Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg Compare
EOS R6 V

Canon

EOS R6 V

Video-first 32.5MP full-frame EOS V-series body with 7K RAW 60p, 4K 120p, active cooling, and Canon RF mount.

$2,499

Released May 2026

vs

OM System

OM-D E-M1 Mark III

Previous Olympus flagship still capable for wildlife.

$1,799

Released Feb 2020

EOS R6 V is 6.3 years newer.

Wins

9categories

EOS R6 V

WildlifeSports & Action

Wins

2categories

OM-D E-M1 Mark III

WildlifeSports & Action

4 categories tied

Check current prices

Compare today's discounts, bundled lenses, and refurbished offers at the major authorized retailers for both cameras:

As an affiliate, Cameraegg may earn from qualifying purchases at no extra cost to you.

TL;DR — Key differences

EOS R6 V wins 5 categories·OM-D E-M1 Mark III wins 0 categories
  • AEOS R6 V has higher Max video bit rate (2600 Mbps vs 150 Mbps)
  • AEOS R6 V has higher AF points / zones (6097 vs 1053)
  • AEOS R6 V has higher ISO max (native) (64,000 vs 25,600)
  • AEOS R6 V has higher Burst (electronic) (40 fps vs 20 fps)
  • AEOS R6 V has higher 4K max frame rate (120 fps vs 60 fps)

Key specs at a glance

EOS R6 VOM-D E-M1 Mark III
Resolution32.5 MP20.4 MP
SensorFull FrameMFT
ISO max64,00025,600
Burst40 fps20 fps
4K120 fps60 fps
IBIS7.5-stop7-stop
Weight688 g580 g
Battery640 shots640 shots

Size and weight, to scale

EOS R6 V front view

EOS R6 V

142 × 83 × 80 mm

688 g (1.52 lb / 24.27 oz)

OM-D E-M1 Mark III

134 × 91 × 72 mm

580 g (1.28 lb / 20.46 oz)

EOS R6 V is 8mm shorter than OM-D E-M1 Mark III but it is also 8mm wider and 8mm thicker.

EOS R6 V is 108 g heavier than OM-D E-M1 Mark III.

Depth (front-to-back): 80mm EOS R6 V · 72mm OM-D E-M1 Mark III

Back view, to scale

Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.

EOS R6 V back view

EOS R6 V

142 × 83 mm

OM-D E-M1 Mark III

134 × 91 mm

Top view, to scale

Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.

EOS R6 V top view

EOS R6 V

142 × 80 mm

OM-D E-M1 Mark III

134 × 72 mm

Sensor size, to scale

EOS R6 V

35.9 × 23.9 mm · Full Frame

858 mm² area

OM-D E-M1 Mark III

17.3 × 13 mm · Micro Four Thirds

225 mm² area

3.8× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

EOS R6 V

Canon RF

105+

native lenses available

45 first-party60 third-party

OM-D E-M1 Mark III

✓ more lenses

Micro Four Thirds

130+

native lenses available

60 first-party70 third-party

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseEOS R6 VOM-D E-M1 Mark III
Portrait
8.0Excellent✓ wins
4.0Fair
Sports & Action
8.5Excellent✓ wins
8.0Excellent
Video & Hybrid
6.5Good✓ wins
6.0Good
Landscape
7.5Good✓ wins
3.5Limited
Travel
7.5Good
7.5Good
Wildlife
10.0Excellent✓ wins
9.0Excellent
Vlogging
5.5Fair
7.0Good✓ wins

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

EOS R6 V

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 141.8, 83.3, 79.7

  • Max video bit rate

    2600 Mbps vs 150 Mbps — higher is better

  • AF points / zones

    6097 vs 1053 — higher is better

  • ISO max (native)

    64,000 vs 25,600 — higher is better

  • Codecs

    Adds RAW, XF-HEVC S, XF-AVC S

  • Burst (electronic)

    40 fps vs 20 fps — higher is better

  • 4K max frame rate

    120 fps vs 60 fps — higher is better

  • Internal RAW video

    Only EOS R6 V supports it

Reasons to choose

OM-D E-M1 Mark III

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 134, 91, 72

  • AF low-light limit

    -7 EV vs -6.5 EV — lower is better

  • Weight

    580 g vs 688 g — lower is better

Both cameras share

  • AA filterBoth support aa filter
  • ISO min (native)Both 100
  • AF frame coverageBoth 100 %
  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • Animal / bird AFBoth support animal / bird af
  • Pre-Capture / Pre-ReleaseBoth support pre-capture / pre-release

