Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg Compare
EOS R6 Mark III

Canon

EOS R6 Mark III

Hybrid 32.5MP full-frame RF body with 7K RAW video, 40fps electronic burst, 8.5-stop IBIS, and Dual Pixel CMOS AF II.

$2,799

Released Nov 2025

vs

OM System

OM-3

Retro-styled MFT body with modern AF and creator-friendly design.

$1,699

Released Jan 2025

EOS R6 Mark III is 9 months newer.

Wins

7categories

EOS R6 Mark III

Sports & ActionPortrait

Wins

6categories

OM-3

Sports & ActionTravel

4 categories tied

TL;DR — Key differences

EOS R6 Mark III wins 3 categories·OM-3 wins 2 categories
  • AEOS R6 Mark III has higher Max video bit rate (2600 Mbps vs 150 Mbps)
  • BOM-3 has higher Burst (electronic) (120 fps vs 40 fps)
  • AEOS R6 Mark III has higher 4K max frame rate (120 fps vs 60 fps)
  • AEOS R6 Mark III has higher Card slots (2 vs 1)
  • BOM-3 has higher ISO max (native) (102,400 vs 64,000)

Key specs at a glance

EOS R6 Mark IIIOM-3
Resolution32.5 MP20.4 MP
SensorFull FrameMFT
ISO max64,000102,400
Burst40 fps120 fps
4K120 fps60 fps
IBIS8.5-stop6.5-stop
Weight699 g496 g
Battery640 shots640 shots

Size and weight, to scale

EOS R6 Mark III front view

EOS R6 Mark III

138 × 98 × 88 mm

699 g (1.54 lb / 24.66 oz)

OM-3

139 × 89 × 46 mm

496 g (1.09 lb / 17.50 oz)

EOS R6 Mark III is 1mm narrower than OM-3 but it is also 10mm taller and 43mm thicker.

EOS R6 Mark III is 203 g heavier than OM-3.

Depth (front-to-back): 88mm EOS R6 Mark III · 46mm OM-3

Back view, to scale

Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.

EOS R6 Mark III back view

EOS R6 Mark III

138 × 98 mm

OM-3

139 × 89 mm

Top view, to scale

Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.

EOS R6 Mark III top view

EOS R6 Mark III

138 × 88 mm

OM-3

139 × 46 mm

Sensor size, to scale

EOS R6 Mark III

35.9 × 23.9 mm · Full Frame

858 mm² area

OM-3

17.4 × 13 mm · Compact / large-type

226 mm² area

3.8× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

EOS R6 Mark III

Canon RF

105+

native lenses available

45 first-party60 third-party

OM-3

✓ more lenses

Micro Four Thirds

130+

native lenses available

60 first-party70 third-party

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseEOS R6 Mark IIIOM-3
Portrait
8.0Excellent✓ wins
4.0Fair
Sports & Action
8.5Excellent
8.5Excellent
Video & Hybrid
6.5Good✓ wins
5.5Fair
Landscape
7.5Good✓ wins
2.5Limited
Travel
7.5Good
8.0Excellent✓ wins
Wildlife
6.5Good
6.5Good
Vlogging
5.5Fair
7.5Good✓ wins

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

EOS R6 Mark III

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 138.4, 98.4, 88.4

  • Max video bit rate

    2600 Mbps vs 150 Mbps — higher is better

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Dogs, Cats, Horses…

  • Codecs

    Adds CRM, XF-HEVC S, XF-AVC S

  • AA filter

    Only EOS R6 Mark III supports it

  • 4K max frame rate

    120 fps vs 60 fps — higher is better

  • Internal RAW video

    Only EOS R6 Mark III supports it

  • Card slots

    2 vs 1 — higher is better

Reasons to choose

OM-3

  • AF low-light limit

    -8 EV vs -6.5 EV — lower is better

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 139.3, 88.9, 45.8

  • Burst (electronic)

    120 fps vs 40 fps — higher is better

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Animals, Motorsports, Airplanes

  • Card types

    Adds SD UHS-I

  • ISO max (native)

