Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg

OM System

OM-1 II

Flagship MFT with stacked sensor, 120fps, and pro wildlife features.

$2,399

Launch price

Released Feb 2024

vs
GR IV

Ricoh

GR IV

Latest GR with 25.74MP APS-C sensor, 28mm equivalent lens, 5-axis SR, 53GB internal memory, and pocket street-camera handling.

$1,499

Launch price

Released Jan 2026

GR IV is 1.9 years newer.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Wins

6categories

OM-1 II

Sports & ActionTravel

Wins

3categories

GR IV

PortraitVlogging

2 categories tied

Which would you choose?

TL;DR — Key differences

OM-1 II wins 4 categories·GR IV wins 1 categories
  • AOM-1 II has higher Burst (electronic) (120 fps vs 4 fps)
  • AOM-1 II has higher AF points / zones (1053 vs 49)
  • AOM-1 II has higher 1080p max frame rate (240 fps vs 60 fps)
  • AOM-1 II has higher Burst (mechanical) (10 fps vs 4 fps)
  • BGR IV has lower Weight (262 g vs 599 g)

Key specs at a glance

OM-1 IIGR IV
Resolution20.4 MP25.74 MP
SensorMFTAPS-C
ISO max102,400204,800
Burst120 fps4 fps
4K60 fps60 fps
IBIS8.5-stopYes
Weight599 g262 g
Battery520 shots250 shots

Size and weight, to scale

OM-1 II

135 × 92 × 73 mm

599 g (1.32 lb / 21.13 oz)

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

for scale

GR IV front view

GR IV

109 × 61 × 33 mm

262 g (0.58 lb / 9.24 oz)

OM-1 II is 25mm wider, 30mm taller, and 40mm thicker than GR IV.

OM-1 II is 337 g heavier than GR IV.

Depth (front-to-back): 73mm OM-1 II · 33mm GR IV

Back view, to scale

Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.

OM-1 II

135 × 92 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

GR IV back view

GR IV

109 × 61 mm

Top view, to scale

Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.

OM-1 II

135 × 73 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

GR IV top view

GR IV

109 × 33 mm

Sensor size, to scale

OM-1 II

17.4 × 13 mm · Compact / large-type

226 mm² area

GR IV

23.3 × 15.5 mm · APS-C

361 mm² area

1.6× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

OM-1 II

✓ more lenses

Micro Four Thirds

130+

native lenses available

60 first-party70 third-party

GR IV: mount data unavailable

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseOM-1 IIGR IV
Portrait
4.0Fair
6.5Good✓ wins
Sports & Action
10.0Excellent✓ wins
1.5Limited
Video & Hybrid
5.5Fair✓ wins
3.5Limited
Landscape
2.5Limited
2.5Limited
Travel
7.0Good✓ wins
5.5Fair
Wildlife
6.5Good✓ wins
1.0Limited
Vlogging
7.0Good✓ wins
6.5Good

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

OM-1 II

  • Subject recognition

    Adds People, Birds, Animals…

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 134.8, 91.6, 72.7

  • Card types

    Adds SD UHS-II, SD UHS-I

  • Burst (electronic)

    120 fps vs 4 fps — higher is better

  • AF points / zones

    1053 vs 49 — higher is better

  • 1080p max frame rate

    240 fps vs 60 fps — higher is better

  • Codecs

    Adds H.264, H.265

  • Burst (mechanical)

    10 fps vs 4 fps — higher is better

Reasons to choose

GR IV

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Face, Eye

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 109.4, 61.1, 32.7

  • Card types

    Adds microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC UHS-I

  • Weight

    262 g vs 599 g — lower is better

  • ISO max (native)

    204,800 vs 102,400 — higher is better

  • Codecs

    Adds MPEG-4 AVC/H.264

  • Resolution

    25.74 MP vs 20.4 MP — higher is better

Both cameras share

  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • 4K max frame rateBoth 60 fps
  • In-body stabilization (IBIS)Both support in-body stabilization (ibis)
  • Card slotsBoth 1
  • TouchscreenBoth support touchscreen
  • Wi-FiBoth support wi-fi

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

OM-1 II

Pros

  • 120fps stills
  • Stacked MFT
  • IP53 weather sealing
  • Computational features

Cons

  • MFT sensor size
  • Smaller ecosystem
  • Menu complexity

GR IV

Pros

  • 25.74MP APS-C sensor
  • 5-axis sensor-shift SR
  • 53GB internal memory
  • Pocketable 28mm GR lens

Cons

  • Fixed lens
  • No built-in EVF
  • Full HD video only

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the OM-1 II and GR IV at major authorized retailers.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Full specifications

= category winner

OM-1 II
GR IV
Resolution
20.4 MP
25.74 MP+26%
Sensor type
4/3 Stacked BSI Live MOS
APS-C CMOS
Sensor size
17.4 x 13.0 mm
23.3 x 15.5 mm
AA filter
No
No
OM-1 II
GR IV
Aperture
F2.8-F16
Focal length (35mm equiv.)
28 mm
OM-1 II
GR IV
Processor
TruePic X
GR ENGINE 7
OM-1 II
GR IV
ISO min (native)
80−20 less
100
ISO max (native)
102,400
204,800+1 stop
ISO max (expanded)
102,400
204,800
OM-1 II
GR IV
Shutter type
Computerised focal-plane shutter + electronic shutter
Leaf shutter
Max mechanical speed
1/8000 sec
1/4000 sec
Max electronic speed
1/32000 sec

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for sports, OM-1 II or GR IV?

OM-1 II scores 10.0/10 versus 1.5/10 for GR IV — 120fps burst — pro-level action capture.

What's the resolution difference between the OM-1 II and GR IV?

OM-1 II is 20.4 MP and GR IV is 25.74 MP, so the GR IV captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the OM-1 II and GR IV have in-body image stabilization?

OM-1 II has 8.5-stop in-body image stabilization, while GR IV has in-body image stabilization.

Which shoots faster bursts — the OM-1 II or the GR IV?

OM-1 II reaches 120 fps electronic. GR IV reaches 4 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the OM-1 II and GR IV?

OM-1 II weighs 599 g and GR IV weighs 262 g, so the GR IV is 337 g lighter.

Do the OM-1 II and GR IV record 4K video?

OM-1 II: 4K up to 60p. GR IV: 4K up to 60p.

Are the OM-1 II and GR IV weather sealed?

OM-1 II: Yes. GR IV: No.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 520 shots (CIPA) for the OM-1 II and 250 shots for the GR IV, giving the OM-1 II the edge.

How much does each cost?

OM-1 II launched at $2,399 and GR IV at $1,499. The GR IV is $900 less.

Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.

Add any camera to get a three-way OM-1 II vs GR IV vs X comparison.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed July 2026.

Product images courtesy of OM System and Ricoh press materials.