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

EOS R6 V

Pros

  • 7K RAW 60p and 7K Open Gate recording
  • 4K DCI/UHD 120p with no crop
  • Dual Pixel CMOS AF II with people, animal, and vehicle detection
  • Active cooling for long-form recording
  • Full-size HDMI and dual CFexpress/SD card recording

Cons

  • No built-in EVF
  • Single CFexpress Type B slot plus one SD slot
  • Video-first body may be less ideal for stills-first shooters
  • Battery grip not supported

OM-D E-M1 Mark III

Pros

  • Pro build
  • 60fps mode
  • Great IBIS

Cons

  • Superseded
  • MFT
  • Older AF

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the EOS R6 V and OM-D E-M1 Mark III at major authorized retailers.

Full specifications

= category winner

EOS R6 V
OM-D E-M1 Mark III
Resolution
32.5 MP+59%
20.4 MP
Sensor type
Full Frame CMOS
Four Thirds Live MOS
Sensor size
35.9 × 23.9 mm
17.3 × 13.0 mm
AA filter
Yes
Yes
EOS R6 V
OM-D E-M1 Mark III
AF system
Dual Pixel CMOS AF II
Cross-type PDAF
AF points / zones
60975.8× more
1053
AF frame coverage
100 %
100 %
AF low-light limit
-6.5 EV
-7 EV
Eye AF
Yes
Yes
Animal / bird AF
Yes
Yes
Subject recognition
Human, Animal, Bird, Horse, Vehicle, Airplane, Train
Human, Animal, Bird, Vehicle
EOS R6 V
OM-D E-M1 Mark III
Burst (mechanical)
12 fps+50%
8 fps
Burst (electronic)
40 fps2× more
20 fps
Pre-Capture / Pre-Release
Yes
Yes
RAW buffer depth
150 frames+25%
120 frames
EOS R6 V
OM-D E-M1 Mark III
Max resolution
7K RAW / 7K Open Gate
4K UHD
4K max frame rate
120 fps2× more
60 fps
Max video bit rate
2600 Mbps17.3× more
150 Mbps
Internal RAW video
Yes
No
Log profile
Canon Log 2 / Canon Log 3
Standard profiles
Codecs
RAW, XF-HEVC S, XF-AVC S, H.265, H.264
H.265, H.264
EOS R6 V
OM-D E-M1 Mark III
Weight
688 g
580 g−108 g less
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
141.8 × 83.3 × 79.7 mm
134 × 91 × 72 mm
Weather sealing
Yes
Yes

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for portraits, EOS R6 V or OM-D E-M1 Mark III?

EOS R6 V scores 8.0/10 versus 4.0/10 for OM-D E-M1 Mark III — 32.5MP — ample resolution for portraits.

What's the resolution difference between the EOS R6 V and OM-D E-M1 Mark III?

EOS R6 V is 32.5 MP and OM-D E-M1 Mark III is 20.4 MP, so the EOS R6 V captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the EOS R6 V and OM-D E-M1 Mark III have in-body image stabilization?

EOS R6 V has 7.5-stop in-body image stabilization, while oM-D E-M1 Mark III has 7-stop in-body image stabilization.

Which shoots faster bursts — the EOS R6 V or the OM-D E-M1 Mark III?

EOS R6 V reaches 40 fps electronic. OM-D E-M1 Mark III reaches 20 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the EOS R6 V and OM-D E-M1 Mark III?

EOS R6 V weighs 688 g and OM-D E-M1 Mark III weighs 580 g, so the OM-D E-M1 Mark III is 108 g lighter.

Do the EOS R6 V and OM-D E-M1 Mark III record 4K video?

EOS R6 V: 4K up to 120p. OM-D E-M1 Mark III: 4K up to 60p.

Are the EOS R6 V and OM-D E-M1 Mark III weather sealed?

EOS R6 V: Yes. OM-D E-M1 Mark III: Yes.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 640 shots (CIPA) for the EOS R6 V and 640 shots for the OM-D E-M1 Mark III, giving the OM-D E-M1 Mark III the edge.

How much does each cost?

EOS R6 V launched at $2,499 and OM-D E-M1 Mark III at $1,799. The OM-D E-M1 Mark III is $700 less.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed May 2026.

Product images courtesy of Canon and OM System press materials.