Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg
OM-3

OM System

OM-3

Retro-styled MFT body with modern AF and creator-friendly design.

$1,699

Launch price

Released Jan 2025

vs
OM-5 Mark II

OM System

OM-5 Mark II

Updated compact MFT travel body with 20MP sensor, 7.5-stop IBIS, IP53 sealing, and Live ND.

$1,299

Launch price

Released Jan 2025

Released within a month of each other.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Wins

6categories

OM-3

Sports & ActionTravel

Wins

5categories

OM-5 Mark II

WildlifeSports & Action

7 categories tied

Which would you choose?

TL;DR — Key differences

OM-3 wins 4 categories·OM-5 Mark II wins 1 categories
  • AOM-3 has higher AF points / zones (1053 vs 121)
  • AOM-3 has higher Burst (electronic) (120 fps vs 30 fps)
  • AOM-3 has higher Battery life (CIPA) (640 shots vs 310 shots)
  • BOM-5 Mark II has higher 1080p max frame rate (120 fps vs 59.94 fps)
  • AOM-3 has higher 4K max frame rate (59.94 fps vs 30 fps)

Key specs at a glance

OM-3OM-5 Mark II
Resolution20.4 MP20.4 MP
SensorMFTMFT
ISO max25,60025,600
Burst120 fps30 fps
4K59.94 fps30 fps
IBIS6.5-stop7.5-stop
Weight413 g414 g
Battery640 shots310 shots

Size and weight, to scale

OM-3 front view

OM-3

139 × 89 × 46 mm

413 g (0.91 lb / 14.57 oz)

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

for scale

OM-5 Mark II front view

OM-5 Mark II

125 × 85 × 50 mm

414 g (0.91 lb / 14.60 oz)

OM-3 is 4mm thinner than OM-5 Mark II but it is also 14mm wider and 4mm taller.

OM-3 is 1 g lighter than OM-5 Mark II.

Depth (front-to-back): 46mm OM-3 · 50mm OM-5 Mark II

Back view, to scale

Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.

OM-3 back view

OM-3

139 × 89 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

OM-5 Mark II back view

OM-5 Mark II

125 × 85 mm

Top view, to scale

Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.

OM-3 top view

OM-3

139 × 46 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

OM-5 Mark II top view

OM-5 Mark II

125 × 50 mm

Sensor size, to scale

OM-3

17.4 × 13 mm · Compact / large-type

226 mm² area

OM-5 Mark II

17.4 × 13 mm · Compact / large-type

226 mm² area

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

OM-3

✓ more lenses

Micro Four Thirds

130+

native lenses available

60 first-party70 third-party

OM-5 Mark II

✓ more lenses

Micro Four Thirds

130+

native lenses available

60 first-party70 third-party

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseOM-3OM-5 Mark II
Portrait
4.0Fair
4.0Fair
Sports & Action
8.5Excellent✓ wins
8.0Excellent
Video & Hybrid
3.5Limited
3.5Limited
Landscape
2.5Limited
2.5Limited
Travel
8.0Excellent✓ wins
7.0Good
Wildlife
5.5Fair
9.0Excellent✓ wins
Vlogging
6.5Good
6.5Good

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

OM-3

  • Subject recognition

    Adds People, Birds, Animals…

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 139.3, 88.9, 45.8

  • AF points / zones

    1053 vs 121 — higher is better

  • Burst (electronic)

    120 fps vs 30 fps — higher is better

  • Battery life (CIPA)

    640 shots vs 310 shots — higher is better

  • Codecs

    Adds H.265, MOV

  • 4K max frame rate

    59.94 fps vs 30 fps — higher is better

  • Burst (mechanical)

    10 fps vs 6 fps — higher is better

Reasons to choose

OM-5 Mark II

  • AF low-light limit

    -7 EV vs -5.5 EV — lower is better

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Human, Animal, Bird…

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 125.3, 85.2, 49.7

  • 1080p max frame rate

    120 fps vs 59.94 fps — higher is better

  • EVF magnification

    1.48 × vs 1.23 × — higher is better

  • Max video bit rate

    240 Mbps vs 205 Mbps — higher is better

  • IBIS effectiveness

    7.5 stops vs 6.5 stops — higher is better

Both cameras share

  • ResolutionBoth 20.4 MP
  • ISO min (native)Both 200
  • ISO max (native)Both 25,600
  • AF frame coverageBoth 100 %
  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • Animal / bird AFBoth support animal / bird af

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

OM-3

Pros

  • Retro design
  • Modern AF
  • Compact

Cons

  • MFT sensor
  • Premium for MFT
  • Smaller lens selection

OM-5 Mark II

Pros

  • 7.5-stop IBIS
  • IP53 weather sealing
  • Live ND & computational modes
  • Compact travel body

Cons

  • MFT sensor
  • Single card slot
  • Premium for MFT

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the OM-3 and OM-5 Mark II at major authorized retailers.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Full specifications

= category winner

OM-3
OM-5 Mark II
Resolution
20.4 MP
20.4 MP
Sensor type
BSI Stacked MOS
CMOS
Sensor size
17.4 x 13
17.4 x 13 mm
AA filter
No
No
OM-3
OM-5 Mark II
Processor
TruePic X
TruePic X
OM-3
OM-5 Mark II
ISO min (native)
200
200
ISO max (native)
25,600
25,600
ISO max (expanded)
102,400
102,400
OM-3
OM-5 Mark II
Shutter type
Mechanical Focal Plane Shutter and Electronic Rolling Shutter
Mechanical Focal Plane Shutter and Electronic Rolling Shutter
Max mechanical speed
1/8000
1/8000
Max electronic speed
1/32000
1/32000

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for wildlife, OM-3 or OM-5 Mark II?

OM-5 Mark II scores 9.0/10 versus 5.5/10 for OM-3 — 30fps burst captures fleeting moments.

What's the resolution difference between the OM-3 and OM-5 Mark II?

Both cameras share the same 20.4 MP resolution.

Do the OM-3 and OM-5 Mark II have in-body image stabilization?

OM-3 has 6.5-stop in-body image stabilization, while OM-5 Mark II has 7.5-stop in-body image stabilization.

Which shoots faster bursts — the OM-3 or the OM-5 Mark II?

OM-3 reaches 120 fps electronic. OM-5 Mark II reaches 30 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the OM-3 and OM-5 Mark II?

OM-3 weighs 413 g and OM-5 Mark II weighs 414 g, so the OM-3 is 1 g lighter.

Do the OM-3 and OM-5 Mark II record 4K video?

OM-3: 4K up to 59.94p. OM-5 Mark II: 4K up to 30p.

Are the OM-3 and OM-5 Mark II weather sealed?

OM-3: Yes. OM-5 Mark II: Yes.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 640 shots (CIPA) for the OM-3 and 310 shots for the OM-5 Mark II, giving the OM-3 the edge.

How much does each cost?

OM-3 launched at $1,699 and OM-5 Mark II at $1,299. The OM-5 Mark II is $400 less.

Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.

Add any camera to get a three-way OM-3 vs OM-5 Mark II vs X comparison.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed July 2026.

Product images courtesy of OM System press materials.