Canon
EOS R6 Mark II
Versatile 24.2MP full-frame hybrid with class-leading AF and 4K 60p video.
$2,499
Released Nov 2022
OM System
OM-D E-M10 Mark IV
Entry MFT body with IBIS and approachable controls.
$699
Released Aug 2020
EOS R6 Mark II is 2.3 years newer.
Wins
EOS R6 Mark II
Wins
OM-D E-M10 Mark IV
1 categories tied
Check current prices
Search these camera bodies at major authorized retailers to check current discounts, bundled lenses, and certified refurbished deals:
TL;DR — Key differences
- AEOS R6 Mark II has higher AF points / zones (1053 vs 121)
- AEOS R6 Mark II has higher ISO max (native) (102,400 vs 25,600)
- AEOS R6 Mark II has higher Burst (electronic) (40 fps vs 15 fps)
- AEOS R6 Mark II has higher Max video bit rate (340 Mbps vs 150 Mbps)
- AEOS R6 Mark II has lower ISO min (native) (100 vs 200)
Key specs at a glance
Size and weight, to scale
EOS R6 Mark II
138 × 98 × 88 mm
680 g (1.50 lb / 23.99 oz)
OM-D E-M10 Mark IV
122 × 85 × 49 mm
383 g (0.84 lb / 13.51 oz)
EOS R6 Mark II is 17mm wider, 14mm taller, and 39mm thicker than OM-D E-M10 Mark IV.
EOS R6 Mark II is 297 g heavier than OM-D E-M10 Mark IV.
Depth (front-to-back): 88mm EOS R6 Mark II · 49mm OM-D E-M10 Mark IV
Back view, to scale
Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.
EOS R6 Mark II
138 × 98 mm
OM-D E-M10 Mark IV
122 × 85 mm
Top view, to scale
Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.
EOS R6 Mark II
138 × 88 mm
OM-D E-M10 Mark IV
122 × 49 mm
Sensor size, to scale
EOS R6 Mark II
35.9 × 23.9 mm · Full Frame
858 mm² area
OM-D E-M10 Mark IV
17.4 × 13 mm · Compact / large-type
226 mm² area
3.8× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.
Lens ecosystem
Native lens selection
EOS R6 Mark II
Canon RF
105+
native lenses available
OM-D E-M10 Mark IV
✓ more lensesMicro Four Thirds
130+
native lenses available
Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.
Use-case scoring
Which one for what?
Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class
Why pick one over the other
Reasons to choose
EOS R6 Mark II
Subject recognition
Adds People, Dogs, Cats…
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
Adds 138.4, 98.4, 88.4
Card types
Adds SD UHS-II, SD UHS-II
AF points / zones
1053 vs 121 — higher is better
ISO max (native)
102,400 vs 25,600 — higher is better
Burst (electronic)
40 fps vs 15 fps — higher is better
Max video bit rate
340 Mbps vs 150 Mbps — higher is better
AA filter
Only EOS R6 Mark II supports it
Reasons to choose
OM-D E-M10 Mark IV
Subject recognition
Adds Face, Eye
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
Adds 121.7, 84.6, 49
Card types
Adds SD UHS-I
Codecs
Adds MOV
Weight
383 g vs 680 g — lower is better
EVF magnification
0.78 × vs 0.76 × — higher is better
Both cameras share
- ✓Eye AF — Both support eye af
- ✓In-body stabilization — Both support in-body stabilization
- ✓EVF refresh rate — Both 120 Hz
- ✓Touchscreen — Both support touchscreen
- ✓Wi-Fi — Both support wi-fi
- ✓Bluetooth — Both support bluetooth
Pros & cons at a glance
Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.
EOS R6 Mark II
Pros
- ✓Up to 40fps electronic burst
- ✓4K 60p oversampled from 6K
- ✓Dual Pixel CMOS AF II — superb subject tracking
- ✓8-stop IBIS
- ✓Fully articulating touchscreen
Cons
- –24.2MP may feel limiting for large prints
- –No CFexpress on base body
- –Short battery life vs. A7 IV
OM-D E-M10 Mark IV
Pros
- ✓IBIS at entry price
- ✓Compact
- ✓Easy to use
Cons
- –Older sensor
- –No weather sealing
- –MFT limits
Full specifications
✓ = category winner
Frequently asked
Quick answers generated from verified specs.
Which is better for sports, EOS R6 Mark II or OM-D E-M10 Mark IV?
EOS R6 Mark II scores 8.5/10 versus 2.5/10 for OM-D E-M10 Mark IV — 40fps burst — pro-level action capture.
What's the resolution difference between the EOS R6 Mark II and OM-D E-M10 Mark IV?
EOS R6 Mark II is 24.2 MP and OM-D E-M10 Mark IV is 20.3 MP, so the EOS R6 Mark II captures more detail for cropping and large prints.
Do the EOS R6 Mark II and OM-D E-M10 Mark IV have in-body image stabilization?
EOS R6 Mark II has 8-stop in-body image stabilization, while oM-D E-M10 Mark IV has 4.5-stop in-body image stabilization.
Which shoots faster bursts — the EOS R6 Mark II or the OM-D E-M10 Mark IV?
EOS R6 Mark II reaches 40 fps electronic. OM-D E-M10 Mark IV reaches 15 fps electronic.
What's the weight difference between the EOS R6 Mark II and OM-D E-M10 Mark IV?
EOS R6 Mark II weighs 680 g and OM-D E-M10 Mark IV weighs 383 g, so the OM-D E-M10 Mark IV is 297 g lighter.
Do the EOS R6 Mark II and OM-D E-M10 Mark IV record 4K video?
EOS R6 Mark II: 4K up to 60p. OM-D E-M10 Mark IV: 4K up to 30p.
Are the EOS R6 Mark II and OM-D E-M10 Mark IV weather sealed?
EOS R6 Mark II: Yes. OM-D E-M10 Mark IV: No.
Which has better battery life?
Rated battery life is 760 shots (CIPA) for the EOS R6 Mark II and 640 shots for the OM-D E-M10 Mark IV, giving the EOS R6 Mark II the edge.
How much does each cost?
EOS R6 Mark II launched at $2,499 and OM-D E-M10 Mark IV at $699. The OM-D E-M10 Mark IV is $1,800 less.
Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed May 2026.
Product images courtesy of Canon and OM System press materials.