is better

  • Resolution

    60.3 MP vs 24 MP — higher is better

  • EVF resolution

    5,760,000 vs 2,360,000 — higher is better

  • ISO min (native)

    50 vs 100 — lower is better

  • Burst (electronic)

    30 fps vs 15 fps — higher is better

  • Internal RAW video

    Only SL3 supports it

Both cameras share

  • AF frame coverageBoth 100 %
  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • Animal / bird AFBoth support animal / bird af
  • 4K max frame rateBoth 60 fps
  • Max video bit rateBoth 150 Mbps
  • In-body stabilization (IBIS)Both support in-body stabilization (ibis)

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

M (Typ 262)

Pros

  • Stills-only purity
  • 24MP CMOS
  • No video distraction
  • Simpler menus

Cons

  • No live view
  • No video
  • Superseded

SL3

Pros

  • 60MP
  • 8K video
  • Leica build
  • L-mount

Cons

  • Very expensive
  • Heavy
  • Large files

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the M (Typ 262) and SL3 at major authorized retailers.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Full specifications

= category winner

M (Typ 262)
SL3
Resolution
24 MP
60.3 MP2.5× more
Sensor type
Full Frame CMOS
Full-frame BSI CMOS
Sensor size
36.0 × 24.0 mm
36 x 24 mm
AA filter
No
No
M (Typ 262)
SL3
Processor
Maestro IV
Maestro IV
M (Typ 262)
SL3
ISO min (native)
100
50−50 less
ISO max (native)
25,600
100,000+2 stops
ISO max (expanded)
102,400
100,000
M (Typ 262)
SL3
Shutter type
Mechanical + Electronic
Mechanical focal-plane + electronic shutter
Max mechanical speed
1/8000 sec
1/8000 sec
Max electronic speed
1/16000 sec
1/16000 sec

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for travel, M (Typ 262) or SL3?

M (Typ 262) scores 7.5/10 versus 3.5/10 for SL3 — 680g — manageable for travel.

What's the resolution difference between the M (Typ 262) and SL3?

M (Typ 262) is 24 MP and SL3 is 60.3 MP, so the SL3 captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the M (Typ 262) and SL3 have in-body image stabilization?

M (Typ 262) has 6-stop in-body image stabilization, while SL3 has 5-stop in-body image stabilization.

Which shoots faster bursts — the M (Typ 262) or the SL3?

M (Typ 262) reaches 15 fps electronic. SL3 reaches 30 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the M (Typ 262) and SL3?

M (Typ 262) weighs 680 g and SL3 weighs 769 g, so the M (Typ 262) is 89 g lighter.

Do the M (Typ 262) and SL3 record 4K video?

M (Typ 262): 4K up to 60p. SL3: 8K / C8K (max), 4K up to 60p.

Are the M (Typ 262) and SL3 weather sealed?

M (Typ 262): Yes. SL3: Yes.

How much does each cost?

M (Typ 262) launched at $5,195 and SL3 at $6,995. The M (Typ 262) is $1,800 less.

Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.

Add any camera to get a three-way M (Typ 262) vs SL3 vs X comparison.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed June 2026.

Product images courtesy of Leica press materials.