Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg
EOS R6 Mark II

Canon

EOS R6 Mark II

Versatile 24.2MP full-frame hybrid with class-leading AF and 4K 60p video.

$2,499

Launch price

Released Nov 2022

vs
PEN

OM System

PEN

First OM SYSTEM-branded PEN: compact rangefinder-style Micro Four Thirds body with 20.4MP Live MOS, 5-axis IBIS, built-in EVF, IPX1 sealing, and in-camera computational modes.

$1,000

Launch price

Released Sep 2026

PEN is 3.8 years newer.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Wins

14categories

EOS R6 Mark II

Sports & ActionPortrait

Wins

2categories

PEN

TravelVlogging

1 categories tied

Which would you choose?

TL;DR — Key differences

EOS R6 Mark II wins 5 categories·PEN wins 0 categories
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher AF points / zones (1053 vs 121)
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher RAW buffer depth (180 frames vs 29 frames)
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher ISO max (native) (102,400 vs 25,600)
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher Burst (mechanical) (12 fps vs 5 fps)
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has lower ISO min (native) (100 vs 200)

Key specs at a glance

EOS R6 Mark IIPEN
Resolution24.2 MP20.4 MP
SensorFull FrameMFT
ISO max102,40025,600
Burst40 fps30 fps
4K60 fps30 fps
IBIS8-stop5.5-stop
Weight670 g393 g
Battery760 shots410 shots

Size and weight, to scale

EOS R6 Mark II front view

EOS R6 Mark II

138 × 98 × 88 mm

670 g (1.48 lb / 23.63 oz)

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

for scale

PEN front view

PEN

126 × 75 × 43 mm

393 g (0.87 lb / 13.86 oz)

EOS R6 Mark II is 13mm wider, 24mm taller, and 45mm thicker than PEN.

EOS R6 Mark II is 277 g heavier than PEN.

Depth (front-to-back): 88mm EOS R6 Mark II · 43mm PEN

Back view, to scale

Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.

EOS R6 Mark II back view

EOS R6 Mark II

138 × 98 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

PEN back view

PEN

126 × 75 mm

Top view, to scale

Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.

EOS R6 Mark II top view

EOS R6 Mark II

138 × 88 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

PEN top view

PEN

126 × 43 mm

Sensor size, to scale

EOS R6 Mark II

35.9 × 23.9 mm · Full Frame

858 mm² area

PEN

17.4 × 13 mm · Compact / large-type

226 mm² area

3.8× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

EOS R6 Mark II

Canon RF

105+

native lenses available

45 first-party60 third-party

PEN

✓ more lenses

Micro Four Thirds

130+

native lenses available

60 first-party70 third-party

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseEOS R6 Mark IIPEN
Portrait
8.5Excellent✓ wins
4.0Fair
Sports & Action
9.0Excellent✓ wins
6.0Good
Video & Hybrid
7.5Good✓ wins
3.0Limited
Landscape
7.0Good✓ wins
2.5Limited
Travel
7.5Good
7.5Good
Wildlife
6.5Good✓ wins
5.5Fair
Vlogging
8.0Excellent✓ wins
6.5Good

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

EOS R6 Mark II

  • AF low-light limit

    -6.5 EV vs -3.5 EV — lower is better

  • Subject recognition

    Adds People, Dogs, Cats…

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 138.4, 98.4, 88.4

  • Card types

    Adds SD UHS-II, SD UHS-II

  • AF points / zones

    1053 vs 121 — higher is better

  • RAW buffer depth

    180 frames vs 29 frames — higher is better

  • ISO max (native)

    102,400 vs 25,600 — higher is better

  • Burst (mechanical)

