Panasonic
Lumix LX100 II
Premium fixed-zoom compact with multi-aspect Four Thirds sensor, fast Leica zoom, EVF, and 4K video.
$999
Launch priceReleased Aug 2018
Ricoh
GR IVx
40mm-equivalent GR IV sibling with a newly designed 26.1mm f/2.8 lens, 25.74MP APS-C sensor, 5-axis SR, 4K video, 53GB internal storage, and pocket street-camera handling. Winter 2026 planned.
$1,499
Launch priceReleased Dec 2026
GR IVx is 8.3 years newer.
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Wins
Lumix LX100 II
Wins
GR IVx
4 categories tied
Which would you choose?
TL;DR — Key differences
- ALumix LX100 II has higher Burst (electronic) (40 fps vs 4 fps)
- BGR IVx has higher ISO max (native) (204,800 vs 25,600)
- ALumix LX100 II has higher Burst (mechanical) (11 fps vs 4 fps)
- BGR IVx has lower ISO min (native) (100 vs 200)
- BGR IVx has higher Resolution (25.74 MP vs 17 MP)
Key specs at a glance
Size and weight, to scale
📸 Snap this size diff to share
Lumix LX100 II
115 × 66 × 64 mm
392 g (0.86 lb / 13.83 oz)
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
for scale
GR IVx
109 × 61 × 33 mm
265 g (0.58 lb / 9.35 oz)
Lumix LX100 II is 6mm wider, 5mm taller, and 31mm thicker than GR IVx.
Lumix LX100 II is 127 g heavier than GR IVx.
Depth (front-to-back): 64mm Lumix LX100 II · 33mm GR IVx
Back view, to scale
Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.
Lumix LX100 II
115 × 66 mm
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
GR IVx
109 × 61 mm
Top view, to scale
Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.
Lumix LX100 II
115 × 64 mm
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
GR IVx
109 × 33 mm
Sensor size, to scale
Lumix LX100 II
17.3 × 13 mm · Micro Four Thirds
225 mm² area
GR IVx
23.3 × 15.5 mm · APS-C
361 mm² area
1.6× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.
Use-case scoring
Which one for what?
Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class
Why pick one over the other
Reasons to choose
Lumix LX100 II
Codecs
Adds H.264, MP4, AVCHD
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
Adds 115, 66.2, 64.2
Card types
Adds SD UHS-I
Burst (electronic)
40 fps vs 4 fps — higher is better
Burst (mechanical)
11 fps vs 4 fps — higher is better
Animal / bird AF
Only Lumix LX100 II supports it
Subject recognition
Adds Human, Animal
Battery life (CIPA)
340 shots vs 250 shots — higher is better
Reasons to choose
GR IVx
Codecs
Adds MPEG-4 AVC/H.264, MOV
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
Adds 109.4, 61.1, 33.4
Card types
Adds microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC UHS-I
ISO max (native)
204,800 vs 25,600 — higher is better
ISO min (native)
100 vs 200 — lower is better
In-body stabilization (IBIS)
Only GR IVx supports it
Resolution
25.74 MP vs 17 MP — higher is better
Max video bit rate
150 Mbps vs 100 Mbps — higher is better
Both cameras share
- ✓AF points / zones — Both 49
- ✓Eye AF — Both support eye af
- ✓4K max frame rate — Both 30 fps
- ✓1080p max frame rate — Both 60 fps
- ✓Card slots — Both 1
- ✓Touchscreen — Both support touchscreen
Pros & cons at a glance
Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.
Lumix LX100 II
Pros
- ✓Large Four Thirds sensor
- ✓Fast 24-75mm equivalent lens
- ✓Built-in EVF
- ✓Compact controls
Cons
- –Fixed lens
- –No tilt screen
- –Not pocket-thin
GR IVx
Pros
- ✓New 26.1mm f/2.8 GR lens (40mm equiv.)
- ✓GR IV 25.74MP APS-C + 5-axis SR
- ✓4K 30p/24p and 53GB built-in storage
- ✓Snap focus, 50/71mm crops, 2-stop ND
- ✓Pocketable 265g body
Cons
- –Price not yet announced (listed at GR IV $1,499)
- –Winter 2026 or later — still in development as of Aug 2026
- –No built-in EVF
- –Fixed 40mm-equiv. lens
Decided which one is right for you?
Compare live prices for the Lumix LX100 II and GR IVx at major authorized retailers.
Panasonic Lumix LX100 II
Ricoh GR IVx
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Full specifications
✓ = category winner
Frequently asked
Quick answers generated from verified specs.
Which is better for portraits, Lumix LX100 II or GR IVx?
GR IVx scores 6.5/10 versus 3.0/10 for Lumix LX100 II — 25.74MP — solid resolution.
What's the resolution difference between the Lumix LX100 II and GR IVx?
Lumix LX100 II is 17 MP and GR IVx is 25.74 MP, so the GR IVx captures more detail for cropping and large prints.
Do the Lumix LX100 II and GR IVx have in-body image stabilization?
Lumix LX100 II does not have IBIS, while GR IVx has in-body image stabilization.
Which shoots faster bursts — the Lumix LX100 II or the GR IVx?
Lumix LX100 II reaches 40 fps electronic. GR IVx reaches 4 fps electronic.
What's the weight difference between the Lumix LX100 II and GR IVx?
Lumix LX100 II weighs 392 g and GR IVx weighs 265 g, so the GR IVx is 127 g lighter.
Do the Lumix LX100 II and GR IVx record 4K video?
Lumix LX100 II: 4K up to 30p. GR IVx: 4K up to 30p.
Are the Lumix LX100 II and GR IVx weather sealed?
Lumix LX100 II: No. GR IVx: No.
Which has better battery life?
Rated battery life is 340 shots (CIPA) for the Lumix LX100 II and 250 shots for the GR IVx, giving the Lumix LX100 II the edge.
How much does each cost?
Lumix LX100 II launched at $999 and GR IVx at $1,499. The Lumix LX100 II is $500 less.
Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.
Add any camera to get a three-way Lumix LX100 II vs GR IVx vs X comparison.
Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed September 2026.
Product images courtesy of Panasonic and Ricoh press materials.