Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg Compare

Panasonic

Lumix LX100

Original large-sensor LX compact with Four Thirds sensor crop, fast Leica zoom, EVF, and 4K video.

$899

Released Sep 2014

vs

Panasonic

Lumix S1R II

High-resolution 44.3MP full-frame L-mount body with 8K video, phase hybrid AF, and compact S-series ergonomics.

$3,299

Released Feb 2025

Lumix S1R II is 10.4 years newer.

Wins

2categories

Lumix LX100

Wins

14categories

Lumix S1R II

Video & HybridPortrait

2 categories tied

TL;DR — Key differences

Lumix LX100 wins 0 categories·Lumix S1R II wins 5 categories
  • BLumix S1R II has higher IBIS effectiveness (8 stops vs 0 stops)
  • BLumix S1R II has higher Max video bit rate (1900 Mbps vs 100 Mbps)
  • BLumix S1R II has higher AF points / zones (779 vs 49)
  • BLumix S1R II has higher RAW buffer depth (70 frames vs 9 frames)
  • BLumix S1R II has higher 4K max frame rate (120 fps vs 30 fps)

Key specs at a glance

Lumix LX100Lumix S1R II
Resolution12.8 MP44.3 MP
SensorMFTAPS-C
ISO max25,60051,200
Burst40 fps40 fps
4K30 fps120 fps
IBISNo8-stop
Weight393 g795 g
Battery300 shots350 shots

Size and weight, to scale

Lumix LX100

115 × 66 × 55 mm

393 g (0.87 lb / 13.86 oz)

Lumix S1R II

134 × 102 × 92 mm

795 g (1.75 lb / 28.04 oz)

Lumix LX100 is 20mm narrower, 36mm shorter, and 37mm thinner than Lumix S1R II.

Lumix LX100 is 402 g lighter than Lumix S1R II.

Depth (front-to-back): 55mm Lumix LX100 · 92mm Lumix S1R II

Sensor size, to scale

Lumix LX100

17.3 × 13 mm · Micro Four Thirds

225 mm² area

Lumix S1R II

35.8 × 23.9 mm · Full Frame

856 mm² area

3.8× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseLumix LX100Lumix S1R II
Portrait
3.0Limited
8.5Excellent✓ wins
Sports & Action
4.0Fair
8.0Excellent✓ wins
Video & Hybrid
3.0Limited
9.5Excellent✓ wins
Landscape
0.0Limited
8.5Excellent✓ wins
Travel
4.5Fair
4.5Fair
Wildlife
4.0Fair
8.0Excellent✓ wins
Vlogging
3.5Limited
5.5Fair✓ wins

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

Lumix LX100

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 114.8, 66.2, 55

  • Card types

    Adds SD UHS-I

  • Weight

    393 g vs 795 g — lower is better

  • Codecs

    Adds AVCHD

  • Burst (mechanical)

    11 fps vs 10 fps — higher is better

Reasons to choose

Lumix S1R II

  • AF low-light limit

    -6 EV vs -4 EV — lower is better

  • IBIS effectiveness

    8 stops vs 0 stops — higher is better

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 134.3, 102.3, 91.8

  • Card types

    Adds CFexpress Type B, SD UHS-II

  • Max video bit rate

    1900 Mbps vs 100 Mbps — higher is better

  • AF points / zones

    779 vs 49 — higher is better

  • RAW buffer depth

    70 frames vs 9 frames — higher is better

  • 4K max frame rate

    120 fps vs 30 fps — higher is better

Both cameras share

  • AF frame coverageBoth 100 %
  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • Animal / bird AFBoth support animal / bird af
  • Burst (electronic)Both 40 fps
  • TouchscreenBoth support touchscreen
  • Wi-FiBoth support wi-fi

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

Lumix LX100

Pros

  • Large sensor compact
  • Fast Leica zoom
  • Built-in EVF
  • 4K video

Cons

  • 12.8MP output
  • No touch screen
  • Older AF

Lumix S1R II

Pros

  • 44.3MP full-frame BSI sensor
  • 8K video
  • Phase Hybrid AF
  • CFexpress plus SD workflow

Cons

  • Large high-res files
  • Premium price
  • L-mount lens size

Full specifications

= category winner

Lumix LX100
Lumix S1R II
Resolution
12.8 MP
44.3 MP3.5× more
Sensor type
Four Thirds Live MOS
35mm Full-Frame BSI CMOS
Sensor size
17.3 x 13.0 mm
35.8 x 23.9 mm
AA filter
No
No
Lumix LX100
Lumix S1R II
AF system
Contrast AF with DFD technology
Phase Hybrid AF with DFD technology
AF points / zones
49
77915.9× more
AF frame coverage
100 %
100 %
AF low-light limit
-4 EV
-6 EV
Eye AF
Yes
Yes
Animal / bird AF
Yes
Yes
Subject recognition
Human, Face, Eye, Animal
Human, Face, Eye, Animal, Car, Motorcycle
Lumix LX100
Lumix S1R II
Burst (mechanical)
11 fps+10%
10 fps
Burst (electronic)
40 fps
40 fps
Pre-Capture / Pre-Release
No
Yes
RAW buffer depth
9 frames
70 frames7.8× more
Lumix LX100
Lumix S1R II
Max resolution
4K
8K
4K max frame rate
30 fps
120 fps4× more
Max video bit rate
100 Mbps
1900 Mbps19× more
Internal RAW video
No
Yes
Log profile
None
V-Log / ARRI LogC3
Codecs
H.264, MP4, AVCHD
Apple ProRes RAW, Apple ProRes 422 HQ, H.265, H.264, MOV, MP4
Lumix LX100
Lumix S1R II
Weight
393 g−402 g less
795 g
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
114.8 × 66.2 × 55 mm
134.3 × 102.3 × 91.8 mm
Weather sealing
No
Yes

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for landscape, Lumix LX100 or Lumix S1R II?

Lumix S1R II scores 8.5/10 versus 0.0/10 for Lumix LX100 — 44.3MP — excellent for prints up to 24×36".

What's the resolution difference between the Lumix LX100 and Lumix S1R II?

Lumix LX100 is 12.8 MP and Lumix S1R II is 44.3 MP, so the Lumix S1R II captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the Lumix LX100 and Lumix S1R II have in-body image stabilization?

Lumix LX100 does not have IBIS, while lumix S1R II has 8-stop in-body image stabilization.

Which shoots faster bursts — the Lumix LX100 or the Lumix S1R II?

Lumix LX100 reaches 40 fps electronic. Lumix S1R II reaches 40 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the Lumix LX100 and Lumix S1R II?

Lumix LX100 weighs 393 g and Lumix S1R II weighs 795 g, so the Lumix LX100 is 402 g lighter.

Do the Lumix LX100 and Lumix S1R II record 4K video?

Lumix LX100: 4K up to 30p. Lumix S1R II: 8K (max), 4K up to 120p.

Are the Lumix LX100 and Lumix S1R II weather sealed?

Lumix LX100: No. Lumix S1R II: Yes.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 300 shots (CIPA) for the Lumix LX100 and 350 shots for the Lumix S1R II, giving the Lumix S1R II the edge.

How much does each cost?

Lumix LX100 launched at $899 and Lumix S1R II at $3,299. The Lumix LX100 is $2,400 less.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed May 2026.