    12 fps vs 5 fps — higher is better

Reasons to choose

PEN

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Human, Dog, Cat

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 125.8, 74.5, 43.3

  • Card types

    Adds SD, SDHC, SDXC

  • Codecs

    Adds MOV, MPEG-4 AVC

  • Weight

    393 g vs 670 g — lower is better

  • EVF magnification

    1.1 × vs 0.76 × — higher is better

Both cameras share

  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • Animal / bird AFBoth support animal / bird af
  • Pre-Capture / Pre-ReleaseBoth support pre-capture / pre-release
  • In-body stabilization (IBIS)Both support in-body stabilization (ibis)
  • Weather sealingBoth support weather sealing
  • EVF refresh rateBoth 120 Hz

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

EOS R6 Mark II

Pros

  • Up to 40fps electronic burst
  • 4K 60p oversampled from 6K
  • Dual Pixel CMOS AF II — superb subject tracking
  • 8-stop IBIS
  • Fully articulating touchscreen

Cons

  • 24.2MP may feel limiting for large prints
  • No CFexpress on base body
  • Short battery life vs. A7 IV

PEN

Pros

  • 393g rangefinder body with built-in 2.36M-dot EVF
  • First PEN with IPX1 dust/splash sealing
  • 5-axis IBIS up to 5.5 stops + 121-point cross-type AF
  • Hi-Res, Live ND, Focus Stacking, HDR via CP button
  • 4K / C4K video, vertical video, 3.5mm mic jack

Cons

  • Micro Four Thirds sensor vs APS-C/FF rivals
  • 4K capped at 30p (C4K 24p only)
  • IPX1 is lighter sealing than OM-5 II / OM-3
  • Single SD slot, no headphone jack

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the EOS R6 Mark II and PEN at major authorized retailers.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Full specifications

= category winner

EOS R6 Mark II
PEN
Resolution
24.2 MP+19%
20.4 MP
Sensor type
Full Frame CMOS
MOS
Sensor size
35.9 × 23.9 mm
17.4 x 13
AA filter
Yes
No
EOS R6 Mark II
PEN
Processor
DIGIC X
TruePic IX
EOS R6 Mark II
PEN
ISO min (native)
100−100 less
200
ISO max (native)
102,400+2 stops
25,600
ISO max (expanded)
204,800
25,600
EOS R6 Mark II
PEN
Shutter type
Mechanical + Electronic
Mechanical Focal Plane Shutter and Electronic Rolling Shutter
Max mechanical speed
1/8000 sec
1/4000
Max electronic speed
1/16000 sec
1/3200

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for portraits, EOS R6 Mark II or PEN?

EOS R6 Mark II scores 8.5/10 versus 4.0/10 for PEN — 24.2MP — solid resolution.

What's the resolution difference between the EOS R6 Mark II and PEN?

EOS R6 Mark II is 24.2 MP and PEN is 20.4 MP, so the EOS R6 Mark II captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the EOS R6 Mark II and PEN have in-body image stabilization?

EOS R6 Mark II has 8-stop in-body image stabilization, while PEN has 5.5-stop in-body image stabilization.

Which shoots faster bursts — the EOS R6 Mark II or the PEN?

EOS R6 Mark II reaches 40 fps electronic. PEN reaches 30 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the EOS R6 Mark II and PEN?

EOS R6 Mark II weighs 670 g and PEN weighs 393 g, so the PEN is 277 g lighter.

Do the EOS R6 Mark II and PEN record 4K video?

EOS R6 Mark II: 4K up to 60p. PEN: 4K up to 30p.

Are the EOS R6 Mark II and PEN weather sealed?

EOS R6 Mark II: Yes. PEN: Yes.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 760 shots (CIPA) for the EOS R6 Mark II and 410 shots for the PEN, giving the EOS R6 Mark II the edge.

How much does each cost?

EOS R6 Mark II launched at $2,499 and PEN at $1,000. The PEN is $1,499 less.

Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.

Add any camera to get a three-way EOS R6 Mark II vs PEN vs X comparison.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed September 2026.

Product images courtesy of Canon and OM System press materials.