Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg

OM System

OM-D E-M1 Mark III

Previous Olympus flagship still capable for wildlife.

$1,799

Launch price

Released Feb 2020

vs
Alpha 7 V

Sony

Alpha 7 V

33MP partially stacked Exmor RS hybrid with BIONZ XR2 AI, 30fps blackout-free burst, 7.5-stop IBIS, and 4K 60p oversampled from 7K.

$2,899

Launch price

Released Dec 2025

Alpha 7 V is 5.8 years newer.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Wins

7categories

OM-D E-M1 Mark III

WildlifeSports & Action

Wins

7categories

Alpha 7 V

WildlifePortrait

4 categories tied

TL;DR — Key differences

OM-D E-M1 Mark III wins 0 categories·Alpha 7 V wins 5 categories
  • BAlpha 7 V has higher Max video bit rate (600 Mbps vs 150 Mbps)
  • BAlpha 7 V has higher ISO max (native) (51,200 vs 25,600)
  • BAlpha 7 V has higher 4K max frame rate (120 fps vs 60 fps)
  • BAlpha 7 V has higher Resolution (33 MP vs 20.4 MP)
  • BAlpha 7 V has higher Burst (electronic) (30 fps vs 20 fps)

Key specs at a glance

OM-D E-M1 Mark IIIAlpha 7 V
Resolution20.4 MP33 MP
SensorMFTFull Frame
ISO max25,60051,200
Burst20 fps30 fps
4K60 fps120 fps
IBIS7-stop7.5-stop
Weight580 g695 g
Battery640 shots630 shots

Size and weight, to scale

OM-D E-M1 Mark III

134 × 91 × 72 mm

580 g (1.28 lb / 20.46 oz)

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

for scale

Alpha 7 V front view

Alpha 7 V

130 × 96 × 82 mm

695 g (1.53 lb / 24.52 oz)

OM-D E-M1 Mark III is 5mm shorter and 10mm thinner than Alpha 7 V but it is also 4mm wider.

OM-D E-M1 Mark III is 115 g lighter than Alpha 7 V.

Depth (front-to-back): 72mm OM-D E-M1 Mark III · 82mm Alpha 7 V

Back view, to scale

Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.

OM-D E-M1 Mark III

134 × 91 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

Alpha 7 V back view

Alpha 7 V

130 × 96 mm

Top view, to scale

Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.

OM-D E-M1 Mark III

134 × 72 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

Alpha 7 V top view

Alpha 7 V

130 × 82 mm

Sensor size, to scale

OM-D E-M1 Mark III

17.3 × 13 mm · Micro Four Thirds

225 mm² area

Alpha 7 V

35.9 × 23.9 mm · Full Frame

858 mm² area

3.8× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

OM-D E-M1 Mark III

Micro Four Thirds

130+

native lenses available

60 first-party70 third-party

Alpha 7 V

✓ more lenses

Sony E

350+

native lenses available

80 first-party270 third-party

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseOM-D E-M1 Mark IIIAlpha 7 V
Portrait
4.0Fair
8.0Excellent✓ wins
Sports & Action
8.0Excellent
8.0Excellent
Video & Hybrid
6.0Good
8.0Excellent✓ wins
Landscape
3.5Limited
7.5Good✓ wins
Travel
7.5Good
7.5Good
Wildlife
9.0Excellent
10.0Excellent✓ wins
Vlogging
7.0Good✓ wins
5.5Fair

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

OM-D E-M1 Mark III

  • AF low-light limit

    -7 EV vs -4 EV — lower is better

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 134, 91, 72

  • AF points / zones

    1053 vs 759 — higher is better

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Vehicle

  • RAW buffer depth

    120 frames vs 95 frames — higher is better

  • Weight

    580 g vs 695 g — lower is better

  • AF frame coverage

    100 % vs 94 % — higher is better

  • Battery life (CIPA)

    640 shots vs 630 shots — higher is better

Reasons to choose

Alpha 7 V

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 130.3, 96.4, 82.4

  • Max video bit rate

    600 Mbps vs 150 Mbps — higher is better

  • Codecs

    Adds XAVC HS, XAVC S, XAVC S-I

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Insect, Car, Train…

  • ISO max (native)

    51,200 vs 25,600 — higher is better

  • 4K max frame rate

    120 fps vs 60 fps — higher is better

  • Internal RAW video

    Only Alpha 7 V supports it

  • Card types

    Adds CFexpress Type A / SD UHS-II

Both cameras share

  • AA filterBoth support aa filter
  • ISO min (native)Both 100
  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • Animal / bird AFBoth support animal / bird af
  • Pre-Capture / Pre-ReleaseBoth support pre-capture / pre-release
  • In-body stabilizationBoth support in-body stabilization

