Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg

OM System

OM-5 Mark II

Updated compact MFT travel body with 20MP sensor, 7.5-stop IBIS, IP53 sealing, and Live ND.

$1,299

Launch price

Released Jan 2025

vs
Alpha 7 V

Sony

Alpha 7 V

33MP partially stacked Exmor RS hybrid with BIONZ XR2 AI, 30fps blackout-free burst, 7.5-stop IBIS, and 4K 60p oversampled from 7K.

$2,899

Launch price

Released Dec 2025

Alpha 7 V is 10 months newer.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Wins

5categories

OM-5 Mark II

Sports & ActionTravel

Wins

8categories

Alpha 7 V

WildlifeSports & Action

5 categories tied

Which would you choose?

TL;DR — Key differences

OM-5 Mark II wins 1 categories·Alpha 7 V wins 4 categories
  • BAlpha 7 V has higher Max video bit rate (600 Mbps vs 150 Mbps)
  • BAlpha 7 V has higher ISO max (native) (51,200 vs 25,600)
  • BAlpha 7 V has higher Burst (electronic) (30 fps vs 15 fps)
  • BAlpha 7 V has higher 4K max frame rate (120 fps vs 60 fps)
  • AOM-5 Mark II has lower Weight (414 g vs 695 g)

Key specs at a glance

OM-5 Mark IIAlpha 7 V
Resolution20.4 MP33 MP
SensorMFTFull Frame
ISO max25,60051,200
Burst15 fps30 fps
4K60 fps120 fps
IBIS7.5-stop7.5-stop
Weight414 g695 g
Battery640 shots630 shots

Size and weight, to scale

OM-5 Mark II

125 × 85 × 50 mm

414 g (0.91 lb / 14.60 oz)

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

for scale

Alpha 7 V front view

Alpha 7 V

130 × 96 × 82 mm

695 g (1.53 lb / 24.52 oz)

OM-5 Mark II is 5mm narrower, 11mm shorter, and 33mm thinner than Alpha 7 V.

OM-5 Mark II is 281 g lighter than Alpha 7 V.

Depth (front-to-back): 50mm OM-5 Mark II · 82mm Alpha 7 V

Back view, to scale

Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.

OM-5 Mark II

125 × 85 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

Alpha 7 V back view

Alpha 7 V

130 × 96 mm

Top view, to scale

Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.

OM-5 Mark II

125 × 50 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

Alpha 7 V top view

Alpha 7 V

130 × 82 mm

Sensor size, to scale

OM-5 Mark II

17.3 × 13 mm · Micro Four Thirds

225 mm² area

Alpha 7 V

35.9 × 23.9 mm · Full Frame

858 mm² area

3.8× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

OM-5 Mark II

Micro Four Thirds

130+

native lenses available

60 first-party70 third-party

Alpha 7 V

✓ more lenses

Sony E

350+

native lenses available

80 first-party270 third-party

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseOM-5 Mark IIAlpha 7 V
Portrait
4.0Fair
8.0Excellent✓ wins
Sports & Action
8.5Excellent
9.5Excellent✓ wins
Video & Hybrid
6.0Good
8.0Excellent✓ wins
Landscape
3.5Limited
7.5Good✓ wins
Travel
8.0Excellent✓ wins
7.5Good
Wildlife
8.0Excellent
10.0Excellent✓ wins
Vlogging
7.5Good✓ wins
5.5Fair

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

OM-5 Mark II

  • AF low-light limit

    -7 EV vs -4 EV — lower is better

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 125.3, 85.2, 49.7

  • Weight

    414 g vs 695 g — lower is better

  • AF points / zones

    1053 vs 759 — higher is better

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Vehicle

  • AF frame coverage

    100 % vs 94 % — higher is better

  • Battery life (CIPA)

    640 shots vs 630 shots — higher is better

Reasons to choose

Alpha 7 V

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 130.3, 96.4, 82.4

  • Max video bit rate

    600 Mbps vs 150 Mbps — higher is better

  • Codecs

    Adds XAVC HS, XAVC S, XAVC S-I

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Insect, Car, Train…

  • AA filter

    Only Alpha 7 V supports it

  • ISO max (native)

