Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg

OM System

OM-1 II

Flagship MFT with stacked sensor, 120fps, and pro wildlife features.

$2,399

Launch price

Released Feb 2024

vs
OM-5 Mark II

OM System

OM-5 Mark II

Updated compact MFT travel body with 20MP sensor, 7.5-stop IBIS, IP53 sealing, and Live ND.

$1,299

Launch price

Released Jan 2025

OM-5 Mark II is 1 year newer.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Wins

11categories

OM-1 II

Sports & ActionTravel

Wins

3categories

OM-5 Mark II

WildlifeSports & Action

4 categories tied

Which would you choose?

TL;DR — Key differences

OM-1 II wins 5 categories·OM-5 Mark II wins 0 categories
  • AOM-1 II has higher AF points / zones (1053 vs 121)
  • AOM-1 II has higher ISO max (native) (102,400 vs 25,600)
  • AOM-1 II has higher Burst (electronic) (120 fps vs 30 fps)
  • AOM-1 II has lower ISO min (native) (80 vs 200)
  • AOM-1 II has higher EVF resolution (5,760,000 vs 2,360,000)

Key specs at a glance

OM-1 IIOM-5 Mark II
Resolution20.4 MP20.4 MP
SensorMFTMFT
ISO max102,40025,600
Burst120 fps30 fps
4K60 fps30 fps
IBIS8.5-stop7.5-stop
Weight599 g414 g
Battery520 shots310 shots

Size and weight, to scale

OM-1 II

135 × 92 × 73 mm

599 g (1.32 lb / 21.13 oz)

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

for scale

OM-5 Mark II front view

OM-5 Mark II

125 × 85 × 50 mm

414 g (0.91 lb / 14.60 oz)

OM-1 II is 10mm wider, 6mm taller, and 23mm thicker than OM-5 Mark II.

OM-1 II is 185 g heavier than OM-5 Mark II.

Depth (front-to-back): 73mm OM-1 II · 50mm OM-5 Mark II

Back view, to scale

Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.

OM-1 II

135 × 92 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

OM-5 Mark II back view

OM-5 Mark II

125 × 85 mm

Top view, to scale

Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.

OM-1 II

135 × 73 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

OM-5 Mark II top view

OM-5 Mark II

125 × 50 mm

Sensor size, to scale

OM-1 II

17.4 × 13 mm · Compact / large-type

226 mm² area

OM-5 Mark II

17.4 × 13 mm · Compact / large-type

226 mm² area

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

OM-1 II

✓ more lenses

Micro Four Thirds

130+

native lenses available

60 first-party70 third-party

OM-5 Mark II

✓ more lenses

Micro Four Thirds

130+

native lenses available

60 first-party70 third-party

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseOM-1 IIOM-5 Mark II
Portrait
4.0Fair
4.0Fair
Sports & Action
10.0Excellent✓ wins
8.0Excellent
Video & Hybrid
5.5Fair✓ wins
3.5Limited
Landscape
2.5Limited
2.5Limited
Travel
7.0Good
7.0Good
Wildlife
6.5Good
9.0Excellent✓ wins
Vlogging
7.0Good✓ wins
6.5Good

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

OM-1 II

  • AF low-light limit

    -8 EV vs -7 EV — lower is better

  • Subject recognition

    Adds People, Birds, Animals…

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 134.8, 91.6, 72.7

  • Card types

    Adds SD UHS-II, SD UHS-I

  • AF points / zones

    1053 vs 121 — higher is better

  • ISO max (native)

    102,400 vs 25,600 — higher is better

  • Burst (electronic)

    120 fps vs 30 fps — higher is better

  • Codecs

    Adds H.265, MOV

Reasons to choose

OM-5 Mark II

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Human, Animal, Bird…

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 125.3, 85.2, 49.7

  • Card types

    Adds SD, SDHC, SDXC

  • Codecs

    Adds MPEG-4 AVC

  • Headphone jack (3.5mm)

    Only OM-5 Mark II supports it

  • EVF magnification

    1.48 × vs 0.78 × — higher is better

  • Max video bit rate

    240 Mbps vs 150 Mbps — higher is better

  • Weight

    414 g vs 599 g — lower is better

Both cameras share

  • ResolutionBoth 20.4 MP
  • AF frame coverageBoth 100 %
  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • Animal / bird AFBoth support animal / bird af
  • Pre-Capture / Pre-ReleaseBoth support pre-capture / pre-release
  • In-body stabilization (IBIS)Both support in-body stabilization (ibis)

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

OM-1 II

Pros

  • 120fps stills
  • Stacked MFT
  • IP53 weather sealing
  • Computational features

Cons

  • MFT sensor size
  • Smaller ecosystem
  • Menu complexity

OM-5 Mark II

Pros

  • 7.5-stop IBIS
  • IP53 weather sealing
  • Live ND & computational modes
  • Compact travel body

Cons

  • MFT sensor
  • Single card slot
  • Premium for MFT

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the OM-1 II and OM-5 Mark II at major authorized retailers.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Full specifications

= category winner

OM-1 II
OM-5 Mark II
Resolution
20.4 MP
20.4 MP
Sensor type
4/3 Stacked BSI Live MOS
CMOS
Sensor size
17.4 x 13.0 mm
17.4 x 13 mm
AA filter
No
No
OM-1 II
OM-5 Mark II
Processor
TruePic X
TruePic X
OM-1 II
OM-5 Mark II
ISO min (native)
80−120 less
200
ISO max (native)
102,400+2 stops
25,600
ISO max (expanded)
102,400
102,400
OM-1 II
OM-5 Mark II
Shutter type
Computerised focal-plane shutter + electronic shutter
Mechanical Focal Plane Shutter and Electronic Rolling Shutter
Max mechanical speed
1/8000 sec
1/8000
Max electronic speed
1/32000 sec
1/32000

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for wildlife, OM-1 II or OM-5 Mark II?

OM-5 Mark II scores 9.0/10 versus 6.5/10 for OM-1 II — 30fps burst captures fleeting moments.

What's the resolution difference between the OM-1 II and OM-5 Mark II?

Both cameras share the same 20.4 MP resolution.

Do the OM-1 II and OM-5 Mark II have in-body image stabilization?

OM-1 II has 8.5-stop in-body image stabilization, while OM-5 Mark II has 7.5-stop in-body image stabilization.

Which shoots faster bursts — the OM-1 II or the OM-5 Mark II?

OM-1 II reaches 120 fps electronic. OM-5 Mark II reaches 30 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the OM-1 II and OM-5 Mark II?

OM-1 II weighs 599 g and OM-5 Mark II weighs 414 g, so the OM-5 Mark II is 185 g lighter.

Do the OM-1 II and OM-5 Mark II record 4K video?

OM-1 II: 4K up to 60p. OM-5 Mark II: 4K up to 30p.

Are the OM-1 II and OM-5 Mark II weather sealed?

OM-1 II: Yes. OM-5 Mark II: Yes.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 520 shots (CIPA) for the OM-1 II and 310 shots for the OM-5 Mark II, giving the OM-1 II the edge.

How much does each cost?

OM-1 II launched at $2,399 and OM-5 Mark II at $1,299. The OM-5 Mark II is $1,100 less.

Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.

Add any camera to get a three-way OM-1 II vs OM-5 Mark II vs X comparison.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed July 2026.

Product images courtesy of OM System press materials.