Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg Compare

OM System

OM-D E-M1 Mark II

Pro MFT body with 60fps stills and rugged build before the OM-1 era.

$1,699

Released Nov 2016

vs
Alpha 7 IV

Sony

Alpha 7 IV

33MP hybrid all-rounder with 10-bit 4K 60p and AI-powered subject tracking.

$2,499

Released Oct 2021

Alpha 7 IV is 5 years newer.

Wins

8categories

OM-D E-M1 Mark II

WildlifeSports & Action

Wins

5categories

Alpha 7 IV

PortraitWildlife

5 categories tied

TL;DR — Key differences

OM-D E-M1 Mark II wins 1 categories·Alpha 7 IV wins 4 categories
  • BAlpha 7 IV has higher RAW buffer depth (828 frames vs 120 frames)
  • BAlpha 7 IV has higher Max video bit rate (600 Mbps vs 150 Mbps)
  • BAlpha 7 IV has higher ISO max (native) (51,200 vs 25,600)
  • AOM-D E-M1 Mark II has higher Burst (electronic) (20 fps vs 10 fps)
  • BAlpha 7 IV has higher Resolution (33 MP vs 20.4 MP)

Key specs at a glance

OM-D E-M1 Mark IIAlpha 7 IV
Resolution20.4 MP33 MP
SensorMFTFull Frame
ISO max25,60051,200
Burst20 fps10 fps
4K60 fps60 fps
IBIS7-stop5.5-stop
Weight580 g658 g
Battery640 shots580 shots

Size and weight, to scale

OM-D E-M1 Mark II

134 × 91 × 72 mm

580 g (1.28 lb / 20.46 oz)

Alpha 7 IV front view

Alpha 7 IV

131 × 96 × 80 mm

658 g (1.45 lb / 23.21 oz)

OM-D E-M1 Mark II is 5mm shorter and 8mm thinner than Alpha 7 IV but it is also 3mm wider.

OM-D E-M1 Mark II is 78 g lighter than Alpha 7 IV.

Depth (front-to-back): 72mm OM-D E-M1 Mark II · 80mm Alpha 7 IV

Sensor size, to scale

OM-D E-M1 Mark II

17.3 × 13 mm · Micro Four Thirds

225 mm² area

Alpha 7 IV

35.9 × 23.9 mm · Full Frame

858 mm² area

3.8× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

OM-D E-M1 Mark II

Micro Four Thirds

130+

native lenses available

60 first-party70 third-party

Alpha 7 IV

✓ more lenses

Sony E

350+

native lenses available

80 first-party270 third-party

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseOM-D E-M1 Mark IIAlpha 7 IV
Portrait
4.0Fair
9.0Excellent✓ wins
Sports & Action
8.0Excellent✓ wins
6.0Good
Video & Hybrid
6.0Good
7.5Good✓ wins
Landscape
3.5Limited
7.5Good✓ wins
Travel
7.5Good✓ wins
7.0Good
Wildlife
9.0Excellent✓ wins
8.0Excellent
Vlogging
7.0Good
8.0Excellent✓ wins

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

OM-D E-M1 Mark II

  • AF low-light limit

    -7 EV vs -4 EV — lower is better

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 134, 91, 72

  • Burst (electronic)

    20 fps vs 10 fps — higher is better

  • Pre-Capture / Pre-Release

    Only OM-D E-M1 Mark II supports it

  • AF points / zones

    1053 vs 759 — higher is better

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Vehicle

  • IBIS effectiveness

    7 stops vs 5.5 stops — higher is better

  • Weight

    580 g vs 658 g — lower is better

Reasons to choose

Alpha 7 IV

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 131.3, 96.4, 79.8

  • RAW buffer depth

    828 frames vs 120 frames — higher is better

  • Max video bit rate

    600 Mbps vs 150 Mbps — higher is better

  • Codecs

    Adds XAVC HS, XAVC S, XAVC S-I

  • ISO max (native)

    51,200 vs 25,600 — higher is better

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Insect, Car/Train, Airplane

  • Internal RAW video

    Only Alpha 7 IV supports it

  • Card types

    Adds CFexpress Type A

Both cameras share

  • AA filterBoth support aa filter
  • ISO min (native)Both 100
  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • Animal / bird AFBoth support animal / bird af
  • 4K max frame rateBoth 60 fps
  • In-body stabilizationBoth support in-body stabilization