    51,200 vs 25,600 — higher is better

  • Burst (electronic)

    30 fps vs 15 fps — higher is better

  • 4K max frame rate

    120 fps vs 60 fps — higher is better

Both cameras share

  • ISO min (native)Both 100
  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • Animal / bird AFBoth support animal / bird af
  • Pre-Capture / Pre-ReleaseBoth support pre-capture / pre-release
  • In-body stabilization (IBIS)Both support in-body stabilization (ibis)
  • IBIS effectivenessBoth 7.5 stops

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

OM-5 Mark II

Pros

  • 7.5-stop IBIS
  • IP53 weather sealing
  • Live ND & computational modes
  • Compact travel body

Cons

  • MFT sensor
  • Single card slot
  • Premium for MFT

Alpha 7 V

Pros

  • 33MP partially stacked sensor — ~4.5× faster readout than α7 IV
  • Blackout-free 30 fps with full AF/AE (electronic shutter)
  • 7.5-stop central / 6.5-stop peripheral IBIS (CIPA 2024)
  • 759-point phase-detect AF down to EV -4 with AI subject recognition
  • 7K oversampled 4K 60p (full-frame, no pixel binning) + 4K 120p
  • Pre-Capture and dual USB-C (10 Gbps + USB 2.0)
  • Up to 16 stops dynamic range

Cons

  • Premium price vs α7 IV
  • 4K 120p typically requires APS-C / Super 35 crop
  • Heavier than α7 IV (695 g vs 659 g with battery)
  • Complex menu and feature set

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the OM-5 Mark II and Alpha 7 V at major authorized retailers.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Full specifications

= category winner

OM-5 Mark II
Alpha 7 V
Resolution
20.4 MP
33 MP+62%
Sensor type
Four Thirds Live MOS
Full Frame Exmor RS CMOS (partially stacked)
Sensor size
17.3 × 13.0 mm
35.9 × 23.9 mm
AA filter
No
Yes
OM-5 Mark II
Alpha 7 V
Processor
TruePic X
BIONZ XR2 + AI processing unit
OM-5 Mark II
Alpha 7 V
ISO min (native)
100
100
ISO max (native)
25,600
51,200+1 stop
ISO max (expanded)
102,400
204,800
OM-5 Mark II
Alpha 7 V
Shutter type
Mechanical + Electronic
Mechanical + Electronic
Max mechanical speed
1/8000 sec
1/8000 sec
Max electronic speed
1/16000 sec
1/16000 sec

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for portraits, OM-5 Mark II or Alpha 7 V?

Alpha 7 V scores 8.0/10 versus 4.0/10 for OM-5 Mark II — 33MP — ample resolution for portraits.

What's the resolution difference between the OM-5 Mark II and Alpha 7 V?

OM-5 Mark II is 20.4 MP and Alpha 7 V is 33 MP, so the Alpha 7 V captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the OM-5 Mark II and Alpha 7 V have in-body image stabilization?

OM-5 Mark II has 7.5-stop in-body image stabilization, while Alpha 7 V has 7.5-stop in-body image stabilization.

Which shoots faster bursts — the OM-5 Mark II or the Alpha 7 V?

OM-5 Mark II reaches 15 fps electronic. Alpha 7 V reaches 30 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the OM-5 Mark II and Alpha 7 V?

OM-5 Mark II weighs 414 g and Alpha 7 V weighs 695 g, so the OM-5 Mark II is 281 g lighter.

Do the OM-5 Mark II and Alpha 7 V record 4K video?

OM-5 Mark II: 4K up to 60p. Alpha 7 V: 4K up to 120p.

Are the OM-5 Mark II and Alpha 7 V weather sealed?

OM-5 Mark II: Yes. Alpha 7 V: Yes.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 640 shots (CIPA) for the OM-5 Mark II and 630 shots for the Alpha 7 V, giving the OM-5 Mark II the edge.

How much does each cost?

OM-5 Mark II launched at $1,299 and Alpha 7 V at $2,899. The OM-5 Mark II is $1,600 less.

Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.

Add any camera to get a three-way OM-5 Mark II vs Alpha 7 V vs X comparison.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed June 2026.

Product images courtesy of OM System and Sony press materials.