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

OM-D E-M1 Mark III

Pros

  • Pro build
  • 60fps mode
  • Great IBIS

Cons

  • Superseded
  • MFT
  • Older AF

Alpha 7 V

Pros

  • 33MP partially stacked sensor — ~4.5× faster readout than α7 IV
  • Blackout-free 30 fps with full AF/AE (electronic shutter)
  • 7.5-stop central / 6.5-stop peripheral IBIS (CIPA 2024)
  • 759-point phase-detect AF down to EV -4 with AI subject recognition
  • 7K oversampled 4K 60p (full-frame, no pixel binning) + 4K 120p
  • Pre-Capture and dual USB-C (10 Gbps + USB 2.0)
  • Up to 16 stops dynamic range

Cons

  • Premium price vs α7 IV
  • 4K 120p typically requires APS-C / Super 35 crop
  • Heavier than α7 IV (695 g vs 659 g with battery)
  • Complex menu and feature set

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the OM-D E-M1 Mark III and Alpha 7 V at major authorized retailers.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Full specifications

= category winner

OM-D E-M1 Mark III
Alpha 7 V
Resolution
20.4 MP
33 MP+62%
Sensor type
Four Thirds Live MOS
Full Frame Exmor RS CMOS (partially stacked)
Sensor size
17.3 × 13.0 mm
35.9 × 23.9 mm
AA filter
Yes
Yes
OM-D E-M1 Mark III
Alpha 7 V
Processor
TruePic X
BIONZ XR2 + AI processing unit
OM-D E-M1 Mark III
Alpha 7 V
ISO min (native)
100
100
ISO max (native)
25,600
51,200+1 stop
ISO max (expanded)
102,400
204,800
OM-D E-M1 Mark III
Alpha 7 V
Shutter type
Mechanical + Electronic
Mechanical + Electronic
Max mechanical speed
1/8000 sec
1/8000 sec
Max electronic speed
1/16000 sec
1/16000 sec
OM-D E-M1 Mark III
Alpha 7 V
AF system
Cross-type PDAF
Fast Hybrid AF (phase-detection / contrast-detection)
AF points / zones
1053+39%
759
AF frame coverage
100 %+6%
94 %
AF low-light limit
-7 EV
-4 EV
Eye AF
Yes
Yes
Animal / bird AF
Yes
Yes
Subject recognition
Human, Animal, Bird, Vehicle
Human, Animal, Bird, Insect, Car, Train, Airplane

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for portraits, OM-D E-M1 Mark III or Alpha 7 V?

Alpha 7 V scores 8.0/10 versus 4.0/10 for OM-D E-M1 Mark III — 33MP — ample resolution for portraits.

What's the resolution difference between the OM-D E-M1 Mark III and Alpha 7 V?

OM-D E-M1 Mark III is 20.4 MP and Alpha 7 V is 33 MP, so the Alpha 7 V captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the OM-D E-M1 Mark III and Alpha 7 V have in-body image stabilization?

OM-D E-M1 Mark III has 7-stop in-body image stabilization, while alpha 7 V has 7.5-stop in-body image stabilization.

Which shoots faster bursts — the OM-D E-M1 Mark III or the Alpha 7 V?

OM-D E-M1 Mark III reaches 20 fps electronic. Alpha 7 V reaches 30 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the OM-D E-M1 Mark III and Alpha 7 V?

OM-D E-M1 Mark III weighs 580 g and Alpha 7 V weighs 695 g, so the OM-D E-M1 Mark III is 115 g lighter.

Do the OM-D E-M1 Mark III and Alpha 7 V record 4K video?

OM-D E-M1 Mark III: 4K up to 60p. Alpha 7 V: 4K up to 120p.

Are the OM-D E-M1 Mark III and Alpha 7 V weather sealed?

OM-D E-M1 Mark III: Yes. Alpha 7 V: Yes.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 640 shots (CIPA) for the OM-D E-M1 Mark III and 630 shots for the Alpha 7 V, giving the OM-D E-M1 Mark III the edge.

How much does each cost?

OM-D E-M1 Mark III launched at $1,799 and Alpha 7 V at $2,899. The OM-D E-M1 Mark III is $1,100 less.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed June 2026.

Product images courtesy of OM System and Sony press materials.