Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg

OM System

OM-D E-M5 Mark III

Compact pro MFT with IBIS and weather sealing.

$1,199

Launch price

Released Oct 2019

vs
Alpha 7R VI

Sony

Alpha 7R VI

66.8MP stacked full-frame high-resolution body with 30fps bursts, 8K 30p, 4K 120p, and Sony's AI processing unit.

$4,499

Launch price

Released Jun 2026

Alpha 7R VI is 6.7 years newer.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Wins

4categories

OM-D E-M5 Mark III

Sports & ActionWildlife

Wins

8categories

Alpha 7R VI

PortraitVideo & Hybrid

2 categories tied

Which would you choose?

TL;DR — Key differences

OM-D E-M5 Mark III wins 0 categories·Alpha 7R VI wins 5 categories
  • BAlpha 7R VI has higher Max video bit rate (600 Mbps vs 150 Mbps)
  • BAlpha 7R VI has higher EVF resolution (9,437,184 vs 2,360,000)
  • BAlpha 7R VI has higher Resolution (66.8 MP vs 20.4 MP)
  • BAlpha 7R VI has higher RAW buffer depth (150 frames vs 60 frames)
  • BAlpha 7R VI has higher Burst (electronic) (30 fps vs 15 fps)

Key specs at a glance

OM-D E-M5 Mark IIIAlpha 7R VI
Resolution20.4 MP66.8 MP
SensorMFTFull Frame
ISO max25,60032,000
Burst15 fps30 fps
4K60 fps120 fps
IBIS6-stopYes
Weight580 g713 g
Battery640 shots600 shots

Size and weight, to scale

OM-D E-M5 Mark III

134 × 91 × 72 mm

580 g (1.28 lb / 20.46 oz)

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

for scale

Alpha 7R VI front view

Alpha 7R VI

133 × 97 × 83 mm

713 g (1.57 lb / 25.15 oz)

OM-D E-M5 Mark III is 6mm shorter and 11mm thinner than Alpha 7R VI but it is also 1mm wider.

OM-D E-M5 Mark III is 133 g lighter than Alpha 7R VI.

Depth (front-to-back): 72mm OM-D E-M5 Mark III · 83mm Alpha 7R VI

Back view, to scale

Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.

OM-D E-M5 Mark III

134 × 91 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

Alpha 7R VI back view

Alpha 7R VI

133 × 97 mm

Top view, to scale

Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.

OM-D E-M5 Mark III

134 × 72 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

Alpha 7R VI top view

Alpha 7R VI

133 × 83 mm

Sensor size, to scale

OM-D E-M5 Mark III

17.3 × 13 mm · Micro Four Thirds

225 mm² area

Alpha 7R VI

35.9 × 24 mm · Full Frame

862 mm² area

3.8× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

OM-D E-M5 Mark III

Micro Four Thirds

130+

native lenses available

60 first-party70 third-party

Alpha 7R VI

✓ more lenses

Sony E

350+

native lenses available

80 first-party270 third-party

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseOM-D E-M5 Mark IIIAlpha 7R VI
Portrait
4.0Fair
8.5Excellent✓ wins
Sports & Action
8.5Excellent✓ wins
7.0Good
Video & Hybrid
6.0Good
8.0Excellent✓ wins
Landscape
3.5Limited
7.5Good✓ wins
Travel
7.5Good✓ wins
5.0Fair
Wildlife
8.0Excellent✓ wins
6.5Good
Vlogging
7.0Good✓ wins
5.5Fair

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

OM-D E-M5 Mark III

  • AF low-light limit

    -7 EV vs -6 EV — lower is better

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 134, 91, 72

  • Card types

    Adds SD UHS-II

  • AA filter

    Only OM-D E-M5 Mark III supports it

  • Pre-Capture / Pre-Release

    Only OM-D E-M5 Mark III supports it

  • Weather sealing

    Only OM-D E-M5 Mark III supports it

  • AF points / zones

    1053 vs 759 — higher is better

  • Weight

    580 g vs 713 g — lower is better

Reasons to choose

Alpha 7R VI

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 132.7, 96.9, 82.9

  • Card types

    Adds CFexpress Type A, SDXC UHS-II

  • Max video bit rate

    600 Mbps vs 150 Mbps — higher is better

  • EVF resolution

    9,437,184 vs 2,360,000 — higher is better

  • Resolution

    66.8 MP vs 20.4 MP — higher is better

  • RAW buffer depth

    150 frames vs 60 frames — higher is better

  • Codecs

    Adds XAVC HS, XAVC S, XAVC S-I

  • Burst (electronic)

