Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg Compare

OM System

OM-D E-M10 Mark III

Entry MFT with IBIS and approachable design for beginners.

$649

Released Aug 2017

vs
Alpha 7R VI

Sony

Alpha 7R VI

66.8MP fully-stacked full-frame high-resolution body with 30fps bursts, 8K 30p, 4K 120p, and Sony's new BIONZ XR2 engine.

$4,499

Released Jun 2026

Alpha 7R VI is 8.8 years newer.

Wins

4categories

OM-D E-M10 Mark III

Wins

9categories

Alpha 7R VI

PortraitVideo & Hybrid

1 categories tied

TL;DR — Key differences

OM-D E-M10 Mark III wins 0 categories·Alpha 7R VI wins 5 categories
  • BAlpha 7R VI has higher Resolution (66.8 MP vs 16 MP)
  • BAlpha 7R VI has higher Max video bit rate (600 Mbps vs 150 Mbps)
  • BAlpha 7R VI has higher EVF resolution (9,437,184 vs 2,360,000)
  • BAlpha 7R VI has higher Burst (electronic) (30 fps vs 11 fps)
  • BAlpha 7R VI has higher RAW buffer depth (150 frames vs 60 frames)

Key specs at a glance

OM-D E-M10 Mark IIIAlpha 7R VI
Resolution16 MP66.8 MP
SensorMFTFull Frame
ISO max25,60032,000
Burst11 fps30 fps
4K60 fps120 fps
IBISNoYes
Weight580 g713 g
Battery640 shots600 shots

Size and weight, to scale

OM-D E-M10 Mark III

134 × 91 × 72 mm

580 g (1.28 lb / 20.46 oz)

Alpha 7R VI front view

Alpha 7R VI

133 × 97 × 83 mm

713 g (1.57 lb / 25.15 oz)

OM-D E-M10 Mark III is 6mm shorter and 11mm thinner than Alpha 7R VI but it is also 1mm wider.

OM-D E-M10 Mark III is 133 g lighter than Alpha 7R VI.

Depth (front-to-back): 72mm OM-D E-M10 Mark III · 83mm Alpha 7R VI

Back view, to scale

Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.

OM-D E-M10 Mark III

134 × 91 mm

Alpha 7R VI back view

Alpha 7R VI

133 × 97 mm

Top view, to scale

Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.

OM-D E-M10 Mark III

134 × 72 mm

Alpha 7R VI top view

Alpha 7R VI

133 × 83 mm

Sensor size, to scale

OM-D E-M10 Mark III

17.3 × 13 mm · Micro Four Thirds

225 mm² area

Alpha 7R VI

35.9 × 24 mm · Full Frame

862 mm² area

3.8× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

OM-D E-M10 Mark III

Micro Four Thirds

130+

native lenses available

60 first-party70 third-party

Alpha 7R VI

✓ more lenses

Sony E

350+

native lenses available

80 first-party270 third-party

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseOM-D E-M10 Mark IIIAlpha 7R VI
Portrait
3.0Limited
8.5Excellent✓ wins
Sports & Action
4.5Fair
5.5Fair✓ wins
Video & Hybrid
4.5Fair
8.0Excellent✓ wins
Landscape
0.0Limited
7.5Good✓ wins
Travel
5.0Fair
5.0Fair
Wildlife
5.0Fair
6.5Good✓ wins
Vlogging
5.5Fair
5.5Fair

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

OM-D E-M10 Mark III

  • AF low-light limit

    -7 EV vs -6 EV — lower is better

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 134, 91, 72

  • Card types

    Adds SD UHS-II

  • AA filter

    Only OM-D E-M10 Mark III supports it

  • AF points / zones

    1053 vs 759 — higher is better

  • Weight

    580 g vs 713 g — lower is better

  • Battery life (CIPA)

    640 shots vs 600 shots — higher is better

Reasons to choose

Alpha 7R VI

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 132.7, 96.9, 82.9

  • Card types

    Adds CFexpress Type A, SDXC UHS-II

  • Resolution

    66.8 MP vs 16 MP — higher is better

  • Max video bit rate

    600 Mbps vs 150 Mbps — higher is better

  • EVF resolution

    9,437,184 vs 2,360,000 — higher is better

  • Burst (electronic)

