Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg
EOS R6 Mark III

Canon

EOS R6 Mark III

Hybrid 32.5MP full-frame RF body with 7K RAW video, 40fps electronic burst, 8.5-stop IBIS, and Dual Pixel CMOS AF II.

$2,799

Launch price

Released Nov 2025

vs
OM-3

OM System

OM-3

Retro-styled MFT body with modern AF and creator-friendly design.

$1,699

Launch price

Released Jan 2025

EOS R6 Mark III is 9 months newer.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Wins

11categories

EOS R6 Mark III

Sports & ActionPortrait

Wins

3categories

OM-3

Sports & ActionTravel

4 categories tied

Which would you choose?

TL;DR — Key differences

EOS R6 Mark III wins 4 categories·OM-3 wins 1 categories
  • AEOS R6 Mark III has higher Max video bit rate (2600 Mbps vs 205 Mbps)
  • AEOS R6 Mark III has higher 1080p max frame rate (180 fps vs 59.94 fps)
  • BOM-3 has higher Burst (electronic) (120 fps vs 40 fps)
  • AEOS R6 Mark III has higher ISO max (native) (64,000 vs 25,600)
  • AEOS R6 Mark III has higher 4K max frame rate (120 fps vs 59.94 fps)

Key specs at a glance

EOS R6 Mark IIIOM-3
Resolution32.5 MP20.4 MP
SensorFull FrameMFT
ISO max64,00025,600
Burst40 fps120 fps
4K120 fps59.94 fps
IBIS8.5-stop6.5-stop
Weight699 g413 g
Battery640 shots640 shots

Size and weight, to scale

EOS R6 Mark III front view

EOS R6 Mark III

138 × 98 × 88 mm

699 g (1.54 lb / 24.66 oz)

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

for scale

OM-3 front view

OM-3

139 × 89 × 46 mm

413 g (0.91 lb / 14.57 oz)

EOS R6 Mark III is 1mm narrower than OM-3 but it is also 10mm taller and 43mm thicker.

EOS R6 Mark III is 286 g heavier than OM-3.

Depth (front-to-back): 88mm EOS R6 Mark III · 46mm OM-3

Back view, to scale

Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.

EOS R6 Mark III back view

EOS R6 Mark III

138 × 98 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

OM-3 back view

OM-3

139 × 89 mm

Top view, to scale

Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.

EOS R6 Mark III top view

EOS R6 Mark III

138 × 88 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

OM-3 top view

OM-3

139 × 46 mm

Sensor size, to scale

EOS R6 Mark III

35.9 × 23.9 mm · Full Frame

858 mm² area

OM-3

17.4 × 13 mm · Compact / large-type

226 mm² area

3.8× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

EOS R6 Mark III

Canon RF

105+

native lenses available

45 first-party60 third-party

OM-3

✓ more lenses

Micro Four Thirds

130+

native lenses available

60 first-party70 third-party

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseEOS R6 Mark IIIOM-3
Portrait
8.0Excellent✓ wins
4.0Fair
Sports & Action
10.0Excellent✓ wins
8.5Excellent
Video & Hybrid
6.5Good✓ wins
3.5Limited
Landscape
7.5Good✓ wins
2.5Limited
Travel
7.5Good
8.0Excellent✓ wins
Wildlife
6.5Good✓ wins
5.5Fair
Vlogging
5.5Fair
6.5Good✓ wins

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

EOS R6 Mark III

  • AF low-light limit

    -6.5 EV vs -5.5 EV — lower is better

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 138.4, 98.4, 88.4

  • Card types

    Adds CFexpress Type B, SD UHS-II

  • Max video bit rate

    2600 Mbps vs 205 Mbps — higher is better

  • 1080p max frame rate

    180 fps vs 59.94 fps — higher is better

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Dogs, Cats, Horses…

  • ISO max (native)

