Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg
OM-5 Mark II

OM System

OM-5 Mark II

Updated compact MFT travel body with 20MP sensor, 7.5-stop IBIS, IP53 sealing, and Live ND.

$1,299

Launch price

Released Jan 2025

vs
OM-D E-M10 Mark IV

OM System

OM-D E-M10 Mark IV

Entry MFT body with IBIS and approachable controls.

$699

Launch price

Released Aug 2020

OM-5 Mark II is 4.4 years newer.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Wins

8categories

OM-5 Mark II

WildlifeSports & Action

Wins

3categories

OM-D E-M10 Mark IV

6 categories tied

Which would you choose?

TL;DR — Key differences

OM-5 Mark II wins 4 categories·OM-D E-M10 Mark IV wins 1 categories
  • BOM-D E-M10 Mark IV has higher Burst (mechanical) (15 fps vs 6 fps)
  • AOM-5 Mark II has higher Max video bit rate (240 Mbps vs 102 Mbps)
  • AOM-5 Mark II has higher EVF magnification (1.48 × vs 0.67 ×)
  • AOM-5 Mark II has higher 1080p max frame rate (120 fps vs 59.94 fps)
  • AOM-5 Mark II has higher Burst (electronic) (30 fps vs 15 fps)

Key specs at a glance

OM-5 Mark IIOM-D E-M10 Mark IV
Resolution20.4 MP20.3 MP
SensorMFTMFT
ISO max25,60025,600
Burst30 fps15 fps
4K30 fps29.97 fps
IBIS7.5-stop4.5-stop
Weight414 g383 g
Battery310 shots360 shots

Size and weight, to scale

OM-5 Mark II front view

OM-5 Mark II

125 × 85 × 50 mm

414 g (0.91 lb / 14.60 oz)

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

for scale

OM-D E-M10 Mark IV front view

OM-D E-M10 Mark IV

122 × 84 × 49 mm

383 g (0.84 lb / 13.51 oz)

OM-5 Mark II is 4mm wider, 1mm taller, and 1mm thicker than OM-D E-M10 Mark IV.

OM-5 Mark II is 31 g heavier than OM-D E-M10 Mark IV.

Depth (front-to-back): 50mm OM-5 Mark II · 49mm OM-D E-M10 Mark IV

Back view, to scale

Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.

OM-5 Mark II back view

OM-5 Mark II

125 × 85 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

OM-D E-M10 Mark IV back view

OM-D E-M10 Mark IV

122 × 84 mm

Top view, to scale

Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.

OM-5 Mark II top view

OM-5 Mark II

125 × 50 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

OM-D E-M10 Mark IV top view

OM-D E-M10 Mark IV

122 × 49 mm

Sensor size, to scale

OM-5 Mark II

17.4 × 13 mm · Compact / large-type

226 mm² area

OM-D E-M10 Mark IV

17.4 × 13 mm · Compact / large-type

226 mm² area

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

OM-5 Mark II

✓ more lenses

Micro Four Thirds

130+

native lenses available

60 first-party70 third-party

OM-D E-M10 Mark IV

✓ more lenses

Micro Four Thirds

130+

native lenses available

60 first-party70 third-party

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseOM-5 Mark IIOM-D E-M10 Mark IV
Portrait
4.0Fair
4.0Fair
Sports & Action
8.0Excellent✓ wins
2.5Limited
Video & Hybrid
3.5Limited✓ wins
2.0Limited
Landscape
2.5Limited✓ wins
1.0Limited
Travel
7.0Good✓ wins
5.5Fair
Wildlife
9.0Excellent✓ wins
1.5Limited
Vlogging
6.5Good✓ wins
4.5Fair

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

OM-5 Mark II

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Human, Animal, Bird…

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 125.3, 85.2, 49.7

  • Max video bit rate

    240 Mbps vs 102 Mbps — higher is better

  • EVF magnification

    1.48 × vs 0.67 × — higher is better

  • 1080p max frame rate

    120 fps vs 59.94 fps — higher is better

  • Animal / bird AF

    Only OM-5 Mark II supports it

  • Burst (electronic)

