Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg Compare
EOS R6 Mark II

Canon

EOS R6 Mark II

Versatile 24.2MP full-frame hybrid with class-leading AF and 4K 60p video.

$2,499

Released Nov 2022

vs

Sigma

fp L

World's smallest full-frame interchangeable camera with 61MP and L-mount.

$2,499

Released Jul 2021

EOS R6 Mark II is 1.4 years newer.

Wins

12categories

EOS R6 Mark II

PortraitSports & Action

Wins

2categories

fp L

LandscapePortrait

4 categories tied

TL;DR — Key differences

EOS R6 Mark II wins 4 categories·fp L wins 1 categories
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher AF points / zones (1053 vs 49)
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher ISO max (native) (102,400 vs 25,600)
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher RAW buffer depth (180 frames vs 60 frames)
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher Burst (electronic) (40 fps vs 15 fps)
  • Bfp L has higher Resolution (61 MP vs 24.2 MP)

Key specs at a glance

EOS R6 Mark IIfp L
Resolution24.2 MP61 MP
SensorFull FrameFull Frame
ISO max102,40025,600
Burst40 fps15 fps
4K60 fps60 fps
IBIS8-stop6-stop
Weight680 g720 g
Battery760 shots640 shots

Size and weight, to scale

EOS R6 Mark II front view

EOS R6 Mark II

138 × 98 × 88 mm

680 g (1.50 lb / 23.99 oz)

fp L

138 × 98 × 88 mm

720 g (1.59 lb / 25.40 oz)

EOS R6 Mark II and fp L share virtually identical body dimensions.

EOS R6 Mark II is 40 g lighter than fp L.

Depth (front-to-back): 88mm EOS R6 Mark II · 88mm fp L

Back view, to scale

Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.

EOS R6 Mark II back view

EOS R6 Mark II

138 × 98 mm

fp L

138 × 98 mm

Top view, to scale

Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.

EOS R6 Mark II top view

EOS R6 Mark II

138 × 88 mm

fp L

138 × 88 mm

Sensor size, to scale

EOS R6 Mark II

35.9 × 23.9 mm · Full Frame

858 mm² area

fp L

36 × 24 mm · Full Frame

864 mm² area

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

EOS R6 Mark II

✓ more lenses

Canon RF

105+

native lenses available

45 first-party60 third-party

fp L: mount data unavailable

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseEOS R6 Mark IIfp L
Portrait
8.5Excellent
8.5Excellent
Sports & Action
8.5Excellent✓ wins
6.0Good
Video & Hybrid
7.5Good✓ wins
6.0Good
Landscape
7.0Good
9.0Excellent✓ wins
Travel
7.5Good✓ wins
6.5Good
Wildlife
6.5Good
8.0Excellent✓ wins
Vlogging
8.0Excellent✓ wins
5.5Fair

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

EOS R6 Mark II

  • AF low-light limit

    -6.5 EV vs -5 EV — lower is better

  • Subject recognition

    Adds People, Dogs, Cats…

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 138.4, 98.4, 88.4

  • AF points / zones

    1053 vs 49 — higher is better

  • ISO max (native)

    102,400 vs 25,600 — higher is better

  • RAW buffer depth

    180 frames vs 60 frames — higher is better

  • Burst (electronic)

    40 fps vs 15 fps — higher is better

  • Max video bit rate

    340 Mbps vs 150 Mbps — higher is better

Reasons to choose

fp L

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Human, Animal, Bird…

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 138, 98, 88

  • Resolution

    61 MP vs 24.2 MP — higher is better

  • EVF magnification

    0.78 × vs 0.76 × — higher is better

Both cameras share

  • AA filterBoth support aa filter
  • ISO min (native)Both 100
  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • Animal / bird AFBoth support animal / bird af
  • Pre-Capture / Pre-ReleaseBoth support pre-capture / pre-release
  • 4K max frame rateBoth 60 fps

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

EOS R6 Mark II

Pros

  • Up to 40fps electronic burst
  • 4K 60p oversampled from 6K
  • Dual Pixel CMOS AF II — superb subject tracking
  • 8-stop IBIS
  • Fully articulating touchscreen

Cons

  • 24.2MP may feel limiting for large prints
  • No CFexpress on base body
  • Short battery life vs. A7 IV

fp L

Pros

  • Tiny full-frame
  • 61MP
  • L-mount
  • Unique industrial design

Cons

  • No IBIS
  • Small battery
  • Minimal ergonomics

Full specifications

= category winner

EOS R6 Mark II
fp L
Resolution
24.2 MP
61 MP2.5× more
Sensor type
Full Frame CMOS
Full Frame CMOS
Sensor size
35.9 × 23.9 mm
36.0 × 24.0 mm
AA filter
Yes
Yes
EOS R6 Mark II
fp L
AF system
Dual Pixel CMOS AF II
Phase-detect AF
AF points / zones
105321.5× more
49
AF frame coverage
100 %+11%
90 %
AF low-light limit
-6.5 EV
-5 EV
Eye AF
Yes
Yes
Animal / bird AF
Yes
Yes
Subject recognition
People, Dogs, Cats, Birds, Horses, Cars, Motorbikes, Aircraft, Trains
Human, Animal, Bird, Vehicle
EOS R6 Mark II
fp L
Burst (mechanical)
12 fps2× more
6 fps
Burst (electronic)
40 fps2.7× more
15 fps
Pre-Capture / Pre-Release
Yes
Yes
RAW buffer depth
180 frames3× more
60 frames
EOS R6 Mark II
fp L
Max resolution
4K UHD
4K UHD
4K max frame rate
60 fps
60 fps
Max video bit rate
340 Mbps2.3× more
150 Mbps
Internal RAW video
Yes
No
Log profile
Canon Log 3 / HDR PQ
Standard profiles
Codecs
H.265, H.264
H.265, H.264
EOS R6 Mark II
fp L
Weight
680 g−40 g less
720 g
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
138.4 × 98.4 × 88.4 mm
138 × 98 × 88 mm
Weather sealing
Yes
Yes

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for sports, EOS R6 Mark II or fp L?

EOS R6 Mark II scores 8.5/10 versus 6.0/10 for fp L — 40fps burst — pro-level action capture.

What's the resolution difference between the EOS R6 Mark II and fp L?

EOS R6 Mark II is 24.2 MP and fp L is 61 MP, so the fp L captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the EOS R6 Mark II and fp L have in-body image stabilization?

EOS R6 Mark II has 8-stop in-body image stabilization, while fp L has 6-stop in-body image stabilization.

Which shoots faster bursts — the EOS R6 Mark II or the fp L?

EOS R6 Mark II reaches 40 fps electronic. fp L reaches 15 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the EOS R6 Mark II and fp L?

EOS R6 Mark II weighs 680 g and fp L weighs 720 g, so the EOS R6 Mark II is 40 g lighter.

Do the EOS R6 Mark II and fp L record 4K video?

EOS R6 Mark II: 4K up to 60p. fp L: 4K up to 60p.

Are the EOS R6 Mark II and fp L weather sealed?

EOS R6 Mark II: Yes. fp L: Yes.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 760 shots (CIPA) for the EOS R6 Mark II and 640 shots for the fp L, giving the EOS R6 Mark II the edge.

How much does each cost?

Both launched at $2,499.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed May 2026.

Product images courtesy of Canon and Sigma press materials.