    30 fps vs 15 fps — higher is better

Both cameras share

  • ISO min (native)Both 100
  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • Animal / bird AFBoth support animal / bird af
  • In-body stabilization (IBIS)Both support in-body stabilization (ibis)
  • Card slotsBoth 2
  • TouchscreenBoth support touchscreen

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

OM-D E-M5 Mark III

Pros

  • Compact pro
  • Weather sealed
  • IBIS

Cons

  • Older
  • MFT
  • Superseded

Alpha 7R VI

Pros

  • 66.8MP stacked full-frame sensor
  • 30fps blackout-free electronic burst
  • 8K 30p and 4K 120p video
  • 5-axis sensor-shift stabilization
  • 9.44M-dot HDR OLED EVF

Cons

  • Very expensive
  • Large files demand fast cards and storage
  • 8K workflow can be heavy

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the OM-D E-M5 Mark III and Alpha 7R VI at major authorized retailers.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Full specifications

= category winner

OM-D E-M5 Mark III
Alpha 7R VI
Resolution
20.4 MP
66.8 MP3.3× more
Sensor type
Four Thirds Live MOS
Full-Frame Stacked CMOS
Sensor size
17.3 × 13.0 mm
35.9 × 24.0 mm
AA filter
Yes
No
OM-D E-M5 Mark III
Alpha 7R VI
Processor
TruePic X
BIONZ XR with AI processing unit
OM-D E-M5 Mark III
Alpha 7R VI
ISO min (native)
100
100
ISO max (native)
25,600
32,000+0.3 stops
ISO max (expanded)
102,400
102,400
OM-D E-M5 Mark III
Alpha 7R VI
Shutter type
Mechanical + Electronic
Mechanical focal plane shutter + electronic rolling shutter
Max mechanical speed
1/8000 sec
1/8000 sec
Max electronic speed
1/16000 sec

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for portraits, OM-D E-M5 Mark III or Alpha 7R VI?

Alpha 7R VI scores 8.5/10 versus 4.0/10 for OM-D E-M5 Mark III — 66.8MP — excellent for large prints and crops.

What's the resolution difference between the OM-D E-M5 Mark III and Alpha 7R VI?

OM-D E-M5 Mark III is 20.4 MP and Alpha 7R VI is 66.8 MP, so the Alpha 7R VI captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the OM-D E-M5 Mark III and Alpha 7R VI have in-body image stabilization?

OM-D E-M5 Mark III has 6-stop in-body image stabilization, while Alpha 7R VI has in-body image stabilization.

Which shoots faster bursts — the OM-D E-M5 Mark III or the Alpha 7R VI?

OM-D E-M5 Mark III reaches 15 fps electronic. Alpha 7R VI reaches 30 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the OM-D E-M5 Mark III and Alpha 7R VI?

OM-D E-M5 Mark III weighs 580 g and Alpha 7R VI weighs 713 g, so the OM-D E-M5 Mark III is 133 g lighter.

Do the OM-D E-M5 Mark III and Alpha 7R VI record 4K video?

OM-D E-M5 Mark III: 4K up to 60p. Alpha 7R VI: 8K (max), 4K up to 120p.

Are the OM-D E-M5 Mark III and Alpha 7R VI weather sealed?

OM-D E-M5 Mark III: Yes. Alpha 7R VI: No.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 640 shots (CIPA) for the OM-D E-M5 Mark III and 600 shots for the Alpha 7R VI, giving the OM-D E-M5 Mark III the edge.

How much does each cost?

OM-D E-M5 Mark III launched at $1,199 and Alpha 7R VI at $4,499. The OM-D E-M5 Mark III is $3,300 less.

Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.

Add any camera to get a three-way OM-D E-M5 Mark III vs Alpha 7R VI vs X comparison.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed July 2026.

Product images courtesy of OM System and Sony press materials.