    30 fps vs 15 fps — higher is better

  • Pre-Capture / Pre-Release

    Only OM-5 Mark II supports it

Reasons to choose

OM-D E-M10 Mark IV

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Face, Eye

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 121.7, 84.4, 49

  • Burst (mechanical)

    15 fps vs 6 fps — higher is better

  • Codecs

    Adds MOV

  • Battery life (CIPA)

    360 shots vs 310 shots — higher is better

  • Weight

    383 g vs 414 g — lower is better

Both cameras share

  • ISO min (native)Both 200
  • ISO max (native)Both 25,600
  • AF points / zonesBoth 121
  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • In-body stabilization (IBIS)Both support in-body stabilization (ibis)
  • Card slotsBoth 1

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

OM-5 Mark II

Pros

  • 7.5-stop IBIS
  • IP53 weather sealing
  • Live ND & computational modes
  • Compact travel body

Cons

  • MFT sensor
  • Single card slot
  • Premium for MFT

OM-D E-M10 Mark IV

Pros

  • IBIS at entry price
  • Compact
  • Easy to use

Cons

  • Older sensor
  • No weather sealing
  • MFT limits

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the OM-5 Mark II and OM-D E-M10 Mark IV at major authorized retailers.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Full specifications

= category winner

OM-5 Mark II
OM-D E-M10 Mark IV
Resolution
20.4 MP
20.3 MP
Sensor type
CMOS
MOS
Sensor size
17.4 x 13 mm
17.4 x 13
AA filter
No
No
OM-5 Mark II
OM-D E-M10 Mark IV
Processor
TruePic X
TruePic VIII
OM-5 Mark II
OM-D E-M10 Mark IV
ISO min (native)
200
200
ISO max (native)
25,600
25,600
ISO max (expanded)
102,400
25,600
OM-5 Mark II
OM-D E-M10 Mark IV
Shutter type
Mechanical Focal Plane Shutter and Electronic Rolling Shutter
Mechanical Focal Plane Shutter and Electronic Rolling Shutter
Max mechanical speed
1/8000
1/4000
Max electronic speed
1/32000
1/16000

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for wildlife, OM-5 Mark II or OM-D E-M10 Mark IV?

OM-5 Mark II scores 9.0/10 versus 1.5/10 for OM-D E-M10 Mark IV — 30fps burst captures fleeting moments.

What's the resolution difference between the OM-5 Mark II and OM-D E-M10 Mark IV?

OM-5 Mark II is 20.4 MP and OM-D E-M10 Mark IV is 20.3 MP, so the OM-5 Mark II captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the OM-5 Mark II and OM-D E-M10 Mark IV have in-body image stabilization?

OM-5 Mark II has 7.5-stop in-body image stabilization, while OM-D E-M10 Mark IV has 4.5-stop in-body image stabilization.

Which shoots faster bursts — the OM-5 Mark II or the OM-D E-M10 Mark IV?

OM-5 Mark II reaches 30 fps electronic. OM-D E-M10 Mark IV reaches 15 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the OM-5 Mark II and OM-D E-M10 Mark IV?

OM-5 Mark II weighs 414 g and OM-D E-M10 Mark IV weighs 383 g, so the OM-D E-M10 Mark IV is 31 g lighter.

Do the OM-5 Mark II and OM-D E-M10 Mark IV record 4K video?

OM-5 Mark II: 4K up to 30p. OM-D E-M10 Mark IV: 4K up to 29.97p.

Are the OM-5 Mark II and OM-D E-M10 Mark IV weather sealed?

OM-5 Mark II: Yes. OM-D E-M10 Mark IV: No.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 310 shots (CIPA) for the OM-5 Mark II and 360 shots for the OM-D E-M10 Mark IV, giving the OM-D E-M10 Mark IV the edge.

How much does each cost?

OM-5 Mark II launched at $1,299 and OM-D E-M10 Mark IV at $699. The OM-D E-M10 Mark IV is $600 less.

Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.

Add any camera to get a three-way OM-5 Mark II vs OM-D E-M10 Mark IV vs X comparison.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed June 2026.

Product images courtesy of OM System press materials.