Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg
OM-5

OM System

OM-5

Compact weather-sealed MFT for travel and outdoor photography.

$1,199

Launch price

Released Nov 2022

vs

Sony

Alpha 9 III

Global shutter sports flagship with 120fps and zero rolling shutter for pro action.

$5,999

Launch price

Released Jan 2024

Alpha 9 III is 1.3 years newer.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Wins

5categories

OM-5

TravelSports & Action

Wins

11categories

Alpha 9 III

Sports & ActionWildlife

1 categories tied

Which would you choose?

TL;DR — Key differences

OM-5 wins 1 categories·Alpha 9 III wins 4 categories
  • AOM-5 has higher Burst (mechanical) (10 fps vs 0 fps)
  • BAlpha 9 III has higher AF points / zones (759 vs 121)
  • BAlpha 9 III has higher 4K max frame rate (120 fps vs 29.97 fps)
  • BAlpha 9 III has higher Burst (electronic) (120 fps vs 30 fps)
  • BAlpha 9 III has higher EVF resolution (9,437,184 vs 2,360,000)

Key specs at a glance

OM-5Alpha 9 III
Resolution20.4 MP24.6 MP
SensorMFTFull Frame
ISO max25,60025,600
Burst30 fps120 fps
4K29.97 fps120 fps
IBIS6.5-stop8-stop
Weight414 g703 g
Battery310 shots400 shots

Size and weight, to scale

OM-5 front view

OM-5

125 × 85 × 50 mm

414 g (0.91 lb / 14.60 oz)

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

for scale

Alpha 9 III

136 × 97 × 83 mm

703 g (1.55 lb / 24.80 oz)

OM-5 is 11mm narrower, 12mm shorter, and 33mm thinner than Alpha 9 III.

OM-5 is 289 g lighter than Alpha 9 III.

Depth (front-to-back): 50mm OM-5 · 83mm Alpha 9 III

Back view, to scale

Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.

OM-5 back view

OM-5

125 × 85 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

Alpha 9 III

136 × 97 mm

Top view, to scale

Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.

OM-5 top view

OM-5

125 × 50 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

Alpha 9 III

136 × 83 mm

Sensor size, to scale

OM-5

17.4 × 13 mm · Compact / large-type

226 mm² area

Alpha 9 III

35.6 × 23.8 mm · Full Frame

847 mm² area

3.7× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

OM-5

Micro Four Thirds

130+

native lenses available

60 first-party70 third-party

Alpha 9 III

✓ more lenses

Sony E

350+

native lenses available

80 first-party270 third-party

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseOM-5Alpha 9 III
Portrait
4.0Fair
7.5Good✓ wins
Sports & Action
6.5Good
10.0Excellent✓ wins
Video & Hybrid
2.5Limited
8.0Excellent✓ wins
Landscape
2.5Limited
7.0Good✓ wins
Travel
7.0Good
7.0Good
Wildlife
5.5Fair
9.5Excellent✓ wins
Vlogging
5.5Fair
5.5Fair

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

OM-5

  • AF low-light limit

    -8 EV vs -5 EV — lower is better

  • Subject recognition

    Adds People, Birds, Animals…

  • Burst (mechanical)

    10 fps vs 0 fps — higher is better

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 125.3, 85.2, 49.7

  • Card types

    Adds SD, SDHC, SDXC

  • Codecs

    Adds MOV, MPEG-4 AVC

  • Weight

    414 g vs 703 g — lower is better

  • ISO min (native)

    200 vs 250 — lower is better

Reasons to choose

Alpha 9 III

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Human, Animal, Bird…

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 136.1, 96.9, 82.9

  • Card types

    Adds CFexpress Type A, SD UHS-II

  • AF points / zones

    759 vs 121 — higher is better

  • Codecs

    Adds XAVC HS, XAVC S, XAVC S-I…

  • 4K max frame rate

    120 fps vs 29.97 fps — higher is better

  • Burst (electronic)

    120 fps vs 30 fps — higher is better

  • EVF resolution

    9,437,184 vs 2,360,000 — higher is better

Both cameras share

  • ISO max (native)Both 25,600
  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • Animal / bird AFBoth support animal / bird af
  • Pre-Capture / Pre-ReleaseBoth support pre-capture / pre-release
  • In-body stabilization (IBIS)Both support in-body stabilization (ibis)
  • Weather sealingBoth support weather sealing

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

OM-5

Pros

  • Compact
  • IP53 sealing
  • Computational features

Cons

  • No grip extension
  • MFT sensor
  • Single slot

Alpha 9 III

Pros

  • Global shutter 120fps
  • Zero rolling shutter
  • Pro sports AF
  • Pre-capture buffer

Cons

  • 24.6MP only
  • Premium price
  • Battery drain at max speed

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the OM-5 and Alpha 9 III at major authorized retailers.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Full specifications

= category winner

OM-5
Alpha 9 III
Resolution
20.4 MP
24.6 MP+21%
Sensor type
CMOS
Full Frame Global Shutter Exmor RS CMOS
Sensor size
17.4 x 13 mm
35.6 × 23.8 mm
AA filter
No
Yes
OM-5
Alpha 9 III
Processor
TruePic IX
BIONZ XR + AI processing unit
OM-5
Alpha 9 III
ISO min (native)
200−50 less
250
ISO max (native)
25,600
25,600
ISO max (expanded)
25,600
51,200
OM-5
Alpha 9 III
Shutter type
Mechanical Focal Plane Shutter and Electronic Rolling Shutter
Global electronic shutter
Max mechanical speed
1/8000
Max electronic speed
1/32000
1/80000 sec

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for video, OM-5 or Alpha 9 III?

Alpha 9 III scores 8.0/10 versus 2.5/10 for OM-5 — 4K recording.

What's the resolution difference between the OM-5 and Alpha 9 III?

OM-5 is 20.4 MP and Alpha 9 III is 24.6 MP, so the Alpha 9 III captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the OM-5 and Alpha 9 III have in-body image stabilization?

OM-5 has 6.5-stop in-body image stabilization, while Alpha 9 III has 8-stop in-body image stabilization.

Which shoots faster bursts — the OM-5 or the Alpha 9 III?

OM-5 reaches 30 fps electronic. Alpha 9 III reaches 120 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the OM-5 and Alpha 9 III?

OM-5 weighs 414 g and Alpha 9 III weighs 703 g, so the OM-5 is 289 g lighter.

Do the OM-5 and Alpha 9 III record 4K video?

OM-5: 4K up to 29.97p. Alpha 9 III: 4K up to 120p.

Are the OM-5 and Alpha 9 III weather sealed?

OM-5: Yes. Alpha 9 III: Yes.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 310 shots (CIPA) for the OM-5 and 400 shots for the Alpha 9 III, giving the Alpha 9 III the edge.

How much does each cost?

OM-5 launched at $1,199 and Alpha 9 III at $5,999. The OM-5 is $4,800 less.

Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.

Add any camera to get a three-way OM-5 vs Alpha 9 III vs X comparison.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed July 2026.

Product images courtesy of OM System and Sony press materials.