Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg
OM-3

OM System

OM-3

Retro-styled MFT body with modern AF and creator-friendly design.

$1,699

Launch price

Released Jan 2025

vs
Alpha 7R VI

Sony

Alpha 7R VI

66.8MP stacked full-frame high-resolution body with 30fps bursts, 8K 30p, 4K 120p, and Sony's AI processing unit.

$4,499

Launch price

Released Jun 2026

Alpha 7R VI is 1.3 years newer.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Wins

5categories

OM-3

Sports & ActionTravel

Wins

8categories

Alpha 7R VI

PortraitVideo & Hybrid

Which would you choose?

TL;DR — Key differences

OM-3 wins 1 categories·Alpha 7R VI wins 4 categories
  • AOM-3 has higher Burst (electronic) (120 fps vs 30 fps)
  • BAlpha 7R VI has higher EVF resolution (9,437,184 vs 2,360,000)
  • BAlpha 7R VI has higher Resolution (66.8 MP vs 20.4 MP)
  • BAlpha 7R VI has higher Max video bit rate (600 Mbps vs 205 Mbps)
  • BAlpha 7R VI has higher 4K max frame rate (120 fps vs 59.94 fps)

Key specs at a glance

OM-3Alpha 7R VI
Resolution20.4 MP66.8 MP
SensorMFTFull Frame
ISO max25,60032,000
Burst120 fps30 fps
4K59.94 fps120 fps
IBIS6.5-stopYes
Weight413 g713 g
Battery640 shots600 shots

Size and weight, to scale

OM-3 front view

OM-3

139 × 89 × 46 mm

413 g (0.91 lb / 14.57 oz)

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

for scale

Alpha 7R VI front view

Alpha 7R VI

133 × 97 × 83 mm

713 g (1.57 lb / 25.15 oz)

OM-3 is 8mm shorter and 37mm thinner than Alpha 7R VI but it is also 7mm wider.

OM-3 is 300 g lighter than Alpha 7R VI.

Depth (front-to-back): 46mm OM-3 · 83mm Alpha 7R VI

Back view, to scale

Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.

OM-3 back view

OM-3

139 × 89 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

Alpha 7R VI back view

Alpha 7R VI

133 × 97 mm

Top view, to scale

Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.

OM-3 top view

OM-3

139 × 46 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

Alpha 7R VI top view

Alpha 7R VI

133 × 83 mm

Sensor size, to scale

OM-3

17.4 × 13 mm · Compact / large-type

226 mm² area

Alpha 7R VI

35.9 × 24 mm · Full Frame

862 mm² area

3.8× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

OM-3

Micro Four Thirds

130+

native lenses available

60 first-party70 third-party

Alpha 7R VI

✓ more lenses

Sony E

350+

native lenses available

80 first-party270 third-party

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseOM-3Alpha 7R VI
Portrait
4.0Fair
8.5Excellent✓ wins
Sports & Action
8.5Excellent✓ wins
7.0Good
Video & Hybrid
3.5Limited
8.0Excellent✓ wins
Landscape
2.5Limited
7.5Good✓ wins
Travel
8.0Excellent✓ wins
5.0Fair
Wildlife
5.5Fair
6.5Good✓ wins
Vlogging
6.5Good✓ wins
5.5Fair

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

OM-3

  • Subject recognition

    Adds People, Birds, Animals…

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 139.3, 88.9, 45.8

  • Card types

    Adds SD, SDHC, SDXC

  • Burst (electronic)

    120 fps vs 30 fps — higher is better

  • Pre-Capture / Pre-Release

    Only OM-3 supports it

  • Codecs

    Adds MOV, MPEG-4 AVC

  • Weather sealing

    Only OM-3 supports it

  • Weight

    413 g vs 713 g — lower is better

Reasons to choose

Alpha 7R VI

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Human, Animal, Bird…

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 132.7, 96.9, 82.9

  • Card types

    Adds CFexpress Type A, SDXC UHS-II

  • EVF resolution

    9,437,184 vs 2,360,000 — higher is better

  • Resolution

    66.8 MP vs 20.4 MP — higher is better

  • Max video bit rate

    600 Mbps vs 205 Mbps — higher is better

  • Codecs

    Adds XAVC HS, XAVC S, XAVC S-I

  • 4K max frame rate

    120 fps vs 59.94 fps — higher is better

Both cameras share

  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • Animal / bird AFBoth support animal / bird af
  • In-body stabilization (IBIS)Both support in-body stabilization (ibis)
  • TouchscreenBoth support touchscreen
  • Wi-FiBoth support wi-fi
  • BluetoothBoth support bluetooth

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

OM-3

Pros

  • Retro design
  • Modern AF
  • Compact

Cons

  • MFT sensor
  • Premium for MFT
  • Smaller lens selection

Alpha 7R VI

Pros

  • 66.8MP stacked full-frame sensor
  • 30fps blackout-free electronic burst
  • 8K 30p and 4K 120p video
  • 5-axis sensor-shift stabilization
  • 9.44M-dot HDR OLED EVF

Cons

  • Very expensive
  • Large files demand fast cards and storage
  • 8K workflow can be heavy

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the OM-3 and Alpha 7R VI at major authorized retailers.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Full specifications

= category winner

OM-3
Alpha 7R VI
Resolution
20.4 MP
66.8 MP3.3× more
Sensor type
BSI Stacked MOS
Full-Frame Stacked CMOS
Sensor size
17.4 x 13
35.9 × 24.0 mm
AA filter
No
No
OM-3
Alpha 7R VI
Processor
TruePic X
BIONZ XR with AI processing unit
OM-3
Alpha 7R VI
ISO min (native)
200
100−100 less
ISO max (native)
25,600
32,000+0.3 stops
ISO max (expanded)
102,400
102,400
OM-3
Alpha 7R VI
Shutter type
Mechanical Focal Plane Shutter and Electronic Rolling Shutter
Mechanical focal plane shutter + electronic rolling shutter
Max mechanical speed
1/8000
1/8000 sec
Max electronic speed
1/32000

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for landscape, OM-3 or Alpha 7R VI?

Alpha 7R VI scores 7.5/10 versus 2.5/10 for OM-3 — 66.8MP — massive detail for large prints.

What's the resolution difference between the OM-3 and Alpha 7R VI?

OM-3 is 20.4 MP and Alpha 7R VI is 66.8 MP, so the Alpha 7R VI captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the OM-3 and Alpha 7R VI have in-body image stabilization?

OM-3 has 6.5-stop in-body image stabilization, while Alpha 7R VI has in-body image stabilization.

Which shoots faster bursts — the OM-3 or the Alpha 7R VI?

OM-3 reaches 120 fps electronic. Alpha 7R VI reaches 30 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the OM-3 and Alpha 7R VI?

OM-3 weighs 413 g and Alpha 7R VI weighs 713 g, so the OM-3 is 300 g lighter.

Do the OM-3 and Alpha 7R VI record 4K video?

OM-3: 4K up to 59.94p. Alpha 7R VI: 8K (max), 4K up to 120p.

Are the OM-3 and Alpha 7R VI weather sealed?

OM-3: Yes. Alpha 7R VI: No.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 640 shots (CIPA) for the OM-3 and 600 shots for the Alpha 7R VI, giving the OM-3 the edge.

How much does each cost?

OM-3 launched at $1,699 and Alpha 7R VI at $4,499. The OM-3 is $2,800 less.

Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.

Add any camera to get a three-way OM-3 vs Alpha 7R VI vs X comparison.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed July 2026.

Product images courtesy of OM System and Sony press materials.