Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg
OM-3

OM System

OM-3

Retro-styled MFT body with modern AF and creator-friendly design.

$1,699

Launch price

Released Jan 2025

vs
OM-D E-M10 Mark IV

OM System

OM-D E-M10 Mark IV

Entry MFT body with IBIS and approachable controls.

$699

Launch price

Released Aug 2020

OM-3 is 4.4 years newer.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Wins

8categories

OM-3

Sports & ActionTravel

Wins

2categories

OM-D E-M10 Mark IV

6 categories tied

Which would you choose?

TL;DR — Key differences

OM-3 wins 5 categories·OM-D E-M10 Mark IV wins 0 categories
  • AOM-3 has higher AF points / zones (1053 vs 121)
  • AOM-3 has higher Burst (electronic) (120 fps vs 15 fps)
  • AOM-3 has higher Max video bit rate (205 Mbps vs 102 Mbps)
  • AOM-3 has higher 4K max frame rate (59.94 fps vs 29.97 fps)
  • AOM-3 has higher EVF magnification (1.23 × vs 0.67 ×)

Key specs at a glance

OM-3OM-D E-M10 Mark IV
Resolution20.4 MP20.3 MP
SensorMFTMFT
ISO max25,60025,600
Burst120 fps15 fps
4K59.94 fps29.97 fps
IBIS6.5-stop4.5-stop
Weight413 g383 g
Battery640 shots360 shots

Size and weight, to scale

OM-3 front view

OM-3

139 × 89 × 46 mm

413 g (0.91 lb / 14.57 oz)

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

for scale

OM-D E-M10 Mark IV front view

OM-D E-M10 Mark IV

122 × 84 × 49 mm

383 g (0.84 lb / 13.51 oz)

OM-3 is 3mm thinner than OM-D E-M10 Mark IV but it is also 18mm wider and 5mm taller.

OM-3 is 30 g heavier than OM-D E-M10 Mark IV.

Depth (front-to-back): 46mm OM-3 · 49mm OM-D E-M10 Mark IV

Back view, to scale

Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.

OM-3 back view

OM-3

139 × 89 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

OM-D E-M10 Mark IV back view

OM-D E-M10 Mark IV

122 × 84 mm

Top view, to scale

Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.

OM-3 top view

OM-3

139 × 46 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

OM-D E-M10 Mark IV top view

OM-D E-M10 Mark IV

122 × 49 mm

Sensor size, to scale

OM-3

17.4 × 13 mm · Compact / large-type

226 mm² area

OM-D E-M10 Mark IV

17.4 × 13 mm · Compact / large-type

226 mm² area

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

OM-3

✓ more lenses

Micro Four Thirds

130+

native lenses available

60 first-party70 third-party

OM-D E-M10 Mark IV

✓ more lenses

Micro Four Thirds

130+

native lenses available

60 first-party70 third-party

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseOM-3OM-D E-M10 Mark IV
Portrait
4.0Fair
4.0Fair
Sports & Action
8.5Excellent✓ wins
2.5Limited
Video & Hybrid
3.5Limited✓ wins
2.0Limited
Landscape
2.5Limited✓ wins
1.0Limited
Travel
8.0Excellent✓ wins
5.5Fair
Wildlife
5.5Fair✓ wins
1.5Limited
Vlogging
6.5Good✓ wins
4.5Fair

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

OM-3

  • Subject recognition

    Adds People, Birds, Animals…

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 139.3, 88.9, 45.8

  • AF points / zones

    1053 vs 121 — higher is better

  • Burst (electronic)

    120 fps vs 15 fps — higher is better

  • Max video bit rate

    205 Mbps vs 102 Mbps — higher is better

  • Animal / bird AF

    Only OM-3 supports it

  • Pre-Capture / Pre-Release

    Only OM-3 supports it

  • 4K max frame rate

    59.94 fps vs 29.97 fps — higher is better

Reasons to choose

OM-D E-M10 Mark IV

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Face, Eye

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 121.7, 84.4, 49

  • Burst (mechanical)

    15 fps vs 10 fps — higher is better

  • Weight

    383 g vs 413 g — lower is better

Both cameras share

  • ISO min (native)Both 200
  • ISO max (native)Both 25,600
  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • 1080p max frame rateBoth 59.94 fps
  • In-body stabilization (IBIS)Both support in-body stabilization (ibis)
  • Card slotsBoth 1

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

OM-3

Pros

  • Retro design
  • Modern AF
  • Compact

Cons

  • MFT sensor
  • Premium for MFT
  • Smaller lens selection

OM-D E-M10 Mark IV

Pros

  • IBIS at entry price
  • Compact
  • Easy to use

Cons

  • Older sensor
  • No weather sealing
  • MFT limits

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the OM-3 and OM-D E-M10 Mark IV at major authorized retailers.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Full specifications

= category winner

OM-3
OM-D E-M10 Mark IV
Resolution
20.4 MP
20.3 MP
Sensor type
BSI Stacked MOS
MOS
Sensor size
17.4 x 13
17.4 x 13
AA filter
No
No
OM-3
OM-D E-M10 Mark IV
Processor
TruePic X
TruePic VIII
OM-3
OM-D E-M10 Mark IV
ISO min (native)
200
200
ISO max (native)
25,600
25,600
ISO max (expanded)
102,400
25,600
OM-3
OM-D E-M10 Mark IV
Shutter type
Mechanical Focal Plane Shutter and Electronic Rolling Shutter
Mechanical Focal Plane Shutter and Electronic Rolling Shutter
Max mechanical speed
1/8000
1/4000
Max electronic speed
1/32000
1/16000

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for sports, OM-3 or OM-D E-M10 Mark IV?

OM-3 scores 8.5/10 versus 2.5/10 for OM-D E-M10 Mark IV — 120fps burst — pro-level action capture.

What's the resolution difference between the OM-3 and OM-D E-M10 Mark IV?

OM-3 is 20.4 MP and OM-D E-M10 Mark IV is 20.3 MP, so the OM-3 captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the OM-3 and OM-D E-M10 Mark IV have in-body image stabilization?

OM-3 has 6.5-stop in-body image stabilization, while OM-D E-M10 Mark IV has 4.5-stop in-body image stabilization.

Which shoots faster bursts — the OM-3 or the OM-D E-M10 Mark IV?

OM-3 reaches 120 fps electronic. OM-D E-M10 Mark IV reaches 15 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the OM-3 and OM-D E-M10 Mark IV?

OM-3 weighs 413 g and OM-D E-M10 Mark IV weighs 383 g, so the OM-D E-M10 Mark IV is 30 g lighter.

Do the OM-3 and OM-D E-M10 Mark IV record 4K video?

OM-3: 4K up to 59.94p. OM-D E-M10 Mark IV: 4K up to 29.97p.

Are the OM-3 and OM-D E-M10 Mark IV weather sealed?

OM-3: Yes. OM-D E-M10 Mark IV: No.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 640 shots (CIPA) for the OM-3 and 360 shots for the OM-D E-M10 Mark IV, giving the OM-3 the edge.

How much does each cost?

OM-3 launched at $1,699 and OM-D E-M10 Mark IV at $699. The OM-D E-M10 Mark IV is $1,000 less.

Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.

Add any camera to get a three-way OM-3 vs OM-D E-M10 Mark IV vs X comparison.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed July 2026.

Product images courtesy of OM System press materials.