    64,000 vs 25,600 — higher is better

  • Codecs

    Adds CRM, XF-HEVC S, XF-AVC S

Reasons to choose

OM-3

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 139.3, 88.9, 45.8

  • Card types

    Adds SD, SDHC, SDXC

  • Burst (electronic)

    120 fps vs 40 fps — higher is better

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Animals, Motorsports, Airplanes

  • Codecs

    Adds MOV, MPEG-4 AVC

  • Weight

    413 g vs 699 g — lower is better

  • EVF magnification

    1.23 × vs 0.76 × — higher is better

Both cameras share

  • AF points / zonesBoth 1053
  • AF frame coverageBoth 100 %
  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • Animal / bird AFBoth support animal / bird af
  • Pre-Capture / Pre-ReleaseBoth support pre-capture / pre-release
  • In-body stabilization (IBIS)Both support in-body stabilization (ibis)

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

EOS R6 Mark III

Pros

  • 32.5MP full-frame sensor
  • 7K RAW video & 4K 120p
  • 40fps electronic burst with Pre-Continuous
  • 8.5-stop IBIS

Cons

  • Single CFexpress Type B + SD slot
  • Smaller LCD than R5 II
  • LP-E6P required for full features

OM-3

Pros

  • Retro design
  • Modern AF
  • Compact

Cons

  • MFT sensor
  • Premium for MFT
  • Smaller lens selection

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the EOS R6 Mark III and OM-3 at major authorized retailers.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Full specifications

= category winner

EOS R6 Mark III
OM-3
Resolution
32.5 MP+59%
20.4 MP
Sensor type
Full Frame CMOS
BSI Stacked MOS
Sensor size
35.9 × 23.9 mm
17.4 x 13
AA filter
Yes
No
EOS R6 Mark III
OM-3
Processor
DIGIC X
TruePic X
EOS R6 Mark III
OM-3
ISO min (native)
100−100 less
200
ISO max (native)
64,000+1.3 stops
25,600
ISO max (expanded)
102,400
102,400
EOS R6 Mark III
OM-3
Shutter type
Mechanical / Electronic 1st Curtain + Electronic
Mechanical Focal Plane Shutter and Electronic Rolling Shutter
Max mechanical speed
1/8000 sec
1/8000
Max electronic speed
1/16000 sec
1/32000

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for landscape, EOS R6 Mark III or OM-3?

EOS R6 Mark III scores 7.5/10 versus 2.5/10 for OM-3 — 32.5MP — ample resolution.

What's the resolution difference between the EOS R6 Mark III and OM-3?

EOS R6 Mark III is 32.5 MP and OM-3 is 20.4 MP, so the EOS R6 Mark III captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the EOS R6 Mark III and OM-3 have in-body image stabilization?

EOS R6 Mark III has 8.5-stop in-body image stabilization, while OM-3 has 6.5-stop in-body image stabilization.

Which shoots faster bursts — the EOS R6 Mark III or the OM-3?

EOS R6 Mark III reaches 40 fps electronic. OM-3 reaches 120 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the EOS R6 Mark III and OM-3?

EOS R6 Mark III weighs 699 g and OM-3 weighs 413 g, so the OM-3 is 286 g lighter.

Do the EOS R6 Mark III and OM-3 record 4K video?

EOS R6 Mark III: 4K up to 120p. OM-3: 4K up to 59.94p.

Are the EOS R6 Mark III and OM-3 weather sealed?

EOS R6 Mark III: Yes. OM-3: Yes.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 640 shots (CIPA) for the EOS R6 Mark III and 640 shots for the OM-3, giving the OM-3 the edge.

How much does each cost?

EOS R6 Mark III launched at $2,799 and OM-3 at $1,699. The OM-3 is $1,100 less.

Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.

Add any camera to get a three-way EOS R6 Mark III vs OM-3 vs X comparison.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed July 2026.

Product images courtesy of Canon and OM System press materials.