    102,400 vs 64,000 — higher is better

  • Codecs

    Adds MOV

  • Weight

    496 g vs 699 g — lower is better

Both cameras share

  • AF points / zonesBoth 1053
  • AF frame coverageBoth 100 %
  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • Animal / bird AFBoth support animal / bird af
  • Pre-Capture / Pre-ReleaseBoth support pre-capture / pre-release
  • In-body stabilizationBoth support in-body stabilization

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

EOS R6 Mark III

Pros

  • 32.5MP full-frame sensor
  • 7K RAW video & 4K 120p
  • 40fps electronic burst with Pre-Continuous
  • 8.5-stop IBIS

Cons

  • Single CFexpress Type B + SD slot
  • Smaller LCD than R5 II
  • LP-E6P required for full features

OM-3

Pros

  • Retro design
  • Modern AF
  • Compact

Cons

  • MFT sensor
  • Premium for MFT
  • Smaller lens selection

Full specifications

= category winner

EOS R6 Mark III
OM-3
Resolution
32.5 MP+59%
20.4 MP
Sensor type
Full Frame CMOS
4/3 Stacked BSI Live MOS
Sensor size
35.9 × 23.9 mm
17.4 x 13.0 mm
AA filter
Yes
No
EOS R6 Mark III
OM-3
AF system
Dual Pixel CMOS AF II
1053-point Cross Quad Pixel phase detection AF
AF points / zones
1053
1053
AF frame coverage
100 %
100 %
AF low-light limit
-6.5 EV
-8 EV
Eye AF
Yes
Yes
Animal / bird AF
Yes
Yes
Subject recognition
People, Dogs, Cats, Birds, Horses, Cars, Motorbikes, Aircraft, Trains
People, Birds, Animals, Motorsports, Airplanes, Trains
EOS R6 Mark III
OM-3
Burst (mechanical)
12 fps+20%
10 fps
Burst (electronic)
40 fps
120 fps3× more
Pre-Capture / Pre-Release
Yes
Yes
RAW buffer depth
150 frames
EOS R6 Mark III
OM-3
Max resolution
7K RAW
4K / C4K
4K max frame rate
120 fps2× more
60 fps
Max video bit rate
2600 Mbps17.3× more
150 Mbps
Internal RAW video
Yes
No
Log profile
Canon Log 2 / Canon Log 3 / HDR PQ / HLG
OM-Log / HLG
Codecs
CRM, XF-HEVC S, XF-AVC S, H.265, H.264
H.264, H.265, MOV
EOS R6 Mark III
OM-3
Weight
699 g
496 g−203 g less
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
138.4 × 98.4 × 88.4 mm
139.3 × 88.9 × 45.8 mm
Weather sealing
Yes
Yes

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for landscape, EOS R6 Mark III or OM-3?

EOS R6 Mark III scores 7.5/10 versus 2.5/10 for OM-3 — 32.5MP — ample resolution.

What's the resolution difference between the EOS R6 Mark III and OM-3?

EOS R6 Mark III is 32.5 MP and OM-3 is 20.4 MP, so the EOS R6 Mark III captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the EOS R6 Mark III and OM-3 have in-body image stabilization?

EOS R6 Mark III has 8.5-stop in-body image stabilization, while oM-3 has 6.5-stop in-body image stabilization.

Which shoots faster bursts — the EOS R6 Mark III or the OM-3?

EOS R6 Mark III reaches 40 fps electronic. OM-3 reaches 120 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the EOS R6 Mark III and OM-3?

EOS R6 Mark III weighs 699 g and OM-3 weighs 496 g, so the OM-3 is 203 g lighter.

Do the EOS R6 Mark III and OM-3 record 4K video?

EOS R6 Mark III: 4K up to 120p. OM-3: 4K up to 60p.

Are the EOS R6 Mark III and OM-3 weather sealed?

EOS R6 Mark III: Yes. OM-3: Yes.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 640 shots (CIPA) for the EOS R6 Mark III and 640 shots for the OM-3, giving the OM-3 the edge.

How much does each cost?

EOS R6 Mark III launched at $2,799 and OM-3 at $1,699. The OM-3 is $1,100 less.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed May 2026.

Product images courtesy of Canon and OM System press materials.