Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg Compare

OM System

OM-1 II

Flagship MFT with stacked sensor, 120fps, and pro wildlife features.

$2,399

Released Feb 2024

vs

OM System

OM-D E-M5 Mark III

Compact pro MFT with IBIS and weather sealing.

$1,199

Released Oct 2019

OM-1 II is 4.3 years newer.

Wins

7categories

OM-1 II

Sports & ActionTravel

Wins

3categories

OM-D E-M5 Mark III

Sports & ActionWildlife

7 categories tied

Check current prices

Search these camera bodies at major authorized retailers to check current discounts, bundled lenses, and certified refurbished deals:

TL;DR — Key differences

OM-1 II wins 4 categories·OM-D E-M5 Mark III wins 1 categories
  • AOM-1 II has higher Burst (electronic) (120 fps vs 15 fps)
  • AOM-1 II has higher ISO max (native) (102,400 vs 25,600)
  • AOM-1 II has higher EVF resolution (5,760,000 vs 2,360,000)
  • BOM-D E-M5 Mark III has higher Card slots (2 vs 1)
  • AOM-1 II has higher Burst (mechanical) (10 fps vs 6 fps)

Key specs at a glance

OM-1 IIOM-D E-M5 Mark III
Resolution20.4 MP20.4 MP
SensorMFTMFT
ISO max102,40025,600
Burst120 fps15 fps
4K60 fps60 fps
IBIS8.5-stop6-stop
Weight599 g580 g
Battery520 shots640 shots

Size and weight, to scale

OM-1 II

135 × 92 × 73 mm

599 g (1.32 lb / 21.13 oz)

OM-D E-M5 Mark III

134 × 91 × 72 mm

580 g (1.28 lb / 20.46 oz)

OM-1 II is 1mm wider, 1mm taller, and 1mm thicker than OM-D E-M5 Mark III.

OM-1 II is 19 g heavier than OM-D E-M5 Mark III.

Depth (front-to-back): 73mm OM-1 II · 72mm OM-D E-M5 Mark III

Sensor size, to scale

OM-1 II

17.4 × 13 mm · Compact / large-type

226 mm² area

OM-D E-M5 Mark III

17.3 × 13 mm · Micro Four Thirds

225 mm² area

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

OM-1 II

✓ more lenses

Micro Four Thirds

130+

native lenses available

60 first-party70 third-party

OM-D E-M5 Mark III

✓ more lenses

Micro Four Thirds

130+

native lenses available

60 first-party70 third-party

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseOM-1 IIOM-D E-M5 Mark III
Portrait
4.0Fair
4.0Fair
Sports & Action
8.5Excellent✓ wins
8.0Excellent
Video & Hybrid
5.5Fair
6.0Good✓ wins
Landscape
2.5Limited
3.5Limited✓ wins
Travel
7.0Good
7.5Good✓ wins
Wildlife
6.5Good
8.0Excellent✓ wins
Vlogging
7.0Good
7.0Good

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

OM-1 II

  • AF low-light limit

    -8 EV vs -7 EV — lower is better

  • Subject recognition

    Adds People, Birds, Animals…

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 134.8, 91.6, 72.7

  • Burst (electronic)

    120 fps vs 15 fps — higher is better

  • ISO max (native)

    102,400 vs 25,600 — higher is better

  • EVF resolution

    5,760,000 vs 2,360,000 — higher is better

  • Card types

    Adds SD UHS-I

  • Burst (mechanical)

    10 fps vs 6 fps — higher is better

Reasons to choose

OM-D E-M5 Mark III

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Human, Animal, Bird…

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 134, 91, 72

  • AA filter

    Only OM-D E-M5 Mark III supports it

  • Card slots

    2 vs 1 — higher is better

  • Headphone jack (3.5mm)

    Only OM-D E-M5 Mark III supports it

  • Battery life (CIPA)

