Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg
OM-5 Mark II

OM System

OM-5 Mark II

Updated compact MFT travel body with 20MP sensor, 7.5-stop IBIS, IP53 sealing, and Live ND.

$1,299

Launch price

Released Jan 2025

vs
PEN

OM System

PEN

First OM SYSTEM-branded PEN: compact rangefinder-style Micro Four Thirds body with 20.4MP Live MOS, 5-axis IBIS, built-in EVF, IPX1 sealing, and in-camera computational modes.

$1,000

Launch price

Released Sep 2026

PEN is 1.6 years newer.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Wins

6categories

OM-5 Mark II

WildlifeSports & Action

Wins

2categories

PEN

TravelVlogging

10 categories tied

Which would you choose?

TL;DR — Key differences

OM-5 Mark II wins 4 categories·PEN wins 1 categories
  • AOM-5 Mark II has higher RAW buffer depth (60 frames vs 29 frames)
  • AOM-5 Mark II has higher 1080p max frame rate (120 fps vs 60 fps)
  • AOM-5 Mark II has higher IBIS effectiveness (7.5 stops vs 5.5 stops)
  • AOM-5 Mark II has higher EVF magnification (1.48 × vs 1.1 ×)
  • BPEN has higher Battery life (CIPA) (410 shots vs 310 shots)

Key specs at a glance

OM-5 Mark IIPEN
Resolution20.4 MP20.4 MP
SensorMFTMFT
ISO max25,60025,600
Burst30 fps30 fps
4K30 fps30 fps
IBIS7.5-stop5.5-stop
Weight414 g393 g
Battery310 shots410 shots

Size and weight, to scale

OM-5 Mark II front view

OM-5 Mark II

125 × 85 × 50 mm

414 g (0.91 lb / 14.60 oz)

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

for scale

PEN front view

PEN

126 × 75 × 43 mm

393 g (0.87 lb / 13.86 oz)

OM-5 Mark II is 1mm narrower than PEN but it is also 11mm taller and 6mm thicker.

OM-5 Mark II is 21 g heavier than PEN.

Depth (front-to-back): 50mm OM-5 Mark II · 43mm PEN

Back view, to scale

Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.

OM-5 Mark II back view

OM-5 Mark II

125 × 85 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

PEN back view

PEN

126 × 75 mm

Top view, to scale

Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.

OM-5 Mark II top view

OM-5 Mark II

125 × 50 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

PEN top view

PEN

126 × 43 mm

Sensor size, to scale

OM-5 Mark II

17.4 × 13 mm · Compact / large-type

226 mm² area

PEN

17.4 × 13 mm · Compact / large-type

226 mm² area

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

OM-5 Mark II

✓ more lenses

Micro Four Thirds

130+

native lenses available

60 first-party70 third-party

PEN

✓ more lenses

Micro Four Thirds

130+

native lenses available

60 first-party70 third-party

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseOM-5 Mark IIPEN
Portrait
4.0Fair
4.0Fair
Sports & Action
8.0Excellent✓ wins
6.0Good
Video & Hybrid
3.5Limited✓ wins
3.0Limited
Landscape
2.5Limited
2.5Limited
Travel
7.0Good
7.5Good✓ wins
Wildlife
9.0Excellent✓ wins
5.5Fair
Vlogging
6.5Good
6.5Good

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

OM-5 Mark II

  • AF low-light limit

    -7 EV vs -3.5 EV — lower is better

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 125.3, 85.2, 49.7

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Animal, Bird, Vehicle

  • RAW buffer depth

    60 frames vs 29 frames — higher is better

  • 1080p max frame rate

    120 fps vs 60 fps — higher is better

  • Headphone jack (3.5mm)

    Only OM-5 Mark II supports it

  • IBIS effectiveness

    7.5 stops vs 5.5 stops — higher is better

  • EVF magnification

    1.48 × vs 1.1 × — higher is better

Reasons to choose

PEN

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 125.8, 74.5, 43.3

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Dog, Cat

  • Codecs

    Adds MOV

  • Battery life (CIPA)

    410 shots vs 310 shots — higher is better

  • Weight

    393 g vs 414 g — lower is better

Both cameras share

  • ResolutionBoth 20.4 MP
  • ISO min (native)Both 200
  • ISO max (native)Both 25,600
  • AF points / zonesBoth 121
  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • Animal / bird AFBoth support animal / bird af

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

OM-5 Mark II

Pros

  • 7.5-stop IBIS
  • IP53 weather sealing
  • Live ND & computational modes
  • Compact travel body

Cons

  • MFT sensor
  • Single card slot
  • Premium for MFT

PEN

Pros

  • 393g rangefinder body with built-in 2.36M-dot EVF
  • First PEN with IPX1 dust/splash sealing
  • 5-axis IBIS up to 5.5 stops + 121-point cross-type AF
  • Hi-Res, Live ND, Focus Stacking, HDR via CP button
  • 4K / C4K video, vertical video, 3.5mm mic jack

Cons

  • Micro Four Thirds sensor vs APS-C/FF rivals
  • 4K capped at 30p (C4K 24p only)
  • IPX1 is lighter sealing than OM-5 II / OM-3
  • Single SD slot, no headphone jack

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the OM-5 Mark II and PEN at major authorized retailers.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Full specifications

= category winner

OM-5 Mark II
PEN
Resolution
20.4 MP
20.4 MP
Sensor type
CMOS
MOS
Sensor size
17.4 x 13 mm
17.4 x 13
AA filter
No
No
OM-5 Mark II
PEN
Processor
TruePic X
TruePic IX
OM-5 Mark II
PEN
ISO min (native)
200
200
ISO max (native)
25,600
25,600
ISO max (expanded)
102,400
25,600
OM-5 Mark II
PEN
Shutter type
Mechanical Focal Plane Shutter and Electronic Rolling Shutter
Mechanical Focal Plane Shutter and Electronic Rolling Shutter
Max mechanical speed
1/8000
1/4000
Max electronic speed
1/32000
1/3200

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for wildlife, OM-5 Mark II or PEN?

OM-5 Mark II scores 9.0/10 versus 5.5/10 for PEN — 30fps burst captures fleeting moments.

What's the resolution difference between the OM-5 Mark II and PEN?

Both cameras share the same 20.4 MP resolution.

Do the OM-5 Mark II and PEN have in-body image stabilization?

OM-5 Mark II has 7.5-stop in-body image stabilization, while PEN has 5.5-stop in-body image stabilization.

Which shoots faster bursts — the OM-5 Mark II or the PEN?

OM-5 Mark II reaches 30 fps electronic. PEN reaches 30 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the OM-5 Mark II and PEN?

OM-5 Mark II weighs 414 g and PEN weighs 393 g, so the PEN is 21 g lighter.

Do the OM-5 Mark II and PEN record 4K video?

OM-5 Mark II: 4K up to 30p. PEN: 4K up to 30p.

Are the OM-5 Mark II and PEN weather sealed?

OM-5 Mark II: Yes. PEN: Yes.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 310 shots (CIPA) for the OM-5 Mark II and 410 shots for the PEN, giving the PEN the edge.

How much does each cost?

OM-5 Mark II launched at $1,299 and PEN at $1,000. The PEN is $299 less.

Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.

Add any camera to get a three-way OM-5 Mark II vs PEN vs X comparison.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed September 2026.

Product images courtesy of OM System press materials.