Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg
OM-3

OM System

OM-3

Retro-styled MFT body with modern AF and creator-friendly design.

$1,699

Launch price

Released Jan 2025

vs
PEN

OM System

PEN

First OM SYSTEM-branded PEN: compact rangefinder-style Micro Four Thirds body with 20.4MP Live MOS, 5-axis IBIS, built-in EVF, IPX1 sealing, and in-camera computational modes.

$1,000

Launch price

Released Sep 2026

PEN is 1.6 years newer.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Wins

8categories

OM-3

Sports & ActionTravel

Wins

3categories

PEN

TravelVlogging

6 categories tied

Which would you choose?

TL;DR — Key differences

OM-3 wins 5 categories·PEN wins 0 categories
  • AOM-3 has higher AF points / zones (1053 vs 121)
  • AOM-3 has higher Burst (electronic) (120 fps vs 30 fps)
  • AOM-3 has higher Burst (mechanical) (10 fps vs 5 fps)
  • AOM-3 has higher 4K max frame rate (59.94 fps vs 30 fps)
  • AOM-3 has higher Battery life (CIPA) (640 shots vs 410 shots)

Key specs at a glance

OM-3PEN
Resolution20.4 MP20.4 MP
SensorMFTMFT
ISO max25,60025,600
Burst120 fps30 fps
4K59.94 fps30 fps
IBIS6.5-stop5.5-stop
Weight413 g393 g
Battery640 shots410 shots

Size and weight, to scale

OM-3 front view

OM-3

139 × 89 × 46 mm

413 g (0.91 lb / 14.57 oz)

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

for scale

PEN front view

PEN

126 × 75 × 43 mm

393 g (0.87 lb / 13.86 oz)

OM-3 is 14mm wider, 14mm taller, and 3mm thicker than PEN.

OM-3 is 20 g heavier than PEN.

Depth (front-to-back): 46mm OM-3 · 43mm PEN

Back view, to scale

Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.

OM-3 back view

OM-3

139 × 89 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

PEN back view

PEN

126 × 75 mm

Top view, to scale

Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.

OM-3 top view

OM-3

139 × 46 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

PEN top view

PEN

126 × 43 mm

Sensor size, to scale

OM-3

17.4 × 13 mm · Compact / large-type

226 mm² area

PEN

17.4 × 13 mm · Compact / large-type

226 mm² area

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

OM-3

✓ more lenses

Micro Four Thirds

130+

native lenses available

60 first-party70 third-party

PEN

✓ more lenses

Micro Four Thirds

130+

native lenses available

60 first-party70 third-party

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseOM-3PEN
Portrait
4.0Fair
4.0Fair
Sports & Action
8.5Excellent✓ wins
6.0Good
Video & Hybrid
3.5Limited✓ wins
3.0Limited
Landscape
2.5Limited
2.5Limited
Travel
8.0Excellent✓ wins
7.5Good
Wildlife
5.5Fair
5.5Fair
Vlogging
6.5Good
6.5Good

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

OM-3

  • AF low-light limit

    -5.5 EV vs -3.5 EV — lower is better

  • Subject recognition

    Adds People, Birds, Animals…

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 139.3, 88.9, 45.8

  • AF points / zones

    1053 vs 121 — higher is better

  • Burst (electronic)

    120 fps vs 30 fps — higher is better

  • Burst (mechanical)

    10 fps vs 5 fps — higher is better

  • Headphone jack (3.5mm)

    Only OM-3 supports it

  • 4K max frame rate

    59.94 fps vs 30 fps — higher is better

Reasons to choose

PEN

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Human, Dog, Cat

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 125.8, 74.5, 43.3

  • Max video bit rate

    240 Mbps vs 205 Mbps — higher is better

  • Weight

    393 g vs 413 g — lower is better

  • 1080p max frame rate

    60 fps vs 59.94 fps — higher is better

Both cameras share

  • ResolutionBoth 20.4 MP
  • ISO min (native)Both 200
  • ISO max (native)Both 25,600
  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • Animal / bird AFBoth support animal / bird af
  • Pre-Capture / Pre-ReleaseBoth support pre-capture / pre-release

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

OM-3

Pros

  • Retro design
  • Modern AF
  • Compact

Cons

  • MFT sensor
  • Premium for MFT
  • Smaller lens selection

PEN

Pros

  • 393g rangefinder body with built-in 2.36M-dot EVF
  • First PEN with IPX1 dust/splash sealing
  • 5-axis IBIS up to 5.5 stops + 121-point cross-type AF
  • Hi-Res, Live ND, Focus Stacking, HDR via CP button
  • 4K / C4K video, vertical video, 3.5mm mic jack

Cons

  • Micro Four Thirds sensor vs APS-C/FF rivals
  • 4K capped at 30p (C4K 24p only)
  • IPX1 is lighter sealing than OM-5 II / OM-3
  • Single SD slot, no headphone jack

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the OM-3 and PEN at major authorized retailers.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Full specifications

= category winner

OM-3
PEN
Resolution
20.4 MP
20.4 MP
Sensor type
BSI Stacked MOS
MOS
Sensor size
17.4 x 13
17.4 x 13
AA filter
No
No
OM-3
PEN
Processor
TruePic X
TruePic IX
OM-3
PEN
ISO min (native)
200
200
ISO max (native)
25,600
25,600
ISO max (expanded)
102,400
25,600
OM-3
PEN
Shutter type
Mechanical Focal Plane Shutter and Electronic Rolling Shutter
Mechanical Focal Plane Shutter and Electronic Rolling Shutter
Max mechanical speed
1/8000
1/4000
Max electronic speed
1/32000
1/3200

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for sports, OM-3 or PEN?

OM-3 scores 8.5/10 versus 6.0/10 for PEN — 120fps burst — pro-level action capture.

What's the resolution difference between the OM-3 and PEN?

Both cameras share the same 20.4 MP resolution.

Do the OM-3 and PEN have in-body image stabilization?

OM-3 has 6.5-stop in-body image stabilization, while PEN has 5.5-stop in-body image stabilization.

Which shoots faster bursts — the OM-3 or the PEN?

OM-3 reaches 120 fps electronic. PEN reaches 30 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the OM-3 and PEN?

OM-3 weighs 413 g and PEN weighs 393 g, so the PEN is 20 g lighter.

Do the OM-3 and PEN record 4K video?

OM-3: 4K up to 59.94p. PEN: 4K up to 30p.

Are the OM-3 and PEN weather sealed?

OM-3: Yes. PEN: Yes.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 640 shots (CIPA) for the OM-3 and 410 shots for the PEN, giving the OM-3 the edge.

How much does each cost?

OM-3 launched at $1,699 and PEN at $1,000. The PEN is $699 less.

Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.

Add any camera to get a three-way OM-3 vs PEN vs X comparison.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed September 2026.

Product images courtesy of OM System press materials.