Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg

OM System

OM-1 II

Flagship MFT with stacked sensor, 120fps, and pro wildlife features.

$2,399

Launch price

Released Feb 2024

vs
fp L

Sigma

fp L

World's smallest full-frame interchangeable camera with 61MP and L-mount.

$2,499

Launch price

Released Jul 2021

OM-1 II is 2.6 years newer.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Wins

12categories

OM-1 II

Sports & ActionTravel

Wins

2categories

fp L

WildlifePortrait

4 categories tied

Which would you choose?

TL;DR — Key differences

OM-1 II wins 4 categories·fp L wins 1 categories
  • AOM-1 II has higher AF points / zones (1053 vs 49)
  • AOM-1 II has higher Burst (electronic) (120 fps vs 10 fps)
  • AOM-1 II has higher ISO max (native) (102,400 vs 25,600)
  • Bfp L has higher Resolution (61 MP vs 20.4 MP)
  • AOM-1 II has higher EVF resolution (5,760,000 vs 2,360,000)

Key specs at a glance

OM-1 IIfp L
Resolution20.4 MP61 MP
SensorMFTFull Frame
ISO max102,40025,600
Burst120 fps10 fps
4K60 fps29.97 fps
IBIS8.5-stopNo
Weight599 g427 g
Battery520 shots240 shots

Size and weight, to scale

OM-1 II

135 × 92 × 73 mm

599 g (1.32 lb / 21.13 oz)

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

for scale

fp L front view

fp L

113 × 70 × 45 mm

427 g (0.94 lb / 15.06 oz)

OM-1 II is 22mm wider, 22mm taller, and 27mm thicker than fp L.

OM-1 II is 172 g heavier than fp L.

Depth (front-to-back): 73mm OM-1 II · 45mm fp L

Back view, to scale

Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.

OM-1 II

135 × 92 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

fp L back view

fp L

113 × 70 mm

Top view, to scale

Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.

OM-1 II

135 × 73 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

fp L top view

fp L

113 × 45 mm

Sensor size, to scale

OM-1 II

17.4 × 13 mm · Compact / large-type

226 mm² area

fp L

36 × 24 mm · Full Frame

864 mm² area

3.8× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

OM-1 II

✓ more lenses

Micro Four Thirds

130+

native lenses available

60 first-party70 third-party

fp L: mount data unavailable

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseOM-1 IIfp L
Portrait
4.0Fair
7.5Good✓ wins
Sports & Action
10.0Excellent✓ wins
6.5Good
Video & Hybrid
5.5Fair✓ wins
3.5Limited
Landscape
2.5Limited
7.0Good✓ wins
Travel
7.0Good✓ wins
5.0Fair
Wildlife
6.5Good
8.0Excellent✓ wins
Vlogging
7.0Good✓ wins
4.5Fair

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

OM-1 II

  • AF low-light limit

    -8 EV vs -5 EV — lower is better

  • Subject recognition

    Adds People, Birds, Animals…

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 134.8, 91.6, 72.7

  • Card types

    Adds SD UHS-II, SD UHS-I

  • AF points / zones

    1053 vs 49 — higher is better

  • Burst (electronic)

    120 fps vs 10 fps — higher is better

  • ISO max (native)

    102,400 vs 25,600 — higher is better

  • EVF resolution

    5,760,000 vs 2,360,000 — higher is better

Reasons to choose

fp L

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Human, Animal, Bird…

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 112.6, 69.9, 45.3

  • Card types

    Adds SD, SDHC, SDXC

  • Resolution

    61 MP vs 20.4 MP — higher is better

  • AA filter

    Only fp L supports it

  • Internal RAW video

    Only fp L supports it

  • Headphone jack (3.5mm)

    Only fp L supports it

  • Codecs

    Adds CinemaDNG

Both cameras share

  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • Animal / bird AFBoth support animal / bird af
  • Pre-Capture / Pre-ReleaseBoth support pre-capture / pre-release
  • Max video bit rateBoth 150 Mbps
  • Weather sealingBoth support weather sealing
  • Card slotsBoth 1

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

OM-1 II

Pros

  • 120fps stills
  • Stacked MFT
  • IP53 weather sealing
  • Computational features

Cons

  • MFT sensor size
  • Smaller ecosystem
  • Menu complexity

fp L

Pros

  • Tiny full-frame
  • 61MP
  • L-mount
  • Unique industrial design

Cons

  • No IBIS
  • Small battery
  • Minimal ergonomics

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the OM-1 II and fp L at major authorized retailers.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Full specifications

= category winner

OM-1 II
fp L
Resolution
20.4 MP
61 MP3× more
Sensor type
4/3 Stacked BSI Live MOS
BSI CMOS
Sensor size
17.4 x 13.0 mm
36 x 24
AA filter
No
Yes
OM-1 II
fp L
Processor
TruePic X
Image processor
OM-1 II
fp L
ISO min (native)
80−20 less
100
ISO max (native)
102,400+2 stops
25,600
ISO max (expanded)
102,400
102,400
OM-1 II
fp L
Shutter type
Computerised focal-plane shutter + electronic shutter
Electronic Rolling Shutter
Max mechanical speed
1/8000 sec
1/8000 sec
Max electronic speed
1/32000 sec
1/8000

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for landscape, OM-1 II or fp L?

fp L scores 7.0/10 versus 2.5/10 for OM-1 II — 61MP — massive detail for large prints.

What's the resolution difference between the OM-1 II and fp L?

OM-1 II is 20.4 MP and fp L is 61 MP, so the fp L captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the OM-1 II and fp L have in-body image stabilization?

OM-1 II has 8.5-stop in-body image stabilization, while fp L does not have IBIS.

Which shoots faster bursts — the OM-1 II or the fp L?

OM-1 II reaches 120 fps electronic. fp L reaches 10 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the OM-1 II and fp L?

OM-1 II weighs 599 g and fp L weighs 427 g, so the fp L is 172 g lighter.

Do the OM-1 II and fp L record 4K video?

OM-1 II: 4K up to 60p. fp L: 4K up to 29.97p.

Are the OM-1 II and fp L weather sealed?

OM-1 II: Yes. fp L: Yes.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 520 shots (CIPA) for the OM-1 II and 240 shots for the fp L, giving the OM-1 II the edge.

How much does each cost?

OM-1 II launched at $2,399 and fp L at $2,499. The OM-1 II is $100 less.

Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.

Add any camera to get a three-way OM-1 II vs fp L vs X comparison.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed July 2026.

Product images courtesy of OM System and Sigma press materials.