    640 shots vs 520 shots — higher is better

  • Weight

    580 g vs 599 g — lower is better

Both cameras share

  • ResolutionBoth 20.4 MP
  • AF points / zonesBoth 1053
  • AF frame coverageBoth 100 %
  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • Animal / bird AFBoth support animal / bird af
  • Pre-Capture / Pre-ReleaseBoth support pre-capture / pre-release

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

OM-1 II

Pros

  • 120fps stills
  • Stacked MFT
  • IP53 weather sealing
  • Computational features

Cons

  • MFT sensor size
  • Smaller ecosystem
  • Menu complexity

OM-D E-M5 Mark III

Pros

  • Compact pro
  • Weather sealed
  • IBIS

Cons

  • Older
  • MFT
  • Superseded

Full specifications

= category winner

OM-1 II
OM-D E-M5 Mark III
Resolution
20.4 MP
20.4 MP
Sensor type
4/3 Stacked BSI Live MOS
Four Thirds Live MOS
Sensor size
17.4 x 13.0 mm
17.3 × 13.0 mm
AA filter
No
Yes
OM-1 II
OM-D E-M5 Mark III
AF system
1053-point Cross Quad Pixel phase detection AF
Cross-type PDAF
AF points / zones
1053
1053
AF frame coverage
100 %
100 %
AF low-light limit
-8 EV
-7 EV
Eye AF
Yes
Yes
Animal / bird AF
Yes
Yes
Subject recognition
People, Birds, Animals, Motorsports, Airplanes, Trains
Human, Animal, Bird, Vehicle
OM-1 II
OM-D E-M5 Mark III
Burst (mechanical)
10 fps+67%
6 fps
Burst (electronic)
120 fps8× more
15 fps
Pre-Capture / Pre-Release
Yes
Yes
RAW buffer depth
60 frames
OM-1 II
OM-D E-M5 Mark III
Max resolution
4K / C4K
4K UHD
4K max frame rate
60 fps
60 fps
Max video bit rate
150 Mbps
150 Mbps
Internal RAW video
No
No
Log profile
OM-Log / HLG
Standard profiles
Codecs
H.264, H.265, MOV
H.265, H.264
OM-1 II
OM-D E-M5 Mark III
Weight
599 g
580 g−19 g less
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
134.8 × 91.6 × 72.7 mm
134 × 91 × 72 mm
Weather sealing
Yes
Yes

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for wildlife, OM-1 II or OM-D E-M5 Mark III?

OM-D E-M5 Mark III scores 8.0/10 versus 6.5/10 for OM-1 II — Bird AF subject recognition.

What's the resolution difference between the OM-1 II and OM-D E-M5 Mark III?

Both cameras share the same 20.4 MP resolution.

Do the OM-1 II and OM-D E-M5 Mark III have in-body image stabilization?

OM-1 II has 8.5-stop in-body image stabilization, while oM-D E-M5 Mark III has 6-stop in-body image stabilization.

Which shoots faster bursts — the OM-1 II or the OM-D E-M5 Mark III?

OM-1 II reaches 120 fps electronic. OM-D E-M5 Mark III reaches 15 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the OM-1 II and OM-D E-M5 Mark III?

OM-1 II weighs 599 g and OM-D E-M5 Mark III weighs 580 g, so the OM-D E-M5 Mark III is 19 g lighter.

Do the OM-1 II and OM-D E-M5 Mark III record 4K video?

OM-1 II: 4K up to 60p. OM-D E-M5 Mark III: 4K up to 60p.

Are the OM-1 II and OM-D E-M5 Mark III weather sealed?

OM-1 II: Yes. OM-D E-M5 Mark III: Yes.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 520 shots (CIPA) for the OM-1 II and 640 shots for the OM-D E-M5 Mark III, giving the OM-D E-M5 Mark III the edge.

How much does each cost?

OM-1 II launched at $2,399 and OM-D E-M5 Mark III at $1,199. The OM-D E-M5 Mark III is $1,200 less.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed May 2026.