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

OM-D E-M1 Mark II

Pros

  • 60fps stills
  • Pro build
  • Great wildlife MFT

Cons

  • Superseded
  • 20MP
  • MFT sensor

Alpha 7 IV

Pros

  • 33MP — more detail for cropping and print
  • 10-bit 4K 60p (Super35 crop) / 4K 30p full-frame
  • Full-size HDMI port
  • 759 phase-detect AF points

Cons

  • 4K 60p requires Super35 crop
  • 10fps burst lags behind R6 II at 40fps
  • Complex menu system

Full specifications

= category winner

OM-D E-M1 Mark II
Alpha 7 IV
Resolution
20.4 MP
33 MP+62%
Sensor type
Four Thirds Live MOS
Full Frame Exmor R CMOS
Sensor size
17.3 × 13.0 mm
35.9 × 23.9 mm
AA filter
Yes
Yes
OM-D E-M1 Mark II
Alpha 7 IV
AF system
Cross-type PDAF
Fast Hybrid AF (phase-detection / contrast-detection)
AF points / zones
1053+39%
759
AF frame coverage
100 %+6%
94 %
AF low-light limit
-7 EV
-4 EV
Eye AF
Yes
Yes
Animal / bird AF
Yes
Yes
Subject recognition
Human, Animal, Bird, Vehicle
Human, Animal, Bird, Insect, Car/Train, Airplane
OM-D E-M1 Mark II
Alpha 7 IV
Burst (mechanical)
8 fps
10 fps+25%
Burst (electronic)
20 fps2× more
10 fps
Pre-Capture / Pre-Release
Yes
No
RAW buffer depth
120 frames
828 frames6.9× more
OM-D E-M1 Mark II
Alpha 7 IV
Max resolution
4K UHD
4K UHD
4K max frame rate
60 fps
60 fps
Max video bit rate
150 Mbps
600 Mbps4× more
Internal RAW video
No
Yes
Log profile
Standard profiles
S-Log3 / HLG / S-Cinetone
Codecs
H.265, H.264
XAVC HS, XAVC S, XAVC S-I, H.265, H.264
OM-D E-M1 Mark II
Alpha 7 IV
Weight
580 g−78 g less
658 g
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
134 × 91 × 72 mm
131.3 × 96.4 × 79.8 mm
Weather sealing
Yes
Yes

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for portraits, OM-D E-M1 Mark II or Alpha 7 IV?

Alpha 7 IV scores 9.0/10 versus 4.0/10 for OM-D E-M1 Mark II — 33MP — ample resolution for portraits.

What's the resolution difference between the OM-D E-M1 Mark II and Alpha 7 IV?

OM-D E-M1 Mark II is 20.4 MP and Alpha 7 IV is 33 MP, so the Alpha 7 IV captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the OM-D E-M1 Mark II and Alpha 7 IV have in-body image stabilization?

OM-D E-M1 Mark II has 7-stop in-body image stabilization, while alpha 7 IV has 5.5-stop in-body image stabilization.

Which shoots faster bursts — the OM-D E-M1 Mark II or the Alpha 7 IV?

OM-D E-M1 Mark II reaches 20 fps electronic. Alpha 7 IV reaches 10 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the OM-D E-M1 Mark II and Alpha 7 IV?

OM-D E-M1 Mark II weighs 580 g and Alpha 7 IV weighs 658 g, so the OM-D E-M1 Mark II is 78 g lighter.

Do the OM-D E-M1 Mark II and Alpha 7 IV record 4K video?

OM-D E-M1 Mark II: 4K up to 60p. Alpha 7 IV: 4K up to 60p.

Are the OM-D E-M1 Mark II and Alpha 7 IV weather sealed?

OM-D E-M1 Mark II: Yes. Alpha 7 IV: Yes.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 640 shots (CIPA) for the OM-D E-M1 Mark II and 580 shots for the Alpha 7 IV, giving the OM-D E-M1 Mark II the edge.

How much does each cost?

OM-D E-M1 Mark II launched at $1,699 and Alpha 7 IV at $2,499. The OM-D E-M1 Mark II is $800 less.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed May 2026.

Product images courtesy of OM System and Sony press materials.