    30 fps vs 11 fps — higher is better

  • RAW buffer depth

    150 frames vs 60 frames — higher is better

  • Codecs

    Adds XAVC HS, XAVC S, XAVC S-I

Both cameras share

  • ISO min (native)Both 100
  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • Wi-FiBoth support wi-fi
  • BluetoothBoth support bluetooth
  • Microphone jack (3.5mm)Both support microphone jack (3.5mm)

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

OM-D E-M10 Mark III

Pros

  • IBIS at entry price
  • Compact
  • Easy menus

Cons

  • 16MP
  • No weather sealing
  • Older

Alpha 7R VI

Pros

  • 66.8MP fully-stacked Exmor RS sensor
  • 30fps blackout-free electronic burst
  • 8K 30p and 4K 120p video
  • 8.5-stop in-body stabilization
  • 9.44M-dot HDR OLED EVF

Cons

  • Very expensive
  • Large files demand fast cards and storage
  • 8K workflow can be heavy

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the OM-D E-M10 Mark III and Alpha 7R VI at major authorized retailers.

Full specifications

= category winner

OM-D E-M10 Mark III
Alpha 7R VI
Resolution
16 MP
66.8 MP4.2× more
Sensor type
Four Thirds Live MOS
Full-Frame Stacked CMOS
Sensor size
17.3 × 13.0 mm
35.9 × 24.0 mm
AA filter
Yes
No
OM-D E-M10 Mark III
Alpha 7R VI
AF system
Cross-type PDAF
Contrast Detection / Phase Detection
AF points / zones
1053+39%
759
AF frame coverage
100 %
AF low-light limit
-7 EV
-6 EV
Eye AF
Yes
Yes
Animal / bird AF
No
Yes
Subject recognition
Human, Animal, Bird, Vehicle
Human, Animal, Bird, Eye, Insect, Vehicle
OM-D E-M10 Mark III
Alpha 7R VI
Burst (mechanical)
6 fps
Burst (electronic)
11 fps
30 fps2.7× more
Pre-Capture / Pre-Release
No
RAW buffer depth
60 frames
150 frames2.5× more
OM-D E-M10 Mark III
Alpha 7R VI
Max resolution
4K UHD
8K
4K max frame rate
60 fps
120 fps2× more
Max video bit rate
150 Mbps
600 Mbps4× more
Internal RAW video
No
No
Log profile
Standard profiles
S-Cinetone / S-Log3
Codecs
H.265, H.264
XAVC HS, XAVC S, XAVC S-I, H.265, H.264
OM-D E-M10 Mark III
Alpha 7R VI
Weight
580 g−133 g less
713 g
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
134 × 91 × 72 mm
132.7 × 96.9 × 82.9 mm
Weather sealing
No

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for landscape, OM-D E-M10 Mark III or Alpha 7R VI?

Alpha 7R VI scores 7.5/10 versus 0.0/10 for OM-D E-M10 Mark III — 66.8MP — massive detail for large prints.

What's the resolution difference between the OM-D E-M10 Mark III and Alpha 7R VI?

OM-D E-M10 Mark III is 16 MP and Alpha 7R VI is 66.8 MP, so the Alpha 7R VI captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the OM-D E-M10 Mark III and Alpha 7R VI have in-body image stabilization?

OM-D E-M10 Mark III does not have IBIS, while alpha 7R VI has in-body image stabilization.

Which shoots faster bursts — the OM-D E-M10 Mark III or the Alpha 7R VI?

OM-D E-M10 Mark III reaches 11 fps electronic. Alpha 7R VI reaches 30 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the OM-D E-M10 Mark III and Alpha 7R VI?

OM-D E-M10 Mark III weighs 580 g and Alpha 7R VI weighs 713 g, so the OM-D E-M10 Mark III is 133 g lighter.

Do the OM-D E-M10 Mark III and Alpha 7R VI record 4K video?

OM-D E-M10 Mark III: 4K up to 60p. Alpha 7R VI: 8K (max), 4K up to 120p.

Are the OM-D E-M10 Mark III and Alpha 7R VI weather sealed?

OM-D E-M10 Mark III: No. Alpha 7R VI: No.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 640 shots (CIPA) for the OM-D E-M10 Mark III and 600 shots for the Alpha 7R VI, giving the OM-D E-M10 Mark III the edge.

How much does each cost?

OM-D E-M10 Mark III launched at $649 and Alpha 7R VI at $4,499. The OM-D E-M10 Mark III is $3,850 less.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed May 2026.

Product images courtesy of OM System and Sony press materials.