Canon
EOS R6 V
Video-first 32.5MP full-frame EOS V-series body with 7K RAW 60p, 4K 120p, active cooling, and Canon RF mount.
$2,499
Released May 2026
OM System
OM-D E-M1 Mark II
Pro MFT body with 60fps stills and rugged build before the OM-1 era.
$1,699
Released Nov 2016
EOS R6 V is 9.5 years newer.
Wins
EOS R6 V
Wins
OM-D E-M1 Mark II
4 categories tied
TL;DR — Key differences
- AEOS R6 V has higher Max video bit rate (2600 Mbps vs 150 Mbps)
- AEOS R6 V has higher AF points / zones (6097 vs 1053)
- AEOS R6 V has higher ISO max (native) (64,000 vs 25,600)
- AEOS R6 V has higher Burst (electronic) (40 fps vs 20 fps)
- AEOS R6 V has higher 4K max frame rate (120 fps vs 60 fps)
Key specs at a glance
Size and weight, to scale
EOS R6 V
142 × 83 × 80 mm
688 g (1.52 lb / 24.27 oz)
OM-D E-M1 Mark II
134 × 91 × 72 mm
580 g (1.28 lb / 20.46 oz)
EOS R6 V is 8mm shorter than OM-D E-M1 Mark II but it is also 8mm wider and 8mm thicker.
EOS R6 V is 108 g heavier than OM-D E-M1 Mark II.
Depth (front-to-back): 80mm EOS R6 V · 72mm OM-D E-M1 Mark II
Back view, to scale
Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.
EOS R6 V
142 × 83 mm
OM-D E-M1 Mark II
134 × 91 mm
Top view, to scale
Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.
EOS R6 V
142 × 80 mm
OM-D E-M1 Mark II
134 × 72 mm
Sensor size, to scale
EOS R6 V
35.9 × 23.9 mm · Full Frame
858 mm² area
OM-D E-M1 Mark II
17.3 × 13 mm · Micro Four Thirds
225 mm² area
3.8× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.
Lens ecosystem
Native lens selection
EOS R6 V
Canon RF
105+
native lenses available
OM-D E-M1 Mark II
✓ more lensesMicro Four Thirds
130+
native lenses available
Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.
Use-case scoring
Which one for what?
Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class
Why pick one over the other
Reasons to choose
EOS R6 V
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
Adds 141.8, 83.3, 79.7
Max video bit rate
2600 Mbps vs 150 Mbps — higher is better
AF points / zones
6097 vs 1053 — higher is better
ISO max (native)
64,000 vs 25,600 — higher is better
Codecs
Adds RAW, XF-HEVC S, XF-AVC S
Burst (electronic)
40 fps vs 20 fps — higher is better
4K max frame rate
120 fps vs 60 fps — higher is better
Internal RAW video
Only EOS R6 V supports it
Reasons to choose
OM-D E-M1 Mark II
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
Adds 134, 91, 72
AF low-light limit
-7 EV vs -6.5 EV — lower is better
Weight
580 g vs 688 g — lower is better
Both cameras share
- ✓AA filter — Both support aa filter
- ✓ISO min (native) — Both 100
- ✓AF frame coverage — Both 100 %
- ✓Eye AF — Both support eye af
- ✓Animal / bird AF — Both support animal / bird af
- ✓Pre-Capture / Pre-Release — Both support pre-capture / pre-release
Pros & cons at a glance
Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.
EOS R6 V
Pros
- ✓7K RAW 60p and 7K Open Gate recording
- ✓4K DCI/UHD 120p with no crop
- ✓Dual Pixel CMOS AF II with people, animal, and vehicle detection
- ✓Active cooling for long-form recording
- ✓Full-size HDMI and dual CFexpress/SD card recording
Cons
- –No built-in EVF
- –Single CFexpress Type B slot plus one SD slot
- –Video-first body may be less ideal for stills-first shooters
- –Battery grip not supported
OM-D E-M1 Mark II
Pros
- ✓60fps stills
- ✓Pro build
- ✓Great wildlife MFT
Cons
- –Superseded
- –20MP
- –MFT sensor
Full specifications
✓ = category winner
Frequently asked
Quick answers generated from verified specs.
Which is better for portraits, EOS R6 V or OM-D E-M1 Mark II?
EOS R6 V scores 8.0/10 versus 4.0/10 for OM-D E-M1 Mark II — 32.5MP — ample resolution for portraits.
What's the resolution difference between the EOS R6 V and OM-D E-M1 Mark II?
EOS R6 V is 32.5 MP and OM-D E-M1 Mark II is 20.4 MP, so the EOS R6 V captures more detail for cropping and large prints.
Do the EOS R6 V and OM-D E-M1 Mark II have in-body image stabilization?
EOS R6 V has 7.5-stop in-body image stabilization, while oM-D E-M1 Mark II has 7-stop in-body image stabilization.
Which shoots faster bursts — the EOS R6 V or the OM-D E-M1 Mark II?
EOS R6 V reaches 40 fps electronic. OM-D E-M1 Mark II reaches 20 fps electronic.
What's the weight difference between the EOS R6 V and OM-D E-M1 Mark II?
EOS R6 V weighs 688 g and OM-D E-M1 Mark II weighs 580 g, so the OM-D E-M1 Mark II is 108 g lighter.
Do the EOS R6 V and OM-D E-M1 Mark II record 4K video?
EOS R6 V: 4K up to 120p. OM-D E-M1 Mark II: 4K up to 60p.
Are the EOS R6 V and OM-D E-M1 Mark II weather sealed?
EOS R6 V: Yes. OM-D E-M1 Mark II: Yes.
Which has better battery life?
Rated battery life is 640 shots (CIPA) for the EOS R6 V and 640 shots for the OM-D E-M1 Mark II, giving the OM-D E-M1 Mark II the edge.
How much does each cost?
EOS R6 V launched at $2,499 and OM-D E-M1 Mark II at $1,699. The OM-D E-M1 Mark II is $800 less.
Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed May 2026.
Product images courtesy of Canon and OM System press materials.